The Concept of “Cultural Hegemony” by A. Gramsci in the Works of the Frankfurt School (M. Horkheimer, T. Adorno, and H. Marcuse)

Yulia A. Malyshko
{"title":"The Concept of “Cultural Hegemony” by A. Gramsci in the Works of the Frankfurt School (M. Horkheimer, T. Adorno, and H. Marcuse)","authors":"Yulia A. Malyshko","doi":"10.24158/pep.2024.7.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the conceptual evolution of Antonio Gramsci’s notion of “cultural hegemony” as interpreted in Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno’s “Dialectic of Enlightenment” and Herbert Marcuse’s “One-Dimensional Man”. Spanning from Karl Marx’s publication of “Capital” in 1867 to Gramsci’s “Prison Notebooks” written in the 1920s and 1930s, over half a century elapsed. The socio-political panorama of their time, coupled with an analysis of the fragmentation of the workers’ movement alongside a communication revolution, ena-bled Gramsci to reformulate Marxist doctrine, introducing a new dimension: the level of mass consciousness and the competition among political forces for its control. These insights formed the basis of the works of the Frankfurt School authors. The aim of this study is to uncover the conceptual transformation of ideas concerning mass consciousness and its influence within the framework of neo-Marxist thought. Additionally, it examines critiques of the cultural industry and the power of brands within mass society.","PeriodicalId":507515,"journal":{"name":"Общество: политика, экономика, право","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Общество: политика, экономика, право","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2024.7.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the conceptual evolution of Antonio Gramsci’s notion of “cultural hegemony” as interpreted in Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno’s “Dialectic of Enlightenment” and Herbert Marcuse’s “One-Dimensional Man”. Spanning from Karl Marx’s publication of “Capital” in 1867 to Gramsci’s “Prison Notebooks” written in the 1920s and 1930s, over half a century elapsed. The socio-political panorama of their time, coupled with an analysis of the fragmentation of the workers’ movement alongside a communication revolution, ena-bled Gramsci to reformulate Marxist doctrine, introducing a new dimension: the level of mass consciousness and the competition among political forces for its control. These insights formed the basis of the works of the Frankfurt School authors. The aim of this study is to uncover the conceptual transformation of ideas concerning mass consciousness and its influence within the framework of neo-Marxist thought. Additionally, it examines critiques of the cultural industry and the power of brands within mass society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法兰克福学派(霍克海默、阿多诺和马尔库塞)作品中的葛兰西 "文化霸权 "概念
文章分析了安东尼奥-葛兰西的 "文化霸权 "概念在马克斯-霍克海默和西奥多-阿多诺的《启蒙辩证法》以及赫伯特-马尔库塞的《一维人》中的演变过程。从 1867 年马克思出版《资本论》到 20 世纪二三十年代葛兰西撰写《狱中笔记》,时间跨度超过半个世纪。他们所处时代的社会政治全景,加上对工人运动在通讯革命中支离破碎的分析,促使葛兰西重新阐释马克思主义学说,并引入了一个新的维度:群众意识的水平以及各种政治力量对其控制权的争夺。这些见解构成了法兰克福学派作家作品的基础。本研究旨在揭示新马克思主义思想框架内有关大众意识的观念转变及其影响。此外,本研究还探讨了大众社会中对文化产业和品牌力量的批判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Personal Interest in Russian Law: Issues of Conceptualization Improving the Efficiency of Securities Market Operations amid Economic Turbulence German Energy Neocolonialism in the Sub-Saharan States Administrative Reforms as a Solution for Building Democracy in Modern Vietnam Modern Political Myths and Pseudo-Myths in the Aspect of the Theory of Ethnogenesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1