{"title":"Meta-Analysis of Effective Management Strategies for Malignant Central Airway Obstruction","authors":"Septriana Putri, Y. Sabri, Fenty Anggrainy","doi":"10.37275/bsm.v8i11.1108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Malignant central airway obstruction (MCAO) significantly impacts the quality of life and prognosis of patients with advanced lung cancer or metastatic disease. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of various management strategies for MCAO. \nMethods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from 2018 to 2024 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing different MCAO management approaches. Primary outcomes included improvement in airway patency, dyspnea scores, and survival. Secondary outcomes included procedural complications and quality-of-life measures. A random-effects model was used to pool data, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. \nResults: A total of 25 studies (15 RCTs, 10 observational studies), encompassing 3456 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Interventions assessed were rigid bronchoscopy with various modalities (e.g., laser therapy, cryotherapy, electrocautery, balloon dilation, stenting), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), brachytherapy, and systemic therapy. Rigid bronchoscopy: Significantly improved airway patency and dyspnea scores compared to supportive care alone (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.95-4.18; p<0.001). Stenting: Demonstrated superior airway patency and symptom relief compared to other bronchoscopic interventions (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.21-2.48; p=0.003). EBRT/Brachytherapy: Offered moderate symptom improvement but with higher complication rates than bronchoscopic interventions (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.85; p=0.021). Systemic therapy (chemotherapy/immunotherapy): Provided limited benefit in terms of airway patency but may impact overall survival in specific tumor types. \nConclusion: Rigid bronchoscopy, particularly with stenting, is the most effective initial management strategy for MCAO, providing rapid symptom relief and airway recanalization. EBRT/brachytherapy can be considered as adjuncts or alternatives in select cases. Further research is needed to determine the optimal combination and sequencing of therapies for different tumor types and stages.","PeriodicalId":503226,"journal":{"name":"Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research","volume":"33 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v8i11.1108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Malignant central airway obstruction (MCAO) significantly impacts the quality of life and prognosis of patients with advanced lung cancer or metastatic disease. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of various management strategies for MCAO.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from 2018 to 2024 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing different MCAO management approaches. Primary outcomes included improvement in airway patency, dyspnea scores, and survival. Secondary outcomes included procedural complications and quality-of-life measures. A random-effects model was used to pool data, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.
Results: A total of 25 studies (15 RCTs, 10 observational studies), encompassing 3456 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Interventions assessed were rigid bronchoscopy with various modalities (e.g., laser therapy, cryotherapy, electrocautery, balloon dilation, stenting), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), brachytherapy, and systemic therapy. Rigid bronchoscopy: Significantly improved airway patency and dyspnea scores compared to supportive care alone (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.95-4.18; p<0.001). Stenting: Demonstrated superior airway patency and symptom relief compared to other bronchoscopic interventions (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.21-2.48; p=0.003). EBRT/Brachytherapy: Offered moderate symptom improvement but with higher complication rates than bronchoscopic interventions (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.85; p=0.021). Systemic therapy (chemotherapy/immunotherapy): Provided limited benefit in terms of airway patency but may impact overall survival in specific tumor types.
Conclusion: Rigid bronchoscopy, particularly with stenting, is the most effective initial management strategy for MCAO, providing rapid symptom relief and airway recanalization. EBRT/brachytherapy can be considered as adjuncts or alternatives in select cases. Further research is needed to determine the optimal combination and sequencing of therapies for different tumor types and stages.
背景:恶性中央气道阻塞(MCAO)严重影响晚期肺癌或转移性疾病患者的生活质量和预后。本荟萃分析旨在评估各种MCAO治疗策略的有效性和安全性。方法:对2018年至2024年的PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行了系统检索,以确定比较不同MCAO管理方法的随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究。主要结果包括气道通畅性改善、呼吸困难评分和存活率。次要结果包括手术并发症和生活质量指标。采用随机效应模型汇总数据,并使用 I² 统计量评估异质性。结果:共有25项研究(15项研究性临床试验、10项观察性研究)被纳入荟萃分析,涉及3456名患者。评估的干预措施包括硬质支气管镜检查与各种方式(如激光治疗、冷冻治疗、电灼、球囊扩张、支架植入)、体外放射治疗(EBRT)、近距离放射治疗和全身治疗。硬质支气管镜检查:与单纯支持治疗相比,气道通畅率和呼吸困难评分显著改善(OR 2.86,95% CI 1.95-4.18;P<0.001)。支架植入术:与其他支气管镜干预相比,气道通畅率和症状缓解率更优(OR 1.73,95% CI 1.21-2.48;P=0.003)。EBRT/近距离放射治疗:可适度改善症状,但并发症发生率高于支气管镜介入疗法(OR 1.39,95% CI 1.05-1.85;P=0.021)。全身治疗(化疗/免疫治疗):对气道通畅性的益处有限,但可能会影响特定肿瘤类型的总体生存率。结论硬质支气管镜检查,尤其是支架植入术,是 MCAO 最有效的初始治疗策略,可迅速缓解症状并重新疏通气道。在特定病例中,EBRT/近距离放射治疗可作为辅助手段或替代方法。需要进一步研究确定不同肿瘤类型和分期的最佳治疗组合和顺序。