Self, Physician, and Specialty: A Qualitative Exploration of Medical Students’ Specialty Identity Formation During Undergraduate Medical Training

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1097/acm.0000000000005818
C. Schrepel, Ashley E Amick, M. Bann, Bjorn K Watsjold, J. Ilgen, Joshua Jauregui
{"title":"Self, Physician, and Specialty: A Qualitative Exploration of Medical Students’ Specialty Identity Formation During Undergraduate Medical Training","authors":"C. Schrepel, Ashley E Amick, M. Bann, Bjorn K Watsjold, J. Ilgen, Joshua Jauregui","doi":"10.1097/acm.0000000000005818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n A physician's specialty is an integral part of their professional identity formation (PIF), not only determining the role they play in patient care but also shaping group interactions in the workplace. Prior work on PIF in medical students has focused on the development of a physician identity. However, little is known about how medical students might begin to develop divergent specialty-specific identities during medical school. Consequently, the authors aimed to explore how the process of specialty selection shapes PIF during undergraduate medical training and to develop a construct of specialty identity formation (SIF) as an important aspect of PIF.\n \n \n \n The authors used a constructivist grounded theory approach to explore SIF in senior medical students at the University of Washington between August 2022 and January 2023. The author team consisted of 5 attending physicians. Two investigators conducted hour-long, semistructured interviews, which were audio recorded, transcribed, and deidentified. After analysis, member checking was completed with 2 participants.\n \n \n \n The authors interviewed 14 students and categorized the data into 3 phases: nascent understanding, experiential grounding, and projecting forward. Participants reflected on considering their personal values, while simultaneously exploring the values and defining features of various specialty groups. Early impressions were formed based on ideas influenced by peers and mentors and later integrated with experiences on clinical rotations. Finally, participants noted engaging in a process projecting forward as they attempted to envision their potential futures as both physicians and members of a specialty group.\n \n \n \n As students explore their specialty identity, they use self-anchoring and self-stereotyping to integrate components of their evolving specialty identity into their professional identity. However, uncertainty regarding their fit with a specialty persists for many. Many sociocultural aspects of the learning environment affect SIF, including threats to psychological and identity safety.\n","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000005818","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A physician's specialty is an integral part of their professional identity formation (PIF), not only determining the role they play in patient care but also shaping group interactions in the workplace. Prior work on PIF in medical students has focused on the development of a physician identity. However, little is known about how medical students might begin to develop divergent specialty-specific identities during medical school. Consequently, the authors aimed to explore how the process of specialty selection shapes PIF during undergraduate medical training and to develop a construct of specialty identity formation (SIF) as an important aspect of PIF. The authors used a constructivist grounded theory approach to explore SIF in senior medical students at the University of Washington between August 2022 and January 2023. The author team consisted of 5 attending physicians. Two investigators conducted hour-long, semistructured interviews, which were audio recorded, transcribed, and deidentified. After analysis, member checking was completed with 2 participants. The authors interviewed 14 students and categorized the data into 3 phases: nascent understanding, experiential grounding, and projecting forward. Participants reflected on considering their personal values, while simultaneously exploring the values and defining features of various specialty groups. Early impressions were formed based on ideas influenced by peers and mentors and later integrated with experiences on clinical rotations. Finally, participants noted engaging in a process projecting forward as they attempted to envision their potential futures as both physicians and members of a specialty group. As students explore their specialty identity, they use self-anchoring and self-stereotyping to integrate components of their evolving specialty identity into their professional identity. However, uncertainty regarding their fit with a specialty persists for many. Many sociocultural aspects of the learning environment affect SIF, including threats to psychological and identity safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我、医生和专业:医学生在本科医学培训期间形成专科身份的定性探索
医生的专业是其职业身份形成(PIF)不可分割的一部分,不仅决定了他们在病人护理中所扮演的角色,也影响了工作场所的群体互动。之前有关医学生职业认同形成的研究主要集中在医生职业认同的发展上。然而,人们对医学生如何在医学院期间开始形成不同的特定专业身份却知之甚少。因此,作者旨在探索本科医学培训期间的专业选择过程如何塑造 PIF,并将专业身份形成(SIF)作为 PIF 的一个重要方面进行构建。 作者采用建构主义基础理论方法,探讨了 2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 1 月期间华盛顿大学高年级医学生的 SIF。作者团队由 5 名主治医师组成。两名研究人员进行了长达一小时的半结构式访谈,访谈过程经过录音、转录和去身份化处理。分析结束后,对 2 名参与者进行了成员核对。 作者对 14 名学生进行了访谈,并将数据分为 3 个阶段:萌芽理解、经验基础和预测未来。参与者在思考个人价值观的同时,也在探索不同专业群体的价值观和定义特征。早期的印象是根据受同伴和导师影响的想法形成的,后来与临床轮转的经验相结合。最后,学员们指出,他们在尝试设想自己作为医生和专业团体成员的潜在未来时,参与了一个向前预测的过程。 当学生探索自己的专业身份时,他们会使用自我定位和自我定型的方法,将其不断发展的专业身份的组成部分融入其专业身份中。然而,许多学生仍然无法确定自己是否适合某个专业。学习环境的许多社会文化方面都会影响 SIF,包括对心理和身份安全的威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
In Reply to McBride and Walsh. A Critical Look at Racism in the Clinical Learning Environment and the Erasure of DEI Efforts. Championing Civility in the Clinical Learning Environment: Evaluation of a Novel Training Program. Simulation vs RISE UP: A Comparative Study of Approaches for Teaching Emergency Medicine Trainees How to Manage Microaggressions. The Potential of Using ChatGPT-4 Vision for Detecting Image Manipulation in Academic Medicine Articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1