From minimum-viable-products to full models: a step-wise development of diagnostic forward models in support of design, analysis and modelling on the ST40 tokamak

M. Sertoli, A. Alieva, P. F. Buxton, Aleksei Dnestrovskii, Michael Gemmell, Hazel Lowe, Thomas O'Gorman, Dmitry Osin, A. Sladkomedova, J. Varje, H. Willett, Jonathan Wood, B. Lomanowski, Ephrem Delabie, Oleksandr Marchuk, E. Litherland-Smith, Kingsley Collie, Sanket Gadgil
{"title":"From minimum-viable-products to full models: a step-wise development of diagnostic forward models in support of design, analysis and modelling on the ST40 tokamak","authors":"M. Sertoli, A. Alieva, P. F. Buxton, Aleksei Dnestrovskii, Michael Gemmell, Hazel Lowe, Thomas O'Gorman, Dmitry Osin, A. Sladkomedova, J. Varje, H. Willett, Jonathan Wood, B. Lomanowski, Ephrem Delabie, Oleksandr Marchuk, E. Litherland-Smith, Kingsley Collie, Sanket Gadgil","doi":"10.1088/1361-6587/ad668f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Like most magnetic confined fusion experiments, the ST40 tokamak started off with a small subset of diagnostics and gradually increased the diagnostic set to include more complex and comprehensive systems. To make the most of each operational phase, forward models of various diagnostics are used and developed to aid design, provide consistency-checks during commissioning, test analysis methods, and build workflows to constrain high-level parameters to inform interpretation, theory and modelling. For new models and new analysis workflows, minimum-viable-products (MVP) are released early, and their complexity is increased in a step-wise manner, facilitating the support of all programme phases on multiple parallel applications, while enabling learning opportunities and feedback loops. In this contribution we review the philosophy, scope and architecture of the framework under development. We discuss the details of some forward models, with examples on how they are used to aid diagnostic design, to investigate analysis methodologies through synthetic data, and how they are embedded in experimental analysis workflows. We compare previously published experimental results with new, more advanced analysis workflows employing more recent, detailed models and new diagnostic data, providing confirmation of the published material from the 2021-22 experimental campaign.","PeriodicalId":510623,"journal":{"name":"Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion","volume":"124 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ad668f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Like most magnetic confined fusion experiments, the ST40 tokamak started off with a small subset of diagnostics and gradually increased the diagnostic set to include more complex and comprehensive systems. To make the most of each operational phase, forward models of various diagnostics are used and developed to aid design, provide consistency-checks during commissioning, test analysis methods, and build workflows to constrain high-level parameters to inform interpretation, theory and modelling. For new models and new analysis workflows, minimum-viable-products (MVP) are released early, and their complexity is increased in a step-wise manner, facilitating the support of all programme phases on multiple parallel applications, while enabling learning opportunities and feedback loops. In this contribution we review the philosophy, scope and architecture of the framework under development. We discuss the details of some forward models, with examples on how they are used to aid diagnostic design, to investigate analysis methodologies through synthetic data, and how they are embedded in experimental analysis workflows. We compare previously published experimental results with new, more advanced analysis workflows employing more recent, detailed models and new diagnostic data, providing confirmation of the published material from the 2021-22 experimental campaign.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从最小可行产品到完整模型:逐步发展诊断前向模型,以支持 ST40 托卡马克的设计、分析和建模工作
与大多数磁约束聚变实验一样,ST40 托卡马克一开始只有一小部分诊断设备,后来逐渐增加诊断设备,以包括更复杂、更全面的系统。为了充分利用每个运行阶段,使用和开发了各种诊断的前沿模型,以帮助设计、在调试期间提供一致性检查、测试分析方法,并建立工作流程来限制高级参数,为解释、理论和建模提供信息。对于新模型和新分析工作流程,最低可行产品(MVP)会尽早发布,其复杂性会逐步提高,从而为多个并行应用的所有计划阶段提供支持,同时提供学习机会和反馈回路。在本文中,我们回顾了正在开发的框架的理念、范围和架构。我们讨论了一些前瞻性模型的细节,并举例说明了这些模型如何用于辅助诊断设计、通过合成数据研究分析方法,以及如何将它们嵌入到实验分析工作流程中。我们将以前公布的实验结果与新的、更先进的分析工作流程进行了比较,新的分析工作流程采用了更新颖、更详细的模型和新的诊断数据,对 2021-22 年实验活动中公布的材料进行了确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel identification algorithm for plasma boundary gap based on visible endoscope diagnostic on EAST tokamak MANTA: A Negative-Triangularity NASEM-compliant fusion pilot plant Parsimonious statistical techniques for the detection of drifts toward dangerous operational conditions in tokamaks Cold ion effects in density-asymmetric collisionless magnetic reconnection From minimum-viable-products to full models: a step-wise development of diagnostic forward models in support of design, analysis and modelling on the ST40 tokamak
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1