A Meta-Analysis Approach on Medical, Surgical and Expectant Management on Abortion of First Trimester

Shivali Negi, Kavya Sharma, Anwesa Acharya, Ananya Prabhu, Rinshu Dwivedi, Ramesh Athe
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis Approach on Medical, Surgical and Expectant Management on Abortion of First Trimester","authors":"Shivali Negi, Kavya Sharma, Anwesa Acharya, Ananya Prabhu, Rinshu Dwivedi, Ramesh Athe","doi":"10.54103/2282-0930/22705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An increase in miscarriage in the first trimester of gestation and its associated complication is burden-some on the quality of life of a woman. Medical, surgical, and expectant care are carried out after the miscarriage to remove any remaining tissues in the uterus. Understanding the efficacy and safety of these interventions will raise awareness and be a deciding factor to choose an appropriate treatment plan. Present review aims to determine the efficacy and safety of medical, surgical, and expectant care of various medical and surgical methods for first-trimester miscarriage. This review included studies that allocated women to medical, surgical or expectant management in the first trimester. PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase Library were searched for the literature. The primary outcome was the complete evacuation of products of conception. Data were independently reviewed, graded for evidence quality, and assessed for risk bias by using the guidelines of PRISMA (Preferred Report Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis). 21 eligible articles were included in this systematic review, comprising of 7931 patients undergoing medical, surgical or expectant-management for early spontaneous-miscarriage. The success rate in surgical intervention was higher when compared with medical intervention (OR: 16.12 [9.11, 28.52]) and expectant management (OR: 2.78 [2.13, 3.61]). Whereas medical intervention had a high success rate when compared with expectant-management (OR: 4.29 [2.31, 7.97]). The review determines the effect of medical, surgical, and expectant-management procedures on women who have had spontaneous-miscarriages in their first-trimester. PROSPERO-International prospective register of systematic reviews–CRD42020154395.","PeriodicalId":510132,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Public Health","volume":"30 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/2282-0930/22705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An increase in miscarriage in the first trimester of gestation and its associated complication is burden-some on the quality of life of a woman. Medical, surgical, and expectant care are carried out after the miscarriage to remove any remaining tissues in the uterus. Understanding the efficacy and safety of these interventions will raise awareness and be a deciding factor to choose an appropriate treatment plan. Present review aims to determine the efficacy and safety of medical, surgical, and expectant care of various medical and surgical methods for first-trimester miscarriage. This review included studies that allocated women to medical, surgical or expectant management in the first trimester. PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase Library were searched for the literature. The primary outcome was the complete evacuation of products of conception. Data were independently reviewed, graded for evidence quality, and assessed for risk bias by using the guidelines of PRISMA (Preferred Report Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis). 21 eligible articles were included in this systematic review, comprising of 7931 patients undergoing medical, surgical or expectant-management for early spontaneous-miscarriage. The success rate in surgical intervention was higher when compared with medical intervention (OR: 16.12 [9.11, 28.52]) and expectant management (OR: 2.78 [2.13, 3.61]). Whereas medical intervention had a high success rate when compared with expectant-management (OR: 4.29 [2.31, 7.97]). The review determines the effect of medical, surgical, and expectant-management procedures on women who have had spontaneous-miscarriages in their first-trimester. PROSPERO-International prospective register of systematic reviews–CRD42020154395.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠头三个月流产的药物、手术和期待管理的 Meta 分析方法
妊娠头三个月流产及其相关并发症的增加对妇女的生活质量造成了一定的负担。流产后需要进行药物、手术和待产护理,以清除子宫内残留的组织。了解这些干预措施的有效性和安全性将提高人们的认识,并成为选择适当治疗方案的决定性因素。本综述旨在确定针对初产妇流产的各种医疗和手术方法的有效性和安全性。本综述纳入了在妊娠头三个月将妇女分配给药物、手术或期待疗法的研究。检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE 和 Embase 图书馆的文献。主要结果是受孕产物完全排出。采用 PRISMA(系统综述和 Meta 分析的首选报告项目)指南对数据进行独立审查、证据质量分级和风险偏倚评估。21篇符合条件的文章被纳入本系统综述,其中包括7931名因早期自然流产而接受药物、手术或期待疗法的患者。与药物干预(OR:16.12 [9.11, 28.52])和期待管理(OR:2.78 [2.13, 3.61])相比,手术干预的成功率更高。而与预期管理相比,医疗干预的成功率较高(OR:4.29 [2.31, 7.97])。该综述确定了药物、手术和期待管理程序对第一胎自然流产妇女的影响。PROSPERO-国际前瞻性系统综述注册-CRD42020154395。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Meta-Analysis Approach on Medical, Surgical and Expectant Management on Abortion of First Trimester Overview of Trauma Injuries Caused by Traffic Accidents in Baixada Santista, Brazil Short Term Regional and Age-Specific Disparities in Suicide Epidemiology in Poland The Italian Society of Medical Statistics and Clinical Epidemiology (SISMEC) Working Group on “Environment, Climate and Health”: topics, aims and perspectives Crack Cocaine Use and Mortality Risk: A Follow-Up Study on 178 Individuals in Drug Treatment for Crack Cocaine Problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1