Where Do I Go from Here? Evaluating Professional Development in Undergraduate Planning Education

Laura M. Keyes, Lauren Ames Fischer
{"title":"Where Do I Go from Here? Evaluating Professional Development in Undergraduate Planning Education","authors":"Laura M. Keyes, Lauren Ames Fischer","doi":"10.1177/0739456x241260609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban planning education emphasizes professional development and career preparedness. Undergraduate programs can recruit a broader diversity of students to planning but require different approaches to professional development than graduate programs. In this paper, we evaluate existing research on undergraduate and graduate planning education in the United States. Using a survey of undergraduates and an assessment of studio learning outcomes, we explore student perspectives on professional development. Students see value in technical skills and networking but less in community-based projects. We also find that using individual development plans in studio learning helps undergraduate students see the value of ongoing professional development.","PeriodicalId":507823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Planning Education and Research","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Planning Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x241260609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban planning education emphasizes professional development and career preparedness. Undergraduate programs can recruit a broader diversity of students to planning but require different approaches to professional development than graduate programs. In this paper, we evaluate existing research on undergraduate and graduate planning education in the United States. Using a survey of undergraduates and an assessment of studio learning outcomes, we explore student perspectives on professional development. Students see value in technical skills and networking but less in community-based projects. We also find that using individual development plans in studio learning helps undergraduate students see the value of ongoing professional development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
何去何从?评估本科规划教育中的专业发展
城市规划教育强调专业发展和职业准备。本科生项目可以为规划专业招收更多不同类型的学生,但与研究生项目相比,本科生项目需要不同的专业发展方法。在本文中,我们对美国现有的本科生和研究生规划教育研究进行了评估。通过对本科生的调查和对工作室学习成果的评估,我们探讨了学生对专业发展的看法。学生们认为技术技能和人际网络很有价值,但对基于社区的项目则不太认同。我们还发现,在工作室学习中使用个人发展计划有助于本科生看到持续专业发展的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collective Efficacy and Mixed-Tenure Redevelopment: Insights from Toronto’s Regent Park Neighborhood The Urban Context of Rental Housing Development near Major U.S. Universities Where Do I Go from Here? Evaluating Professional Development in Undergraduate Planning Education Beyond Displacement: Political-Gentefiers Planning Their Barrio and Claiming Space Ownership Logistics and Urban Planning: A Review of Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1