Communication Strategy in Handling Land Boundary Disputes at the Land Office of Lhokseumawe City

Maisyarah Maisyarah, Humaizi Humaizi, Dewi Kurniawati
{"title":"Communication Strategy in Handling Land Boundary Disputes at the Land Office of Lhokseumawe City","authors":"Maisyarah Maisyarah, Humaizi Humaizi, Dewi Kurniawati","doi":"10.58344/jws.v3i7.662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to determine the communication strategy used by the Dispute Control and Handling Section of the Lhokseumawe City Land Office in managing land boundary disputes. The main theories and concepts used are communication strategy, organizational communication, and persuasive communication. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study method, data collected through observation and interviews with employees involved in handling land boundary disputes. The results of this study found that the Lhokseumawe City Land Office uses a caucus process in its communication strategy in handling disputes, in contrast to the more commonly used direct mediation approach. The stages of dispute handling are in accordance with Hafied Cangara's five-step communication planning model. Analysis of the communication dimensions shows that internal communication occurs both vertically and horizontally through meetings, phone calls, and WhatsApp messages, involving reciprocal exchanges between leaders and employees and between employees. External communication involves the office acting as a facilitator during meetings. Persuasive techniques identified include integration, which involves negotiation, and fear induction, which highlights the potential consequences of unresolved disputes. The implications of this research underscore the importance of structured communication planning and strategy in effective dispute management. The findings suggest that other government agencies may benefit from adopting a similar approach. The use of effective persuasive techniques can improve the efficiency of dispute resolution.","PeriodicalId":515775,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Science","volume":"57 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v3i7.662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to determine the communication strategy used by the Dispute Control and Handling Section of the Lhokseumawe City Land Office in managing land boundary disputes. The main theories and concepts used are communication strategy, organizational communication, and persuasive communication. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study method, data collected through observation and interviews with employees involved in handling land boundary disputes. The results of this study found that the Lhokseumawe City Land Office uses a caucus process in its communication strategy in handling disputes, in contrast to the more commonly used direct mediation approach. The stages of dispute handling are in accordance with Hafied Cangara's five-step communication planning model. Analysis of the communication dimensions shows that internal communication occurs both vertically and horizontally through meetings, phone calls, and WhatsApp messages, involving reciprocal exchanges between leaders and employees and between employees. External communication involves the office acting as a facilitator during meetings. Persuasive techniques identified include integration, which involves negotiation, and fear induction, which highlights the potential consequences of unresolved disputes. The implications of this research underscore the importance of structured communication planning and strategy in effective dispute management. The findings suggest that other government agencies may benefit from adopting a similar approach. The use of effective persuasive techniques can improve the efficiency of dispute resolution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
洛克苏马韦市土地局处理土地边界争端的沟通策略
本研究旨在确定洛克苏马韦市土地局争议控制和处理科在管理土地边界争端时使用的沟通策略。使用的主要理论和概念包括沟通策略、组织沟通和说服沟通。本研究采用个案研究的定性方法,通过对参与处理土地边界争端的员工进行观察和访谈收集数据。研究结果发现,与更常用的直接调解方式相比,洛休马维市土地局在处理纠纷的沟通策略中采用了核心小组程序。争议处理的各个阶段符合哈菲德-坎加拉的五步沟通规划模型。对沟通维度的分析表明,内部沟通是通过会议、电话和 WhatsApp 消息进行的纵向和横向沟通,涉及领导与员工之间以及员工与员工之间的相互交流。外部沟通包括办公室在会议期间充当主持人。所确定的说服技巧包括整合(涉及谈判)和恐惧诱导(强调未解决争端的潜在后果)。这项研究的意义强调了结构化沟通规划和战略在有效管理争端中的重要性。研究结果表明,其他政府机构也可以采用类似的方法。使用有效的说服技巧可以提高争端解决的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Communication Strategy in Handling Land Boundary Disputes at the Land Office of Lhokseumawe City Land Use Change Pattern of Change and Strategy Directions for Spatial Utilization Control in Bogor Regency Factors Influencing Interest in Dive Tourism on Weh Island Communication Identity of Maize Farmers in the Digital Immigrant Group in Accepting Innovation through the Utilization of Digital Petani Apps Building Loyalty in Punti Kayu Palembang: Tourist Satisfaction Mediating Perceived Value, Safety, and Destination Image
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1