Response of Yam Yield and Soil Microbial Communities to Soil Fumigation and Substrate Cultivation

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Agriculture Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.3390/agriculture14081231
Xi Jin, Zheng Hao, Yelong Song, Lan Gao, Fuqiang He, Qingjie Li, A. Cao
{"title":"Response of Yam Yield and Soil Microbial Communities to Soil Fumigation and Substrate Cultivation","authors":"Xi Jin, Zheng Hao, Yelong Song, Lan Gao, Fuqiang He, Qingjie Li, A. Cao","doi":"10.3390/agriculture14081231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil fumigation is considered a method to control soil-borne diseases and solve crop continuous cropping obstacles. However, fumigant residues in the soil are detrimental to soil health. Though substrate cultivation is a cultivation mode that can promote plant growth, studies to date on whether substrate cultivation can replace soil fumigation for the control of soil pathogens are limited. In this study, the effects of chloropicrin fumigation (Pic) and substrate cultivation (SC) on yam growth, soil pathogens, soil nutrients, and microbial communities were demonstrated using a 2-year field experiment. The results showed that SC significantly increased the content of soil organic matter (SOM), available phosphorus, and available potassium compared with Pic. In addition, SC could effectively reduce the number of Fusarium spp. and Phytophthora spp., decrease the rate of diseased yam plants, and significantly increase the yam yield. Moreover, SC significantly increased the abundance of beneficial microorganisms such as Actinobacteriota, Acidobacteriota, and Bacillus in soil. Correlation analysis showed that yam yield exhibited a negative relation with the number of soil pathogens and a positive correlation with SOM. Our study suggests that substrate cultivation can be an alternative to soil fumigation to control soil pathogens and protect soil health.","PeriodicalId":7447,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture","volume":"33 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil fumigation is considered a method to control soil-borne diseases and solve crop continuous cropping obstacles. However, fumigant residues in the soil are detrimental to soil health. Though substrate cultivation is a cultivation mode that can promote plant growth, studies to date on whether substrate cultivation can replace soil fumigation for the control of soil pathogens are limited. In this study, the effects of chloropicrin fumigation (Pic) and substrate cultivation (SC) on yam growth, soil pathogens, soil nutrients, and microbial communities were demonstrated using a 2-year field experiment. The results showed that SC significantly increased the content of soil organic matter (SOM), available phosphorus, and available potassium compared with Pic. In addition, SC could effectively reduce the number of Fusarium spp. and Phytophthora spp., decrease the rate of diseased yam plants, and significantly increase the yam yield. Moreover, SC significantly increased the abundance of beneficial microorganisms such as Actinobacteriota, Acidobacteriota, and Bacillus in soil. Correlation analysis showed that yam yield exhibited a negative relation with the number of soil pathogens and a positive correlation with SOM. Our study suggests that substrate cultivation can be an alternative to soil fumigation to control soil pathogens and protect soil health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
山药产量和土壤微生物群落对土壤熏蒸和基质栽培的响应
土壤熏蒸被认为是控制土传病害和解决作物连作障碍的一种方法。然而,土壤中残留的熏蒸剂不利于土壤健康。虽然基质栽培是一种能促进植物生长的栽培模式,但迄今为止,关于基质栽培能否取代土壤熏蒸来控制土壤病原菌的研究还很有限。本研究通过为期两年的田间试验,证明了氯化苦熏蒸(Pic)和基质栽培(SC)对山药生长、土壤病原体、土壤养分和微生物群落的影响。结果表明,与 Pic 相比,SC 能显著提高土壤有机质(SOM)、可利用磷和可利用钾的含量。此外,SC 还能有效减少镰刀菌属和疫霉属的数量,降低山药病株率,并显著提高山药产量。此外,SC 还能明显增加土壤中放线菌、酸性杆菌和芽孢杆菌等有益微生物的数量。相关分析表明,山药产量与土壤病原体数量呈负相关,而与 SOM 呈正相关。我们的研究表明,基质栽培可以替代土壤熏蒸,控制土壤病原体,保护土壤健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture
Agriculture Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Horticulture
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Agriculture (Poľnohospodárstvo) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes mainly original research papers. The journal examines various aspects of research and is devoted to the publication of papers dealing with the following subjects: plant nutrition, protection, breeding, genetics and biotechnology, quality of plant products, grassland, mountain agriculture and environment, soil science and conservation, mechanization and economics of plant production and other spheres of plant science. Journal is published 4 times per year.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Abscisic Acid on Rice Seed Dormancy: Antioxidant Response and Accumulations of Melatonin, Phenolics and Momilactones Classification of Degradable Mulch Films and Their Promotional Effects and Limitations on Agricultural Production Deep Learning with a Multi-Task Convolutional Neural Network to Generate a National-Scale 3D Soil Data Product: The Particle Size Distribution of the German Agricultural Soil Landscape Enhanced Food-Production Efficiencies through Integrated Farming Systems in the Hau Giang Province in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam The Influence of Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertilization on Oil Quality and Seed Meal in Different Genotypes of Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1