Lung function may recover after exposure to smoke from a coal mine fire: cohort study

N. Holt, C. L. Smith, C. X. Gao, B. Borg, T. J. Lane, D. Brown, J. Ikin, A. Makar, T. McCrabb, M. Thomas, K. Nilsen, B. Thompson, M. Abramson
{"title":"Lung function may recover after exposure to smoke from a coal mine fire: cohort study","authors":"N. Holt, C. L. Smith, C. X. Gao, B. Borg, T. J. Lane, D. Brown, J. Ikin, A. Makar, T. McCrabb, M. Thomas, K. Nilsen, B. Thompson, M. Abramson","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.29.24311157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objective: The 2014 Hazelwood coalmine fire exposed residents in nearby Morwell to high concentrations of particulate matter <2.5 m (PM2.5) for approximately 6 weeks. This analysis aimed to evaluate the long-term impact on respiratory health. Methods: Adults from Morwell and the unexposed town of Sale completed validated respiratory questionnaires and performed spirometry, gas transfer and oscillometry 3.5-4 years (Round 1) and 7.3-7.8 years (Round 2) after the fire. Individual PM2.5 exposure levels were estimated using chemical transport models mapped onto participant-reported time-location data. Mixed-effects regression models were fitted to analyse associations between PM2.5 exposure and outcomes, controlling for key confounders. Results: From 519 (346 exposed) Round 1 participants, 329 (217 exposed) participated in Round 2. Spirometry and gas transfer in Round 2 were mostly lower compared with Round 1, excepting FVC (increased) and FEV1 (minimal change). The effect of mine fire-related PM2.5 exposure changed from a negative effect in Round 1 to no effect in Round 2 for both pre- (p=0.005) and post-bronchodilator FVC (p=0.032). PM2.5 was not associated with gas transfer in either round. For post-bronchodilator reactance and area under the curve, a negative impact of PM2.5 in Round 1 showed signs of recovery in Round 2 (both p<0.001). Conclusion: In this novel study evaluating long-term respiratory outcomes after medium-duration high concentration PM2.5 exposure, the attenuated associations between exposure and respiratory function may indicate some recovery in lung function. With increased frequency and severity of landscape fires observed globally, these results inform public health policies and planning.","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.29.24311157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: The 2014 Hazelwood coalmine fire exposed residents in nearby Morwell to high concentrations of particulate matter <2.5 m (PM2.5) for approximately 6 weeks. This analysis aimed to evaluate the long-term impact on respiratory health. Methods: Adults from Morwell and the unexposed town of Sale completed validated respiratory questionnaires and performed spirometry, gas transfer and oscillometry 3.5-4 years (Round 1) and 7.3-7.8 years (Round 2) after the fire. Individual PM2.5 exposure levels were estimated using chemical transport models mapped onto participant-reported time-location data. Mixed-effects regression models were fitted to analyse associations between PM2.5 exposure and outcomes, controlling for key confounders. Results: From 519 (346 exposed) Round 1 participants, 329 (217 exposed) participated in Round 2. Spirometry and gas transfer in Round 2 were mostly lower compared with Round 1, excepting FVC (increased) and FEV1 (minimal change). The effect of mine fire-related PM2.5 exposure changed from a negative effect in Round 1 to no effect in Round 2 for both pre- (p=0.005) and post-bronchodilator FVC (p=0.032). PM2.5 was not associated with gas transfer in either round. For post-bronchodilator reactance and area under the curve, a negative impact of PM2.5 in Round 1 showed signs of recovery in Round 2 (both p<0.001). Conclusion: In this novel study evaluating long-term respiratory outcomes after medium-duration high concentration PM2.5 exposure, the attenuated associations between exposure and respiratory function may indicate some recovery in lung function. With increased frequency and severity of landscape fires observed globally, these results inform public health policies and planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接触煤矿火灾烟雾后肺功能可能会恢复:队列研究
背景和目标:2014 年的黑泽尔伍德煤矿大火使附近莫韦尔的居民在大约 6 周的时间里暴露在浓度小于 2.5 米的高浓度颗粒物(PM2.5)中。本分析旨在评估对呼吸系统健康的长期影响。分析方法火灾发生后 3.5-4 年(第一轮)和 7.3-7.8 年(第二轮),来自莫韦尔和未受影响的萨利镇的成年人填写了有效的呼吸系统问卷,并进行了肺活量测定、气体传输和振荡测定。利用映射到参与者报告的时间地点数据上的化学迁移模型估算了个人的 PM2.5 暴露水平。混合效应回归模型用于分析 PM2.5 暴露与结果之间的关系,同时控制主要的混杂因素。研究结果在 519 名(346 名暴露者)第一轮参与者中,有 329 名(217 名暴露者)参加了第二轮。与第一轮相比,第二轮的肺活量和气体转移量大多较低,但 FVC(增加)和 FEV1(变化极小)除外。与矿井火灾有关的 PM2.5 暴露对肺活量测定前(p=0.005)和支气管舒张后(p=0.032)的影响从第一轮的负面影响变为第二轮的无影响。PM2.5在两轮中均与气体转移无关。对于支气管舒张后反应性和曲线下面积,PM2.5 在第一轮的负面影响在第二轮有恢复迹象(均 p<0.001)。结论在这项评估中长期高浓度 PM2.5 暴露后长期呼吸系统结果的新研究中,暴露与呼吸功能之间的关联减弱可能表明肺功能有所恢复。随着全球景观火灾频率和严重程度的增加,这些结果将为公共卫生政策和规划提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reemergence of Oropouche virus between 2023 and 2024 in Brazil Towards Personalized Breast Cancer Risk Management: A Thai Cohort Study on Polygenic Risk Scores Hot Spring Residency and Disease Association: a Crossover Gene-Environment Interaction (GxE) Study in Taiwan Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in renal cancer Dual exposure-by-polygenic score interactions highlight disparities across social groups in the proportion needed to benefit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1