Old Tatar heritage in the Tepekey and Kurmantau sub-dialects of the Tatar language (phonetic and morphological features)

M. R. Bulatova
{"title":"Old Tatar heritage in the Tepekey and Kurmantau sub-dialects of the Tatar language (phonetic and morphological features)","authors":"M. R. Bulatova","doi":"10.30853/phil20240322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the development of the Tatar literary language some traditional forms, that are characteristic of the Old Tatar literary language had been lost, but they were preserved in sub-dialects and are considered as dialect phenomena. The purpose of the study is to identify features that were characteristic of the Old Tatar literary language and were preserved in the tepekey and kurmantau sub-dialects, but were lost in the Tatar literary language. The main phonetic, grammatical and other features of the studied sub-dialects of the Tatar language were laid down in the ancient Turkic language, the written monuments of which date back to the 5-8th centuries. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the fact that for the first time, some phonetic and morphological features of the indicated sub-dialects are considered in a comparative sense with the language of the Old Tatar written monuments, and a greater commonality with the Old Tatar literary language is revealed. As a result of the scientific analysis, we have established that in the Kurmantau and Tepekey sub-dialects of the middle dialect of the Tatar language, phonetic phenomena (ä~i, j~ʒ, etc.) and grammatical forms (affixes of the desired mood -ajïm/-ajïk, forms in -mak/-mäk, constructions -dï + isä, etc.), that actively functioned in the Old Tatar literary language have been preserved.","PeriodicalId":508324,"journal":{"name":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","volume":"16 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the development of the Tatar literary language some traditional forms, that are characteristic of the Old Tatar literary language had been lost, but they were preserved in sub-dialects and are considered as dialect phenomena. The purpose of the study is to identify features that were characteristic of the Old Tatar literary language and were preserved in the tepekey and kurmantau sub-dialects, but were lost in the Tatar literary language. The main phonetic, grammatical and other features of the studied sub-dialects of the Tatar language were laid down in the ancient Turkic language, the written monuments of which date back to the 5-8th centuries. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the fact that for the first time, some phonetic and morphological features of the indicated sub-dialects are considered in a comparative sense with the language of the Old Tatar written monuments, and a greater commonality with the Old Tatar literary language is revealed. As a result of the scientific analysis, we have established that in the Kurmantau and Tepekey sub-dialects of the middle dialect of the Tatar language, phonetic phenomena (ä~i, j~ʒ, etc.) and grammatical forms (affixes of the desired mood -ajïm/-ajïk, forms in -mak/-mäk, constructions -dï + isä, etc.), that actively functioned in the Old Tatar literary language have been preserved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鞑靼语 Tepekey 和 Kurmantau 子方言中的古老鞑靼遗产(语音和形态特征)
在鞑靼文学语言的发展过程中,旧鞑靼文学语言所特有的一些传统形式已经消失,但它们在次方言中得以保留,并被视为方言现象。本研究的目的是确定旧鞑靼文学语言的特征,这些特征在特佩基和库尔曼陶子方言中得以保留,但在鞑靼文学语言中却消失了。所研究的鞑靼语次方言的主要语音、语法和其他特征是在古突厥语中形成的,其文字古迹可追溯到 5-8 世纪。该研究的科学新颖性在于,首次将所研究的次方言的一些语音和形态特征与古鞑靼文字古迹中的语言进行了比较研究,并揭示了与古鞑靼文学语言的更大共性。通过科学分析,我们确定在鞑靼语中间方言的库尔曼套语和特佩基语子方言中,保留了在旧鞑靼文学语言中积极发挥作用的语音现象(ä~i、j~ʒ等)和语法形式(所需语气的词缀-ajïm/-ajïk、-mak/-mäk 形式、结构-dï + isä等)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomy of the sonnet "Don Juan" by N. S. Gumilev Scientific review of the academic publication: Zevakhina T. S. Linguosemiotic analysis of Russian artistic discourse. Moscow: MAKS Press, 2023. 72 p. The role of musical ecphrasis in the works of A. I. Kuprin in the late 80s - early 90s of the 19th century Chronotope of the border in the story of A. N. Tolstoy "The Viper" Concept SOLDIER in Russian and Chinese linguistic worldviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1