H. Chemaitelly, H. Ayoub, P. Coyle, P. Tang, M. R. Hasan, H. Yassine, A. Althani, Z. Al-Kanaani, E. Al-Kuwari, A. Jeremijenko, A. Kaleeckal, A. Latif, R. Shaik, H. Abdul-Rahim, G. Nasrallah, M. G. Al-Kuwari, H. Al-Romaihi, M. Al-Thani, A. Al-Khal, R. Bertollini, A. A. Butt, L. Abu-Raddad
{"title":"Assessing Healthy Vaccinee Bias in COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Studies: A National Cohort Study in Qatar","authors":"H. Chemaitelly, H. Ayoub, P. Coyle, P. Tang, M. R. Hasan, H. Yassine, A. Althani, Z. Al-Kanaani, E. Al-Kuwari, A. Jeremijenko, A. Kaleeckal, A. Latif, R. Shaik, H. Abdul-Rahim, G. Nasrallah, M. G. Al-Kuwari, H. Al-Romaihi, M. Al-Thani, A. Al-Khal, R. Bertollini, A. A. Butt, L. Abu-Raddad","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.28.24311115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study investigated the presence of the healthy vaccinee bias in two COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness studies, involving primary series and booster vaccinations, as well as its temporal patterns and variability across different subpopulations, by examining the association between COVID-19 vaccination and non-COVID-19 mortality in Qatar. Methods: Two matched, retrospective cohort studies assessed the incidence of non-COVID-19 death in national cohorts of individuals with a primary series vaccination versus no vaccination (two-dose analysis), and individuals with three-dose (booster) vaccination versus primary series vaccination (three-dose analysis), from January 5, 2021, to April 9, 2024. Results: The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for non-COVID-19 death was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90) in the two-dose analysis and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.67-1.07) in the three-dose analysis. In the first six months of follow-up in the two-dose analysis, the aHR was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.27-0.46); however, the combined analysis of all subsequent periods showed an aHR of 1.52 (95% CI: 1.19-1.94). In the first six months of follow-up in the three-dose analysis, the aHR was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.20-0.50); however, the combined analysis of all subsequent periods showed an aHR of 1.37 (95% CI: 1.02-1.85). The overall effectiveness of the primary series and third-dose vaccinations against severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 was 95.9% (95% CI: 94.0-97.1) and 34.1% (95% CI: -46.4-76.7), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the healthy vaccinee bias is pronounced among those aged 50 years and older and among those more clinically vulnerable to severe COVID-19. Conclusion: A strong healthy vaccinee bias was observed in the first six months following vaccination. This bias may have stemmed from a lower likelihood of vaccination among seriously ill, end-of-life individuals, and less mobile elderly populations. Despite this bias, vaccination provided strong protection against severe COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.28.24311115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study investigated the presence of the healthy vaccinee bias in two COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness studies, involving primary series and booster vaccinations, as well as its temporal patterns and variability across different subpopulations, by examining the association between COVID-19 vaccination and non-COVID-19 mortality in Qatar. Methods: Two matched, retrospective cohort studies assessed the incidence of non-COVID-19 death in national cohorts of individuals with a primary series vaccination versus no vaccination (two-dose analysis), and individuals with three-dose (booster) vaccination versus primary series vaccination (three-dose analysis), from January 5, 2021, to April 9, 2024. Results: The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for non-COVID-19 death was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90) in the two-dose analysis and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.67-1.07) in the three-dose analysis. In the first six months of follow-up in the two-dose analysis, the aHR was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.27-0.46); however, the combined analysis of all subsequent periods showed an aHR of 1.52 (95% CI: 1.19-1.94). In the first six months of follow-up in the three-dose analysis, the aHR was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.20-0.50); however, the combined analysis of all subsequent periods showed an aHR of 1.37 (95% CI: 1.02-1.85). The overall effectiveness of the primary series and third-dose vaccinations against severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 was 95.9% (95% CI: 94.0-97.1) and 34.1% (95% CI: -46.4-76.7), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the healthy vaccinee bias is pronounced among those aged 50 years and older and among those more clinically vulnerable to severe COVID-19. Conclusion: A strong healthy vaccinee bias was observed in the first six months following vaccination. This bias may have stemmed from a lower likelihood of vaccination among seriously ill, end-of-life individuals, and less mobile elderly populations. Despite this bias, vaccination provided strong protection against severe COVID-19.