Evaluating Hematological Inflammatory Markers as Predictors of Preeclampsia

Ş. Genç, Huseyin Erdal
{"title":"Evaluating Hematological Inflammatory Markers as Predictors of Preeclampsia","authors":"Ş. Genç, Huseyin Erdal","doi":"10.31083/j.ceog5107163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Preeclampsia, affecting 2–8% of pregnancies, is characterized by new-onset hypertension, proteinuria, and edema, stemming from placental dysfunction and subsequent inflammatory cascade activation. This study aimed to test the predictive ability of hematological indices in predicting preeclampsia. Therefore, predicting the diagnosis of preeclampsia earlier with higher accuracy could potentially preserve the lives of both the mother and the fetus, while also reducing the rates of complications. Methods : This retrospective study included two groups: patients with preeclampsia and a matched control group without additional medical conditions, both having undergone childbirth in the same gestational week. The primary difference between the groups was the preeclampsia diagnosis. Hematological parameters and inflammatory indices were compared for analysis. Results : Statistical significance was observed between derived neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SIRI) and pan-immune inflammation value (PIV) between groups. The dNLR and PIV showed predictive relevance for preeclampsia ( p < 0.05). However, their predictive performance was weak (under the curve (AUC) < 0.5). A composite index (CoI) combining these indices achieved a higher AUC of 0.62, indicating limited better predictive performance capability. Conclusions : These findings affirm the correlation between preeclampsia and increased inflammation. Inflammatory markers like the dNLR, SIRI, and PIV showed statistical significance but were not practically useful in clinical settings due to their low sensitivity and specificity. The results highlight the necessity of exploring a CoI, which combines these markers, to enhance predictive accuracy and clinical utility.","PeriodicalId":505527,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5107163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Preeclampsia, affecting 2–8% of pregnancies, is characterized by new-onset hypertension, proteinuria, and edema, stemming from placental dysfunction and subsequent inflammatory cascade activation. This study aimed to test the predictive ability of hematological indices in predicting preeclampsia. Therefore, predicting the diagnosis of preeclampsia earlier with higher accuracy could potentially preserve the lives of both the mother and the fetus, while also reducing the rates of complications. Methods : This retrospective study included two groups: patients with preeclampsia and a matched control group without additional medical conditions, both having undergone childbirth in the same gestational week. The primary difference between the groups was the preeclampsia diagnosis. Hematological parameters and inflammatory indices were compared for analysis. Results : Statistical significance was observed between derived neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SIRI) and pan-immune inflammation value (PIV) between groups. The dNLR and PIV showed predictive relevance for preeclampsia ( p < 0.05). However, their predictive performance was weak (under the curve (AUC) < 0.5). A composite index (CoI) combining these indices achieved a higher AUC of 0.62, indicating limited better predictive performance capability. Conclusions : These findings affirm the correlation between preeclampsia and increased inflammation. Inflammatory markers like the dNLR, SIRI, and PIV showed statistical significance but were not practically useful in clinical settings due to their low sensitivity and specificity. The results highlight the necessity of exploring a CoI, which combines these markers, to enhance predictive accuracy and clinical utility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估作为子痫前期预测指标的血液炎症标记物
背景:子痫前期占妊娠的 2-8%,其特点是新发高血压、蛋白尿和水肿,源于胎盘功能障碍和随后的炎症级联激活。本研究旨在测试血液学指标对子痫前期的预测能力。因此,如果能更早更准确地预测子痫前期的诊断,就有可能保护母亲和胎儿的生命,同时降低并发症的发生率。方法:这项回顾性研究包括两组:子痫前期患者和无其他疾病的匹配对照组,两组患者均在同一孕周分娩。两组患者的主要区别在于先兆子痫的诊断。分析比较了血液学参数和炎症指数。结果:观察发现,组间中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(dNLR)、全身免疫炎症指数(SIRI)和泛免疫炎症值(PIV)之间存在统计学意义。dNLR 和 PIV 对子痫前期有预测作用(P < 0.05)。然而,它们的预测性能较弱(曲线下(AUC)< 0.5)。结合这些指数的综合指数(CoI)的AUC更高,达到0.62,表明其预测能力有限。结论 :这些研究结果证实了子痫前期与炎症增加之间的相关性。炎症标志物如 dNLR、SIRI 和 PIV 具有统计学意义,但由于其敏感性和特异性较低,在临床上并不实用。研究结果突出表明,有必要探索一种结合这些标记物的 CoI,以提高预测准确性和临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix Risk Factors for Endometrial Cancer in the World: A Narrative Review of the Recent Literature Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Menstruation in Vaccinated Women: A Monocentric Retrospective Study Comparative Study of the Effects of Sublingual Trinitroglycerin and Sublingual Misoprostol on Cervical Preparation before Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial Effect of Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation Combined with Abdominal Acupoint Massage on Postoperative Gastrointestinal Function Recovery after Cesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1