Backlash, white privilege and anger: Resistance to the equality, diversity and inclusion agenda in the British television industry

David Lee
{"title":"Backlash, white privilege and anger: Resistance to the equality, diversity and inclusion agenda in the British television industry","authors":"David Lee","doi":"10.1177/13675494241261812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the manifestation and dissemination of reactionary attitudes and discourses within the British television production community, explicitly and implicitly opposing the equality, diversity and inclusion agenda that has gained prominence in recent years. Utilising anonymous, in-depth qualitative interviews with 14 white, male, able-bodied, neurotypical and heterosexual industry professionals, predominantly from middle- or upper-class backgrounds, working in various production roles around London, the study explores their perspectives on the equality, diversity and inclusion agenda within both the industry and broader society. The research sheds light on pockets within the screen industries where awareness of social and male ‘white privilege’ is lacking. Positioned within the context of increased diversity and inclusion initiatives, the article critically analyses the growing circulation of ‘diversity backlash’ narratives. It aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of resistance to equality, diversity and inclusion initiatives within the industry, advocating for informed challenges to these attitudes. The article explores connections between anti-diversity discourses in the media industry and wider societal discourses on race, gender and identity. By examining links to meritocratic and individualistic narratives around ‘hard work’, individualism and ‘fairness’, the research contributes to the socio-cultural analysis of how equality, diversity and inclusion initiatives are experienced within the screen industries. The study explores diversity fatigue and white privilege framed within the ideology of meritocracy, to investigate the dynamics of resistance and opposition to equality, diversity and inclusion measures. It highlights the need for an understanding of these discourses to successfully embed equality, diversity and inclusion agendas within media institutions and practices, particularly in the face of societal and industry-wide resistance. The research concludes by emphasising the systemic resistance within privileged pockets of the screen industries, calling for a deeper examination of the emergence and circulation of reactionary discourses that may impede the progress of essential equality, diversity and inclusion programmes and activities within the cultural economy.","PeriodicalId":502446,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"129 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494241261812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the manifestation and dissemination of reactionary attitudes and discourses within the British television production community, explicitly and implicitly opposing the equality, diversity and inclusion agenda that has gained prominence in recent years. Utilising anonymous, in-depth qualitative interviews with 14 white, male, able-bodied, neurotypical and heterosexual industry professionals, predominantly from middle- or upper-class backgrounds, working in various production roles around London, the study explores their perspectives on the equality, diversity and inclusion agenda within both the industry and broader society. The research sheds light on pockets within the screen industries where awareness of social and male ‘white privilege’ is lacking. Positioned within the context of increased diversity and inclusion initiatives, the article critically analyses the growing circulation of ‘diversity backlash’ narratives. It aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of resistance to equality, diversity and inclusion initiatives within the industry, advocating for informed challenges to these attitudes. The article explores connections between anti-diversity discourses in the media industry and wider societal discourses on race, gender and identity. By examining links to meritocratic and individualistic narratives around ‘hard work’, individualism and ‘fairness’, the research contributes to the socio-cultural analysis of how equality, diversity and inclusion initiatives are experienced within the screen industries. The study explores diversity fatigue and white privilege framed within the ideology of meritocracy, to investigate the dynamics of resistance and opposition to equality, diversity and inclusion measures. It highlights the need for an understanding of these discourses to successfully embed equality, diversity and inclusion agendas within media institutions and practices, particularly in the face of societal and industry-wide resistance. The research concludes by emphasising the systemic resistance within privileged pockets of the screen industries, calling for a deeper examination of the emergence and circulation of reactionary discourses that may impede the progress of essential equality, diversity and inclusion programmes and activities within the cultural economy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反弹、白人特权和愤怒:英国电视业对平等、多样性和包容性议程的抵制
本文调查了反动态度和言论在英国电视制作界的表现和传播情况,这些反动态度和言论明里暗里反对近年来日益突出的平等、多样性和包容性议程。本研究采用匿名、深入的定性访谈方式,采访了 14 位白人、男性、健全、神经质和异性恋的业内专业人士,他们主要来自中产阶级或上层社会,在伦敦周边从事各种制作工作。本研究探讨了他们对业内和更广泛社会中的平等、多样性和包容性议程的看法。这项研究揭示了银幕行业中缺乏社会和男性 "白人特权 "意识的领域。在多元化和包容性倡议不断加强的背景下,文章批判性地分析了 "多元化反弹 "论调的不断流传。文章旨在加深对行业内抵制平等、多样性和包容性倡议的理解,倡导在知情的情况下挑战这些态度。文章探讨了媒体行业中的反多元化论述与更广泛的社会种族、性别和身份论述之间的联系。通过研究与围绕 "努力工作"、个人主义和 "公平 "的功利主义和个人主义叙事之间的联系,该研究有助于对平等、多样性和包容性举措在银幕行业中的体验进行社会文化分析。本研究探讨了在任人唯贤的意识形态下的多样性疲劳和白人特权,以调查抵制和反对平等、多样性和包容性措施的动力。研究强调,要想在媒体机构和实践中成功嵌入平等、多样性和包容性议程,就必须了解这些论述,尤其是在面对社会和整个行业的抵制时。研究最后强调了银幕产业特权区内的系统性阻力,呼吁对反动言论的出现和传播进行更深入的研究,这些言论可能会阻碍文化经济中重要的平等、多样性和包容性计划与活动的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The transgender space invader: Out of time and out of affect Representation of climate change and global warming in comics: From apocalyptic fiction to educational tool Challengers: A cultural studies commentary on the fire and ice of filmic desires ‘I think it takes balls, girl balls, to challenge those stereotypes’: Women’s perceptions of board game culture ‘The small girl with the huge dildo is what we needed’: The politics of sex toy in Cocks Not Glocks protest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1