Recipe for Fatigue: Sleep, work patterns, and well-being of galley workers on Surface Ships of the United States Navy

N. Shattuck, P. Matsangas
{"title":"Recipe for Fatigue: Sleep, work patterns, and well-being of galley workers on Surface Ships of the United States Navy","authors":"N. Shattuck, P. Matsangas","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The purpose of the study was to compare the fatigue levels, work/rest patterns, health-related behaviors, and well-being of galley workers with other sailors on United States Navy ships while underway.\n \n \n \n Analysis was based on a retrospective comparison of data from three fit-for-duty groups of sailors: 67 galley workers, 192 non-watchstanders, and 466 watchstanders. Participants completed questionnaires (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS], Insomnia Severity Index [ISI], Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI], Profile of Mood States [POMS]) and activity logs, and wore actigraphs.\n \n \n \n Galley workers slept MD=6.57 (IQR=1.42) hours/day and worked MD=12.8 (IQR=2.42) hours/day. Approximately 84% of the galley workers were classified as poor sleepers, ~57% reported having excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), and ~38% reported elevated insomnia symptoms. Compared to non-watchstanders, galley workers had worse scores on POMS (total mood disturbance, tension-anxiety, depression, anger-hostility, fatigue, confusion-bewilderment), ESS, ISI, and PSQI. Compared to non-watchstanders, galley workers had a higher risk for symptoms of EDS (75%), symptoms of clinically relevant insomnia (126%), and for being classified as poor sleepers (27%). Galley workers slept less and worked on average two hours/day more than non-watchstanders. Compared to watchstanders, galley workers had worse ESS, ISI, and anger-hostility scores. More watchstanders napped compared to galley workers.\n \n \n \n Although they are considered day workers, the sleep patterns, fatigue levels, and mood of galley workers are comparable to, or worse than, watchstanders or other non-watchstanders. To ameliorate the effects of long work hours on sailor well-being, ship leadership should consider adopting strategies to improve galley workers’ well-being.\n","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the fatigue levels, work/rest patterns, health-related behaviors, and well-being of galley workers with other sailors on United States Navy ships while underway. Analysis was based on a retrospective comparison of data from three fit-for-duty groups of sailors: 67 galley workers, 192 non-watchstanders, and 466 watchstanders. Participants completed questionnaires (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS], Insomnia Severity Index [ISI], Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI], Profile of Mood States [POMS]) and activity logs, and wore actigraphs. Galley workers slept MD=6.57 (IQR=1.42) hours/day and worked MD=12.8 (IQR=2.42) hours/day. Approximately 84% of the galley workers were classified as poor sleepers, ~57% reported having excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), and ~38% reported elevated insomnia symptoms. Compared to non-watchstanders, galley workers had worse scores on POMS (total mood disturbance, tension-anxiety, depression, anger-hostility, fatigue, confusion-bewilderment), ESS, ISI, and PSQI. Compared to non-watchstanders, galley workers had a higher risk for symptoms of EDS (75%), symptoms of clinically relevant insomnia (126%), and for being classified as poor sleepers (27%). Galley workers slept less and worked on average two hours/day more than non-watchstanders. Compared to watchstanders, galley workers had worse ESS, ISI, and anger-hostility scores. More watchstanders napped compared to galley workers. Although they are considered day workers, the sleep patterns, fatigue levels, and mood of galley workers are comparable to, or worse than, watchstanders or other non-watchstanders. To ameliorate the effects of long work hours on sailor well-being, ship leadership should consider adopting strategies to improve galley workers’ well-being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疲劳食谱:美国海军水面舰艇厨房工人的睡眠、工作模式和福祉
这项研究的目的是比较美国海军舰艇上厨房工人与其他水手在航行中的疲劳程度、工作/休息模式、健康相关行为和幸福感。 分析基于对三组适合工作的水手数据的回顾性比较:67 名厨房工人、192 名非值班人员和 466 名值班人员。参与者填写了调查问卷(埃普沃斯嗜睡量表[ESS]、失眠严重程度指数[ISI]、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数[PSQI]、情绪状态档案[POMS])和活动日志,并佩戴了行动记录仪。 厨房工人的睡眠时间 MD=6.57 (IQR=1.42) 小时/天,工作时间 MD=12.8 (IQR=2.42) 小时/天。约 84% 的厨房工人被归类为睡眠质量差,约 57% 的工人报告说白天过度嗜睡 (EDS),约 38% 的工人报告说失眠症状加重。与非旁观者相比,厨房工人在 POMS(总情绪障碍、紧张-焦虑、抑郁、愤怒-敌意、疲劳、困惑-迷茫)、ESS、ISI 和 PSQI 方面的得分较低。与非值班人员相比,厨房工人出现 EDS 症状(75%)、临床相关失眠症状(126%)和睡眠质量差(27%)的风险较高。与非值班人员相比,厨房工人的睡眠时间更短,平均每天工作时间多两个小时。与旁观者相比,厨房工人的ESS、ISI和愤怒-敌意得分更低。与厨房工人相比,看守工人打盹的时间更多。 虽然他们被认为是日班工人,但厨房工人的睡眠模式、疲劳程度和情绪与值班人员或其他非值班人员相当,甚至更差。为了减轻长时间工作对水手身心健康的影响,舰艇领导层应考虑采取一些策略来改善厨房工人的身心健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Central Role of Sulcal Width in the Associations of Sleep Duration and Depression with Cognition in Mid to Late Life Clinical and Financial Significance of Insomnia within a Large Payor-Provider Health System Impact of Real-World Implementation of Evidence-Based Insomnia Treatment within a Large Payor-Provider Health System: Initial Provider and Patient-Level Outcomes Poor Sleep and Inflammatory Gene Expression Among Care Partners of Persons Living with Dementia: A Pilot Trial of a Behavioral Sleep Intervention Sex-Specific Associations Between Habitual Snoring and Cancer Prevalence: Insights from a U.S. Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1