Flood drivers and trends: a case study of the Geul River catchment (the Netherlands) over the past half century

Athanasios Tsiokanos, Martine Rutten, R. J. van der Ent, R. Uijlenhoet
{"title":"Flood drivers and trends: a case study of the Geul River catchment (the Netherlands) over the past half century","authors":"Athanasios Tsiokanos, Martine Rutten, R. J. van der Ent, R. Uijlenhoet","doi":"10.5194/hess-28-3327-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In July 2021, extreme precipitation caused devastating flooding in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands, particularly in the Geul River catchment. Such precipitation extremes had not been previously recorded and were not expected to occur in summer. This contributed to poor flood forecasting and, hence, extensive damage. Climate change was mentioned as a potential explanation for these unprecedented events. However, before such a statement can be made, we need a better understanding of the drivers of floods in the Geul and their long-term variability, which are poorly understood and have not been recently examined. In this paper, we use an event-based approach to identify the dominant flood drivers in the Geul. We also employ (1) a multi-temporal trend analysis to investigate their temporal variability and (2) a novel methodology to detect the dominant direction of any trend. Results suggest that extreme 24 h precipitation alone is typically insufficient to cause floods. The joint probability of extreme and prolonged rainfall combined with wet initial conditions (compound event) determines the chances of flooding. Flood-producing precipitation shows a consistent increase in the winter half-year, a period in which more than 70 % of extremely high flows have historically occurred. While no consistent trend patterns are evident in the majority of precipitation and extreme flow trends in the summer half-year, an increasing direction is visible in the recent past.\n","PeriodicalId":507846,"journal":{"name":"Hydrology and Earth System Sciences","volume":"5 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrology and Earth System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3327-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. In July 2021, extreme precipitation caused devastating flooding in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands, particularly in the Geul River catchment. Such precipitation extremes had not been previously recorded and were not expected to occur in summer. This contributed to poor flood forecasting and, hence, extensive damage. Climate change was mentioned as a potential explanation for these unprecedented events. However, before such a statement can be made, we need a better understanding of the drivers of floods in the Geul and their long-term variability, which are poorly understood and have not been recently examined. In this paper, we use an event-based approach to identify the dominant flood drivers in the Geul. We also employ (1) a multi-temporal trend analysis to investigate their temporal variability and (2) a novel methodology to detect the dominant direction of any trend. Results suggest that extreme 24 h precipitation alone is typically insufficient to cause floods. The joint probability of extreme and prolonged rainfall combined with wet initial conditions (compound event) determines the chances of flooding. Flood-producing precipitation shows a consistent increase in the winter half-year, a period in which more than 70 % of extremely high flows have historically occurred. While no consistent trend patterns are evident in the majority of precipitation and extreme flow trends in the summer half-year, an increasing direction is visible in the recent past.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
洪水驱动因素和趋势:过去半个世纪 Geul 河流域(荷兰)案例研究
摘要2021 年 7 月,极端降水在德国、比利时和荷兰造成了毁灭性的洪灾,尤其是在盖尔河流域。这种极端降水以前从未有过记录,预计也不会在夏季出现。这导致了洪水预报的失误,从而造成了广泛的损失。气候变化被认为是这些前所未有事件的潜在原因。然而,在做出这样的解释之前,我们需要更好地了解 Geul 地区洪水的驱动因素及其长期变异性。在本文中,我们采用基于事件的方法来识别 Geul 地区主要的洪水驱动因素。我们还采用了(1)多时相趋势分析来研究其时间变异性;(2)一种新方法来检测任何趋势的主导方向。结果表明,仅 24 小时极端降水通常不足以引发洪水。极端和长时间降雨加上潮湿初始条件(复合事件)的共同概率决定了洪水发生的几率。产生洪水的降水量在冬半年持续增加,历史上超过 70% 的特大流量都发生在这一时期。虽然夏季半年的大部分降水量和特大流量趋势没有明显的一致趋势模式,但在最近的过去可以看到一个增加的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flood drivers and trends: a case study of the Geul River catchment (the Netherlands) over the past half century Evolution of river regimes in the Mekong River basin over 8 decades and the role of dams in recent hydrological extremes Machine-learning-constrained projection of bivariate hydrological drought magnitudes and socioeconomic risks over China Impact of reservoir evaporation on future water availability in north-eastern Brazil: a multi-scenario assessment The agricultural expansion in South America's Dry Chaco: regional hydroclimate effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1