Conceptual Foundations of Studying Counter-Discourse in Social Media

Aleksandr A. Krivosheev
{"title":"Conceptual Foundations of Studying Counter-Discourse in Social Media","authors":"Aleksandr A. Krivosheev","doi":"10.24158/pep.2024.7.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the main concepts and theories used in the study of political discourse in social media. It defines the key features of the internet and social networks and their impact on changing communication for-mats. The article addresses the issue of democratization and simultaneous complexity in information pro-cessing for a wide range of users. During the review, the theories of the “global village”, discursive space, in-formation ecology, virtual spaces and media literacy are highlighted. Various concepts assess differently the role and influence of social media on discourse reproduction: from negative evaluations – users become mere consumers of content – to positive ones – users are capable of analyzing and fairly freely constructing political discourses. It is emphasized that social networks offer significant opportunities for countering dominant dis-courses and forming counter-discourses. Conclusion dwells upon the fact that new communication tools pro-vide new avenues for user interaction in creating and discussing political texts.","PeriodicalId":507515,"journal":{"name":"Общество: политика, экономика, право","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Общество: политика, экономика, право","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2024.7.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the main concepts and theories used in the study of political discourse in social media. It defines the key features of the internet and social networks and their impact on changing communication for-mats. The article addresses the issue of democratization and simultaneous complexity in information pro-cessing for a wide range of users. During the review, the theories of the “global village”, discursive space, in-formation ecology, virtual spaces and media literacy are highlighted. Various concepts assess differently the role and influence of social media on discourse reproduction: from negative evaluations – users become mere consumers of content – to positive ones – users are capable of analyzing and fairly freely constructing political discourses. It is emphasized that social networks offer significant opportunities for countering dominant dis-courses and forming counter-discourses. Conclusion dwells upon the fact that new communication tools pro-vide new avenues for user interaction in creating and discussing political texts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究社交媒体中反话语的概念基础
本文探讨了研究社交媒体中的政治言论所使用的主要概念和理论。文章界定了互联网和社交网络的主要特征及其对改变传播方式的影响。文章探讨了为广大用户提供信息的民主化和复杂性问题。在回顾过程中,强调了 "地球村"、话语空间、信息生态学、虚拟空间和媒体素养等理论。各种概念以不同的方式评估了社交媒体对话语再生产的作用和影响:从负面评价--用户成为单纯的内容消费者--到正面评价--用户能够分析并相当自由地构建政治话语。报告强调,社交网络为反驳主流话语和形成反话语提供了重要机会。结论强调,新的通信工具为用户在创建和讨论政治文本时进行互动提供了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Personal Interest in Russian Law: Issues of Conceptualization Improving the Efficiency of Securities Market Operations amid Economic Turbulence German Energy Neocolonialism in the Sub-Saharan States Administrative Reforms as a Solution for Building Democracy in Modern Vietnam Modern Political Myths and Pseudo-Myths in the Aspect of the Theory of Ethnogenesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1