Developing an Audit Framework for Local Flood Risk Management Strategies: Is Increasing Surface Water Flood Risk in England Being Adequately Managed?

Climate Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.3390/cli12070106
Andrew Russell, Adam James McCue, Aakash Dipak Patel
{"title":"Developing an Audit Framework for Local Flood Risk Management Strategies: Is Increasing Surface Water Flood Risk in England Being Adequately Managed?","authors":"Andrew Russell, Adam James McCue, Aakash Dipak Patel","doi":"10.3390/cli12070106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Here, we investigate whether England’s 152 local flood risk management strategies (LFRMSs) satisfy minimal legislative criteria and address the growing surface water flood (SWF) risk caused by climate change. A systematic audit was used to assess the alignment of the LFRMSs with national climate change legislation and other relevant national strategies. An objective method to identify inclusion of a range of factors that good strategies should include was applied. LFRMSs are mostly meeting their minimum statutory requirements. However, there is a widespread issue across most LFRMSs regarding inadequate consideration of increasing SWF risk from climate changes, which highlights the need for enhanced LFRMSs by improved planning and climate change adaptation plans. There is some evidence of good practice within the LFRMS portfolio, which is discussed in the context of the ongoing LFRMS update process. Beyond England, there are implications for developing FRM processes at a local level that can be objectively assessed against national requirements. Communities in England face inadequately managed SWF risk in the future because of the range in plan quality across the LFRMSs. This research contributes to the ongoing examination of the full suite of 152 LFRMSs and, therefore, builds towards a complete assessment of the SWF management approach in England. This will help inform local climate change adaptation strategies that cater to the escalating threat of SWF due to climate change.","PeriodicalId":504716,"journal":{"name":"Climate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12070106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Here, we investigate whether England’s 152 local flood risk management strategies (LFRMSs) satisfy minimal legislative criteria and address the growing surface water flood (SWF) risk caused by climate change. A systematic audit was used to assess the alignment of the LFRMSs with national climate change legislation and other relevant national strategies. An objective method to identify inclusion of a range of factors that good strategies should include was applied. LFRMSs are mostly meeting their minimum statutory requirements. However, there is a widespread issue across most LFRMSs regarding inadequate consideration of increasing SWF risk from climate changes, which highlights the need for enhanced LFRMSs by improved planning and climate change adaptation plans. There is some evidence of good practice within the LFRMS portfolio, which is discussed in the context of the ongoing LFRMS update process. Beyond England, there are implications for developing FRM processes at a local level that can be objectively assessed against national requirements. Communities in England face inadequately managed SWF risk in the future because of the range in plan quality across the LFRMSs. This research contributes to the ongoing examination of the full suite of 152 LFRMSs and, therefore, builds towards a complete assessment of the SWF management approach in England. This will help inform local climate change adaptation strategies that cater to the escalating threat of SWF due to climate change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为地方洪水风险管理战略制定审计框架:英格兰不断增加的地表水洪水风险是否得到了充分管理?
在此,我们调查了英格兰的 152 个地方洪水风险管理战略(LFRMS)是否符合最低立法标准,是否能够应对气候变化导致的日益增长的地表水洪水(SWF)风险。我们采用了系统审计的方法来评估地方洪水风险管理战略与国家气候变化立法和其他相关国家战略的一致性。我们采用了一种客观的方法,以确定良好战略应包含的一系列因素。地方林业管理制度大多符合最低法定要求。然而,大多数《湖泊保护管理办法》普遍存在一个问题,即对气候变化导致的世界自然基金会增加的风险考虑不足,这突出表明需要通过改进规划和气候变化适应计划来加强《湖泊保护管理办法》。有证据表明,《低偿付能力管理计划》中存在一些良好做法,我们将在当前的《低偿付能力管理计划》更新过程中对此进行讨论。在英格兰之外,在地方层面制定可根据国家要求进行客观评估的森林资源恢复管理程序也有其意义。由于各地方森林资源管理制度的规划质量参差不齐,英格兰社区未来将面临管理不足的西南部森林风险。这项研究有助于对全部 152 项地方森林资源管理计划进行持续审查,从而对英格兰的西南部森林管理方法进行全面评估。这将有助于为地方气候变化适应战略提供信息,以应对因气候变化而不断升级的 SWF 威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Adaptation Strategies to Mitigate Climate Threats to Transportation Infrastructure in Nigeria: Lagos City, as a Case Study Conducting a Tailored and Localised Marine Heat Wave Risk Assessment for Vanuatu Fisheries Combining E-Scores with Scenario Analysis to Evaluate the Impact of Transition Risk on Corporate Client Performance Developing an Audit Framework for Local Flood Risk Management Strategies: Is Increasing Surface Water Flood Risk in England Being Adequately Managed? Unraveling the Intricate Links between the Dwindling Aral Sea and Climate Variability during 2002–2017
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1