Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the Ergonomic Screening and Prioritization Tool to assess the risk level of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in nurses

Rahgoshay N, Daneshmandi H, Vali M, Shahbazi M, Sadeghian R
{"title":"Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the Ergonomic Screening and Prioritization Tool to assess the risk level of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in nurses","authors":"Rahgoshay N, Daneshmandi H, Vali M, Shahbazi M, Sadeghian R","doi":"10.18502/tkj.v16i2.16091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) are among the most common occupational diseases, and ergonomics and occupational health engineering specialists need reliable and valid methods for assessing high-risk activities and the factors contributing to their occurrence. \nMaterials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 100 nurses employed at Namazi Hospital in Shiraz were randomly selected. Data was collected using a demographic/occupational questionnaire, Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA), and the Ergonomics Screening and Prioritizing Tool (ESPT). Three observers simultaneously assessed the risk of developing MSDs for each job duty. After a six-month interval, the same observers re-evaluated the same group of nurses in the same work Postures. To assess the reliability of ESPT between and within observers, the Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and the Kappa Multi-rater Fleiss method were used. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software version 26. \nResults: The results of the study showed a high agreement between each observer as well as between the three observers before and after six months. The ICC for observers 1, 2, and 3 were respectively 0.951, 0.947, and 0.927, and also between each of the three observers for the first and second time respectively 0.955 and 0.941. \nConclusion: The ESPT has been shown to possess high reliability for assessing the risk of developing MSDs among nurses, and it can be used for this purpose.","PeriodicalId":19452,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine","volume":"25 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/tkj.v16i2.16091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) are among the most common occupational diseases, and ergonomics and occupational health engineering specialists need reliable and valid methods for assessing high-risk activities and the factors contributing to their occurrence. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 100 nurses employed at Namazi Hospital in Shiraz were randomly selected. Data was collected using a demographic/occupational questionnaire, Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA), and the Ergonomics Screening and Prioritizing Tool (ESPT). Three observers simultaneously assessed the risk of developing MSDs for each job duty. After a six-month interval, the same observers re-evaluated the same group of nurses in the same work Postures. To assess the reliability of ESPT between and within observers, the Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and the Kappa Multi-rater Fleiss method were used. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software version 26. Results: The results of the study showed a high agreement between each observer as well as between the three observers before and after six months. The ICC for observers 1, 2, and 3 were respectively 0.951, 0.947, and 0.927, and also between each of the three observers for the first and second time respectively 0.955 and 0.941. Conclusion: The ESPT has been shown to possess high reliability for assessing the risk of developing MSDs among nurses, and it can be used for this purpose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用人体工程学筛查和优先排序工具评估护士工作相关肌肉骨骼疾病风险水平的观察者之间和观察者内部的可靠性
导言:肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)是最常见的职业病之一,工效学和职业健康工程专家需要可靠有效的方法来评估高风险活动及其发生因素。材料和方法:在这项横断面研究中,随机抽取了设拉子市纳马齐医院的 100 名护士。使用人口统计学/职业调查问卷、层次任务分析(HTA)和人体工程学筛选与优先排序工具(ESPT)收集数据。三名观察员同时对每项工作职责的 MSD 风险进行评估。间隔 6 个月后,同样的观察者重新评估了同一组护士的相同工作姿势。为评估观察者之间和观察者内部ESPT的可靠性,采用了类内相关系数(ICC)和Kappa多评分弗莱斯法。数据分析采用 SPSS 软件 26 版进行。结果研究结果表明,每位观察者之间以及三位观察者之间在 6 个月前后的一致性很高。观察者 1、观察者 2 和观察者 3 的 ICC 分别为 0.951、0.947 和 0.927,三位观察者第一次和第二次的 ICC 分别为 0.955 和 0.941。结论事实证明,ESPT 在评估护士罹患 MSD 的风险方面具有很高的可靠性,可以用于这一目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
90 years SOM then and now A better approach to mitigate the risk of airborne infections in workplaces. Bauxite mine and alumina refinery workers: mortality and cancer risk ECHO OEM virtual community of learning for primary care. Evaluation of job satisfaction and related factors in wood extraction workers in Gilan province
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1