Internet-Based Trauma Recovery Intervention for Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Sunah Kim, Jinyoung Park, Wongyeong Lee, Goun Kim
{"title":"Internet-Based Trauma Recovery Intervention for Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Sunah Kim, Jinyoung Park, Wongyeong Lee, Goun Kim","doi":"10.1159/000540350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Nurses, who care for patients with various traumas, may also experience post-traumatic stress disorder due to indirect or direct exposure to traumatic situations. This study examined the effectiveness of an Internet-based trauma recovery intervention for Korean nurses.\nMethods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted with 112 nurses aged 23–40 years who were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 56) or control group (n = 56) from May 7 to December 20, 2020. Nurses in the intervention group attended eight sessions, and the same intervention was administered to the control group. Repeated measures were collected at pre-test, post-test 1 (immediately after the intervention), and post-test 2 (four weeks after the intervention). A total of 102 nurses (intervention group: n = 49; control group: n = 53) were completed because 10 nurses dropped out before the first session. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and repeated measures ANOVA (intention-to-treat and per protocol).\nResults: There were significant changes in functional health, resilience, post-traumatic stress, depressive symptoms, state anxiety, and trait anxiety over time and in the group-by-time interactions (intention-to-treat and per protocol). There was a significant difference in social support in the group-by-time interactions, but there were no significant changes between the two groups or over time (intention-to-treat and per protocol).\nConclusion: The Internet-based trauma recovery nursing intervention is effective in clinical and community settings for nurses who cannot participate in fixed-schedule programs due to shift work. This study’s findings are relevant for implementing Internet-based trauma recovery programs for nurses and the general population, including survivors and relatives of patients who suffered from COVID-19. This program will also be very useful for people in other high-stress situations. Nurse leaders should consider different populations and situations when offering effective coping strategies suitable for changing environments.\nClinical trial registration number: NCT04989582","PeriodicalId":72654,"journal":{"name":"Complex psychiatry","volume":"13 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nurses, who care for patients with various traumas, may also experience post-traumatic stress disorder due to indirect or direct exposure to traumatic situations. This study examined the effectiveness of an Internet-based trauma recovery intervention for Korean nurses. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted with 112 nurses aged 23–40 years who were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 56) or control group (n = 56) from May 7 to December 20, 2020. Nurses in the intervention group attended eight sessions, and the same intervention was administered to the control group. Repeated measures were collected at pre-test, post-test 1 (immediately after the intervention), and post-test 2 (four weeks after the intervention). A total of 102 nurses (intervention group: n = 49; control group: n = 53) were completed because 10 nurses dropped out before the first session. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and repeated measures ANOVA (intention-to-treat and per protocol). Results: There were significant changes in functional health, resilience, post-traumatic stress, depressive symptoms, state anxiety, and trait anxiety over time and in the group-by-time interactions (intention-to-treat and per protocol). There was a significant difference in social support in the group-by-time interactions, but there were no significant changes between the two groups or over time (intention-to-treat and per protocol). Conclusion: The Internet-based trauma recovery nursing intervention is effective in clinical and community settings for nurses who cannot participate in fixed-schedule programs due to shift work. This study’s findings are relevant for implementing Internet-based trauma recovery programs for nurses and the general population, including survivors and relatives of patients who suffered from COVID-19. This program will also be very useful for people in other high-stress situations. Nurse leaders should consider different populations and situations when offering effective coping strategies suitable for changing environments. Clinical trial registration number: NCT04989582
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于互联网的护士创伤恢复干预:随机对照试验
导言:护士在护理遭受各种创伤的患者时,也可能因间接或直接暴露于创伤环境而出现创伤后应激障碍。本研究探讨了针对韩国护士的基于互联网的创伤恢复干预的有效性:这项随机对照试验于 2020 年 5 月 7 日至 12 月 20 日进行,共有 112 名年龄在 23-40 岁之间的护士参加,他们被随机分配到干预组(56 人)或对照组(56 人)。干预组的护士参加了八次课程,对照组的护士也接受了同样的干预。在测试前、测试后 1(干预后立即)和测试后 2(干预后四周)收集重复测量数据。共有 102 名护士(干预组:n = 49;对照组:n = 53)完成了测试,因为有 10 名护士在第一次测试前退出了测试。数据分析采用了卡方检验、费雪精确检验、t 检验、曼-惠特尼 U 检验和重复测量方差分析(意向治疗和按方案):结果:功能性健康、复原力、创伤后应激反应、抑郁症状、状态焦虑和特质焦虑随着时间的推移和组间时间的交互作用(意向治疗和按方案治疗)均有明显变化。在逐组逐时的交互作用中,社会支持存在显著差异,但两组之间或随着时间的推移(意向治疗和按方案治疗)没有显著变化:基于互联网的创伤恢复护理干预在临床和社区环境中对那些因轮班工作而无法参加固定计划的护士是有效的。这项研究的结果对于为护士和普通人群(包括 COVID-19 患者的幸存者和亲属)实施基于互联网的创伤恢复计划具有重要意义。该计划对其他高压力环境下的人群也非常有用。护士长在提供适合不断变化的环境的有效应对策略时,应考虑不同的人群和情况:临床试验注册号:NCT04989582
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Systematic Review of Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) 677C>T and 1298A>C Variants and Treatment-Resistant Depression: Insights for Precision Psychiatry. Severe Anxiety, Stress, and Depression according to Life Satisfaction among Residents of Latin America. Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Arabic Translation of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale. Developmental Selective GSK3α Inhibition Rescues Working Memory Deficits in a Mouse Model of Schizophrenia Predisposition. Development of the Comprehensive Addiction Risk Evaluation System: Initial Participant Response to an Online Personalized Feedback Program Integrating Genomic, Behavioral, and Environmental Risk Information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1