Decentralization, local information, and effort substitution: Evidence from a subnational decentralization reform in China

IF 3.1 3区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1111/gove.12884
Sicheng Chen, Lingran Yuan, Weijie Wang, Binlei Gong
{"title":"Decentralization, local information, and effort substitution: Evidence from a subnational decentralization reform in China","authors":"Sicheng Chen,&nbsp;Lingran Yuan,&nbsp;Weijie Wang,&nbsp;Binlei Gong","doi":"10.1111/gove.12884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines whether and how information asymmetry affects local governments' gaming behaviors in a decentralization reform. We contend that adequate access to local information by the principal is a prerequisite for mitigating effort substitution among agents. We examine the hypothesis based on a decentralization reform in China—the Integration of Agriculture-related Fiscal Transfer reform. We use the distance between pilot villages and the provincial capital as the measurement of local information. Employing a difference-in-differences design to scrutinize a unique dataset comprising 85,628 observations spanning 9199 villages from 2011 to 2020, we find that subnational decentralization with information asymmetry leads to increased effort substitution by local governments. Further analysis reveals that more abundant local information can alleviate the extent of effort substitution in reformed villages. Overall, this research highlights the importance of considering local information when designing policies to mitigate performance gaming in public goods provision and support effective subnational decentralization.</p>","PeriodicalId":48056,"journal":{"name":"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions","volume":"38 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gove.12884","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines whether and how information asymmetry affects local governments' gaming behaviors in a decentralization reform. We contend that adequate access to local information by the principal is a prerequisite for mitigating effort substitution among agents. We examine the hypothesis based on a decentralization reform in China—the Integration of Agriculture-related Fiscal Transfer reform. We use the distance between pilot villages and the provincial capital as the measurement of local information. Employing a difference-in-differences design to scrutinize a unique dataset comprising 85,628 observations spanning 9199 villages from 2011 to 2020, we find that subnational decentralization with information asymmetry leads to increased effort substitution by local governments. Further analysis reveals that more abundant local information can alleviate the extent of effort substitution in reformed villages. Overall, this research highlights the importance of considering local information when designing policies to mitigate performance gaming in public goods provision and support effective subnational decentralization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权力下放、地方信息和努力替代:中国国家以下各级权力下放改革的证据
本研究探讨了信息不对称是否以及如何影响地方政府在权力下放改革中的博弈行为。我们认为,委托人充分获取地方信息是减轻代理人之间努力替代的先决条件。我们以中国的一项分权改革--涉农财政转移支付一体化改革--为基础,对这一假设进行了研究。我们使用试点村与省会之间的距离作为当地信息的衡量标准。我们采用差分法设计了一个独特的数据集,该数据集由 2011 年至 2020 年间 9199 个村庄的 85628 个观测值组成。进一步的分析表明,更丰富的地方信息可以减轻改革后村庄的努力替代程度。总之,这项研究强调了在制定政策时考虑地方信息的重要性,以减少公共产品提供过程中的绩效博弈,支持有效的国家以下各级权力下放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.30%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Governance provides a forum for the theoretical and practical discussion of executive politics, public policy, administration, and the organization of the state. Published in association with International Political Science Association''s Research Committee on the Structure & Organization of Government (SOG), it emphasizes peer-reviewed articles that take an international or comparative approach to public policy and administration. All papers, regardless of empirical focus, should have wider theoretical, comparative, or practical significance.
期刊最新文献
Blame Avoidance and Corruption: How Politicians' Denials Shape Citizen Perceptions and Political Accountability Situated Attention in Political Decision-Making: A Theoretical Framework and Experimental Test of Politicians' Prioritization of Societal Challenges Across Policy Domains Populist Governance Strategies: How Growth Coalition Tensions Affect Populist Policymaking In Covid’s Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us By Stephen Macedo and Frances Lee, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2025. 373 pp. $20.97 (ebook) The Unexpected Actor? Civil-Military Relations and Regulatory Agency Control in Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1