{"title":"Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall Using EPS Geofoam","authors":"Rashid Mustafa","doi":"10.4028/p-wvjmo3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Earth retaining wall structures are common civil engineering structures. Estimation of magnitude and distribution of earth pressure on retaining structures under different surcharge loading conditions is essential as they influence the design and overall economy of retaining structures. Numerical modeling using finite element code PLAXIS is used static analysis. 7 m height of non-yielding cantilever retaining wall with and without EPS geofoam structure is studied and 20 m backfill width was considered. In the present study backfill was modeled as Mohr-Coulomb yield criteria and EPS geofoam and wall were modeled as Linear-elastic. EPS geofoam densities namely 12 kg/m3 and 15 kg/m3 and two different geofoam thicknesses 0.107H and 0.143H were used for static analysis. Three different surcharge loading namely 10 kPa,30kPa and 50kPa which were kept at a distance of 2.0 m away from the wall face. In the static analysis earth pressure distribution for wall with and without geofoam were analyzed. Approximately 50% isolation efficiency was reported. At lower surcharge loads the effectiveness of EPS is more as compare to higher surcharge load and with increase in surcharge load, isolation efficiency gradually decreases and isolation efficiency decreases with increase in buffer modulus. Apart from these serviceability criteria was also checked. Serviceability criteria comprise of lateral deformation of EPS geofoam at sand-geofoam interface and backfill surface settlement were studied. Lower EPS geofoam density and higher EPS geofoam thickness reduces higher magnitude of earth pressure but in this combination the backfill surface settlement was coming very high.","PeriodicalId":7184,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Engineering Forum","volume":"49 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Engineering Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-wvjmo3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Earth retaining wall structures are common civil engineering structures. Estimation of magnitude and distribution of earth pressure on retaining structures under different surcharge loading conditions is essential as they influence the design and overall economy of retaining structures. Numerical modeling using finite element code PLAXIS is used static analysis. 7 m height of non-yielding cantilever retaining wall with and without EPS geofoam structure is studied and 20 m backfill width was considered. In the present study backfill was modeled as Mohr-Coulomb yield criteria and EPS geofoam and wall were modeled as Linear-elastic. EPS geofoam densities namely 12 kg/m3 and 15 kg/m3 and two different geofoam thicknesses 0.107H and 0.143H were used for static analysis. Three different surcharge loading namely 10 kPa,30kPa and 50kPa which were kept at a distance of 2.0 m away from the wall face. In the static analysis earth pressure distribution for wall with and without geofoam were analyzed. Approximately 50% isolation efficiency was reported. At lower surcharge loads the effectiveness of EPS is more as compare to higher surcharge load and with increase in surcharge load, isolation efficiency gradually decreases and isolation efficiency decreases with increase in buffer modulus. Apart from these serviceability criteria was also checked. Serviceability criteria comprise of lateral deformation of EPS geofoam at sand-geofoam interface and backfill surface settlement were studied. Lower EPS geofoam density and higher EPS geofoam thickness reduces higher magnitude of earth pressure but in this combination the backfill surface settlement was coming very high.