Performance of traditional household drinking water treatment methods used in rural Amazon

Maria Cecilia Rosinski Lima Gomes, L. C. de Andrade, Milena Pinho Barbosa, Bruna Coelho Lopes, C. R. Mota Filho
{"title":"Performance of traditional household drinking water treatment methods used in rural Amazon","authors":"Maria Cecilia Rosinski Lima Gomes, L. C. de Andrade, Milena Pinho Barbosa, Bruna Coelho Lopes, C. R. Mota Filho","doi":"10.3389/frwa.2024.1392800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Residents of remote areas in the Amazon often lack access to a water supply system and thus need to produce their potable water at home. This study examined the efficacy of household water treatments traditionally used by these communities to treat rainwater and river water, their predominant water sources. Samples of untreated, treated, and stored drinking water were collected from 18 households in three communities in Central Amazon, Amazonas State, Brazil. We describe the materials and practices involved and traditionally used in each treatment technique – cloth filtration (water straining), chlorination, and sedimentation, and their efficiency. In the samples we evaluate water quality analyses, as free chlorine, color, coliforms, and turbidity. The treatment steps for the separation of solids in river water were effective only for removing turbidity and apparent color. Straining river water after sedimentation had no relevant effect on water quality. Chlorination of rainwater was efficient in inactivating Escherichia coli; however, all samples showed some level of contamination by E. coli. We found a significant difference (p < 0.05) between untreated and treated river water turbidity, reduced by up to 22%. Untreated rain and river waters showed similar levels of microbiological contamination, close to 3.5 log CFU/100 mL of E. coli. Chlorine effectively removed microbiological contaminants in rainwater (median removal of 100, 44.5% of samples with <1 CFU/100 mL). Yet, this treatment was less effective for river water (94% median removal, with 11% of samples with <100 CFU/100 mL and only 5.5% with <1 CFU/100 mL found in treated water), showing a significant reduction in both cases when the Wilcoxon test was applied. Sodium hypochlorite treatment showed the best results among the techniques evaluated in this study. It can be used in remote areas where rainwater is available for consumption. Microorganism concentration increased after water underwent water straining and sedimentation processes. These results suggest that the improper handling of water containers and materials used during treatment processes leads to contamination of water. Thus, more robust outreach and educational efforts are recommended to improve remote communities’ water collection, treatment, and storage practices.","PeriodicalId":504613,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Water","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2024.1392800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Residents of remote areas in the Amazon often lack access to a water supply system and thus need to produce their potable water at home. This study examined the efficacy of household water treatments traditionally used by these communities to treat rainwater and river water, their predominant water sources. Samples of untreated, treated, and stored drinking water were collected from 18 households in three communities in Central Amazon, Amazonas State, Brazil. We describe the materials and practices involved and traditionally used in each treatment technique – cloth filtration (water straining), chlorination, and sedimentation, and their efficiency. In the samples we evaluate water quality analyses, as free chlorine, color, coliforms, and turbidity. The treatment steps for the separation of solids in river water were effective only for removing turbidity and apparent color. Straining river water after sedimentation had no relevant effect on water quality. Chlorination of rainwater was efficient in inactivating Escherichia coli; however, all samples showed some level of contamination by E. coli. We found a significant difference (p < 0.05) between untreated and treated river water turbidity, reduced by up to 22%. Untreated rain and river waters showed similar levels of microbiological contamination, close to 3.5 log CFU/100 mL of E. coli. Chlorine effectively removed microbiological contaminants in rainwater (median removal of 100, 44.5% of samples with <1 CFU/100 mL). Yet, this treatment was less effective for river water (94% median removal, with 11% of samples with <100 CFU/100 mL and only 5.5% with <1 CFU/100 mL found in treated water), showing a significant reduction in both cases when the Wilcoxon test was applied. Sodium hypochlorite treatment showed the best results among the techniques evaluated in this study. It can be used in remote areas where rainwater is available for consumption. Microorganism concentration increased after water underwent water straining and sedimentation processes. These results suggest that the improper handling of water containers and materials used during treatment processes leads to contamination of water. Thus, more robust outreach and educational efforts are recommended to improve remote communities’ water collection, treatment, and storage practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚马逊农村地区使用的传统家庭饮用水处理方法的性能
亚马逊偏远地区的居民通常没有供水系统,因此需要在家中生产饮用水。本研究考察了这些社区传统上用来处理雨水和河水(他们的主要水源)的家庭水处理方法的功效。我们从巴西亚马逊州亚马逊中部三个社区的 18 户家庭中收集了未经处理、已处理和储存的饮用水样本。我们介绍了每种处理技术(滤布过滤(滤水)、氯化和沉淀)所涉及的材料和传统做法及其效率。我们对样本中的游离氯、色度、大肠菌群和浑浊度等水质分析进行了评估。分离河水中固体物质的处理步骤只对去除浑浊度和显色有效。沉淀后过滤的河水对水质没有影响。对雨水进行氯化处理可有效灭活大肠杆菌,但所有样本都受到一定程度的大肠杆菌污染。我们发现,未经处理的河水和经过处理的河水浑浊度有明显差异(p < 0.05),最高降低了 22%。未经处理的雨水和河水显示出相似的微生物污染水平,大肠杆菌含量接近 3.5 log CFU/100 mL。氯能有效去除雨水中的微生物污染物(去除率中位数为 100,44.5% 的样本中 CFU 小于 1)。然而,这种处理方法对河水的效果较差(去除率中位数为 94%,处理过的河水中有 11% 的样本 CFU 值小于 100,仅有 5.5% 的样本 CFU 值小于 1)。在本研究评估的各种技术中,次氯酸钠处理的效果最好。它可用于有雨水可供饮用的偏远地区。经过滤水和沉淀处理后,水中的微生物浓度有所增加。这些结果表明,水容器和处理过程中使用的材料处理不当会导致水污染。因此,建议开展更有力的宣传和教育工作,以改善偏远社区的取水、水处理和储水方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of climate change on Africa’s major lakes: a systematic review incorporating pathways of enhancing climate resilience Differences in aquatic respiration in two contrasting streams: forested vs. agricultural Performance of traditional household drinking water treatment methods used in rural Amazon A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process -GIS approach to flood susceptibility mapping in NEOM, Saudi Arabia The short-term effect of nitrogen on freshwater cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1