Regulating Digital Era: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Perspectives on Media Entertainment

Reeta Sony, S. Chopra
{"title":"Regulating Digital Era: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Perspectives on Media Entertainment","authors":"Reeta Sony, S. Chopra","doi":"10.17323/2713-2749.2024.2.97.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid proliferation of digital media platforms has democratized content creation and distribution, enabling a vast spectrum of voices to be heard. It has brought about a significant shift in media entertainment landscapes worldwide, with India being a prominent case study due to its vast and diverse content consumption patterns. The massive content on the Internet has also raised concerns regarding misinformation, copyright infringement, and cultural sensitivity. Therefore, in the context of media entertainment, the regulation of the digital era presents a vast complex array of challenges for policymakers. Thereby, it analyzes the regulatory challenges and policy perspectives; addressing how India is navigating the complexities introduced by digital technologies. The study outlines India’s current regulatory framework including legislative measures. Apart from this, the paper contains exploration of challenges of balancing free speech with societal norms in a country characterized by its cultural pluralism. The authors of the article argue that rational regulation is able to help to prevent the spread of misinformation, protect national security, and ensure privacy. It can play a pivotal role in promoting national integration by fostering unity, preventing communal tensions, and ensuring equal representation. To achieve the objectives, the paper analyzes three case studies — Swami Ramdev v. Facebook, Inc.* (2019), the Tandav Controversy (2021), and the Tiktok ban for privacy and security concerns (2020). In the later section, the authors analyze and compare the regulatory framework of different states including India, the United States, European countries, Australia, and China. In the end, the paper summarizes the need for changes in the regulatory framework and also recommends policy measures that may be implemented to safeguard the consumers’ interest, preserve cultural values, and ensure the integrity of content.","PeriodicalId":410740,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues in the Digital Age","volume":"119 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues in the Digital Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2713-2749.2024.2.97.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of digital media platforms has democratized content creation and distribution, enabling a vast spectrum of voices to be heard. It has brought about a significant shift in media entertainment landscapes worldwide, with India being a prominent case study due to its vast and diverse content consumption patterns. The massive content on the Internet has also raised concerns regarding misinformation, copyright infringement, and cultural sensitivity. Therefore, in the context of media entertainment, the regulation of the digital era presents a vast complex array of challenges for policymakers. Thereby, it analyzes the regulatory challenges and policy perspectives; addressing how India is navigating the complexities introduced by digital technologies. The study outlines India’s current regulatory framework including legislative measures. Apart from this, the paper contains exploration of challenges of balancing free speech with societal norms in a country characterized by its cultural pluralism. The authors of the article argue that rational regulation is able to help to prevent the spread of misinformation, protect national security, and ensure privacy. It can play a pivotal role in promoting national integration by fostering unity, preventing communal tensions, and ensuring equal representation. To achieve the objectives, the paper analyzes three case studies — Swami Ramdev v. Facebook, Inc.* (2019), the Tandav Controversy (2021), and the Tiktok ban for privacy and security concerns (2020). In the later section, the authors analyze and compare the regulatory framework of different states including India, the United States, European countries, Australia, and China. In the end, the paper summarizes the need for changes in the regulatory framework and also recommends policy measures that may be implemented to safeguard the consumers’ interest, preserve cultural values, and ensure the integrity of content.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监管数字时代:媒体娱乐政策视角的比较分析
数字媒体平台的迅速普及实现了内容创作和传播的民主化,使各种声音都能被听到。它给全世界的媒体娱乐格局带来了重大变化,印度因其庞大而多样的内容消费模式而成为一个突出的案例研究对象。互联网上的大量内容也引发了人们对错误信息、版权侵权和文化敏感性的担忧。因此,在媒体娱乐方面,数字时代的监管给政策制定者带来了大量复杂的挑战。因此,本研究分析了监管挑战和政策视角;探讨了印度如何应对数字技术带来的复杂问题。研究报告概述了印度当前的监管框架,包括立法措施。除此之外,本文还探讨了在一个文化多元化的国家中如何平衡言论自由与社会规范之间的关系所面临的挑战。文章作者认为,合理的监管有助于防止错误信息的传播、保护国家安全和确保隐私。它可以通过促进团结、防止社区紧张关系和确保平等代表权,在促进民族融合方面发挥关键作用。为实现上述目标,本文分析了三个案例研究--斯瓦米-拉姆德夫诉 Facebook 公司*(2019 年)、坦达夫争议(2021 年)以及因隐私和安全问题而禁止 Tiktok(2020 年)。在后面的章节中,作者分析并比较了印度、美国、欧洲国家、澳大利亚和中国等不同国家的监管框架。最后,本文总结了改变监管框架的必要性,并提出了可实施的政策措施建议,以维护消费者利益、保护文化价值并确保内容的完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technologies Versus Justice: Challenges of AI Regulation in the Judicial System Digital Platforms in the Focus of National Law Progress in Natural Language Processing Technologies: Regulating Quality and Accessibility of Training Data Legal Horizons of the New Artificial Intelligence Paradigm Regulating Digital Era: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Perspectives on Media Entertainment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1