Evaluating Patient Perceptions of Smartphone Use for Active and Passive Collection of Health Data

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Current Orthopaedic Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1097/bco.0000000000001279
Colin O’Neill, Elizabeth A. Duckworth, Romil Shah, Prakash Jayakumar
{"title":"Evaluating Patient Perceptions of Smartphone Use for Active and Passive Collection of Health Data","authors":"Colin O’Neill, Elizabeth A. Duckworth, Romil Shah, Prakash Jayakumar","doi":"10.1097/bco.0000000000001279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The objectives of this study are to assess patient willingness to share smartphone generated health data with providers and to characterize patient populations who express hesitation around providing these data to providers.\n \n \n \n Bivariate analysis involved unpaired t-test or analysis of variance for comparing continuous variables. An alpha value of 0.05 was used. A multivariable regression to investigate demographic factors associated with comfort with sharing health data was performed. Odds ratios compared participants by age group, educational attainment, and race.\n \n \n \n A total of 485 participants completed the survey, with an average age of 38 years old. Respondents were 65% male and 73% Caucasian. The majority (70%) of participants were comfortable answering questions about their health on their phone, as well as sending pictures of their health problems or wounds. Over half of participants were comfortable with passive social and physical activity information being sent to their doctor and would allow their doctors to download a data tracking application on their smartphone (55% and 59%, respectively). Younger participants (OR 2.0, P<0.05) and participants with increased education (OR 2.5, P < 0.01) were more likely to be comfortable in sharing their data. Privacy concerns were cited as the most common reason patients desired to refrain from sharing data.\n \n \n \n Most study participants were comfortable sharing smartphone generated health data.\n","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bco.0000000000001279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to assess patient willingness to share smartphone generated health data with providers and to characterize patient populations who express hesitation around providing these data to providers. Bivariate analysis involved unpaired t-test or analysis of variance for comparing continuous variables. An alpha value of 0.05 was used. A multivariable regression to investigate demographic factors associated with comfort with sharing health data was performed. Odds ratios compared participants by age group, educational attainment, and race. A total of 485 participants completed the survey, with an average age of 38 years old. Respondents were 65% male and 73% Caucasian. The majority (70%) of participants were comfortable answering questions about their health on their phone, as well as sending pictures of their health problems or wounds. Over half of participants were comfortable with passive social and physical activity information being sent to their doctor and would allow their doctors to download a data tracking application on their smartphone (55% and 59%, respectively). Younger participants (OR 2.0, P<0.05) and participants with increased education (OR 2.5, P < 0.01) were more likely to be comfortable in sharing their data. Privacy concerns were cited as the most common reason patients desired to refrain from sharing data. Most study participants were comfortable sharing smartphone generated health data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估患者对使用智能手机主动和被动收集健康数据的看法
本研究的目的是评估患者与医疗服务提供者共享智能手机生成的健康数据的意愿,并了解在向医疗服务提供者提供这些数据时表示犹豫不决的患者群体的特征。 双变量分析采用非配对 t 检验或方差分析来比较连续变量。采用的阿尔法值为 0.05。我们进行了多变量回归,以调查与是否乐于共享健康数据相关的人口统计学因素。对不同年龄组、教育程度和种族的参与者进行了比率比较。 共有 485 名参与者完成了调查,平均年龄为 38 岁。受访者中 65% 为男性,73% 为白种人。大多数受访者(70%)愿意用手机回答有关自己健康的问题,也愿意发送自己健康问题或伤口的照片。超过半数的参与者愿意将被动社交和体育锻炼信息发送给医生,并允许医生在智能手机上下载数据跟踪应用程序(分别为 55% 和 59%)。较年轻的参与者(OR 2.0,P<0.05)和教育程度较高的参与者(OR 2.5,P<0.01)更愿意分享自己的数据。隐私问题是患者不愿共享数据的最常见原因。 大多数研究参与者乐于分享智能手机生成的健康数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Patient Perceptions of Smartphone Use for Active and Passive Collection of Health Data National basketball association slam dunk contest participation does not lead to increased injury risk or adversely affect player performance JournalADE: Creation and validation of a novel program for automated data extraction (ADE) to assess authorship gender representation Percutaneous fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation in treatment of medial malleolus fracture WALANT office based endoscopic cubital tunnel release
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1