The French Telemedicine System: Challenges, Procedures and Difficulties

Guillaume Rousset
{"title":"The French Telemedicine System: Challenges, Procedures and Difficulties","authors":"Guillaume Rousset","doi":"10.17323/2713-2749.2024.2.80.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In France, telemedicine has been developing rapidly for several years, in response to economic, technical and legal challenges. The aim of the article is to present the broad outlines of the system that has been put in place, from a number of angles. The first deals with the problems to which telemedicine is proposed as a response. These problems are essentially what are known as “medical deserts”. Telemedicine is presented as a tool for compensating for the absence or shortage of healthcare professionals in a given area. This system would then promote reliable access to healthcare for the population. While this is a laudable objective, a more detailed analysis casts doubt on whether this result will be achieved. The second angle of this reflection concerns the conditions and procedures for implementing telemedicine. This involves looking at the players involved in order to determine what type of person can be mobilized, in terms of both the type of healthcare professional involved and the type of patient concerned. It is also a question of determining where a telemedicine procedure should be carried out, which shows the diversity of possibilities: where can the booths be set up and, more generally, where should the patient be on this occasion? The third and final angle of this contribution deals with the question of the risks that the practice of telemedicine may generate for patients over and above the benefits that can be imagined.","PeriodicalId":410740,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues in the Digital Age","volume":"114 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues in the Digital Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2713-2749.2024.2.80.96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In France, telemedicine has been developing rapidly for several years, in response to economic, technical and legal challenges. The aim of the article is to present the broad outlines of the system that has been put in place, from a number of angles. The first deals with the problems to which telemedicine is proposed as a response. These problems are essentially what are known as “medical deserts”. Telemedicine is presented as a tool for compensating for the absence or shortage of healthcare professionals in a given area. This system would then promote reliable access to healthcare for the population. While this is a laudable objective, a more detailed analysis casts doubt on whether this result will be achieved. The second angle of this reflection concerns the conditions and procedures for implementing telemedicine. This involves looking at the players involved in order to determine what type of person can be mobilized, in terms of both the type of healthcare professional involved and the type of patient concerned. It is also a question of determining where a telemedicine procedure should be carried out, which shows the diversity of possibilities: where can the booths be set up and, more generally, where should the patient be on this occasion? The third and final angle of this contribution deals with the question of the risks that the practice of telemedicine may generate for patients over and above the benefits that can be imagined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法国远程医疗系统:挑战、程序和困难
在法国,为应对经济、技术和法律方面的挑战,远程医疗几年来发展迅速。本文旨在从多个角度介绍已建立的系统的大致轮廓。首先是远程医疗所要应对的问题。这些问题基本上就是所谓的 "医疗荒漠"。远程医疗被认为是弥补特定地区医疗专业人员缺乏或短缺的一种工具。这样,该系统就能促进民众获得可靠的医疗服务。虽然这是一个值得称赞的目标,但更详细的分析使人对这一结果能否实现产生怀疑。思考的第二个角度涉及实施远程医疗的条件和程序。这涉及到对参与方的考察,以确定可以动员哪种类型的人,既包括参与的医疗专业人员类型,也包括相关病人的类型。这也是一个确定在何处进行远程医疗程序的问题,它显示了可能性的多样性:可以在何处设立展台,更广泛地说,病人应该在何处?这篇论文的第三个也是最后一个角度涉及远程医疗实践可能给病人带来的风险问题,这些风险超出了可以想象到的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technologies Versus Justice: Challenges of AI Regulation in the Judicial System Digital Platforms in the Focus of National Law Progress in Natural Language Processing Technologies: Regulating Quality and Accessibility of Training Data Legal Horizons of the New Artificial Intelligence Paradigm Regulating Digital Era: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Perspectives on Media Entertainment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1