A Retrospective Audit with Subsequent Cost and Environmental Analysis of a Denosumab Self Injection Programme

IF 3.4 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM JBMR Plus Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae092
Jack Boylan, Jane Turton, Zoe Hicks, Julia Cottam, Michael Stone
{"title":"A Retrospective Audit with Subsequent Cost and Environmental Analysis of a Denosumab Self Injection Programme","authors":"Jack Boylan, Jane Turton, Zoe Hicks, Julia Cottam, Michael Stone","doi":"10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Metabolic Bone Health Department, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, serves a local population of approximately 445 000 people. A retrospective audit of attendance data regarding the Denosumab treatment clinic (the traditional treatment pathway) and the Denosumab Self Injection Programme (SIP) was conducted to determine whether the Self Injection Programme is both cost effective and environmentally beneficial, compared to the traditional treatment pathway. Cost analysis was then conducted by the Finance Department.\n The audit was conducted over 3 years following the implementation of the service development; 233 patients had enrolled in the program at the time of the audit and 69 had completed 3 years of self- injected treatment.\n A control group of 497 patients were identified by the service. This group remained on the historical pathway and had consistent attendance activity over the three-year period from 2017 to 2019. Pre and post period activity of all patients on the program was compared, together with the activity for the independent control group.\n The SIP resulted in a reduction in clinical contacts, with financial analysis showing a total opportunity cost saving per patient of £420 per annum. There were obvious benefits to the patient of a reduced number of visits to a clinical site, which also resulted in an estimated carbon footprint reduction of 59 KG CO2 per patient per annum.\n The cost analysis is based on our organisation’s 2022 charges. The SIP demonstrates that through focusing on care “closer to home”, it is possible to maximise resources, improve the patient experience through reduced travel and reduce the environmental impact of healthcare.","PeriodicalId":14611,"journal":{"name":"JBMR Plus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBMR Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Metabolic Bone Health Department, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, serves a local population of approximately 445 000 people. A retrospective audit of attendance data regarding the Denosumab treatment clinic (the traditional treatment pathway) and the Denosumab Self Injection Programme (SIP) was conducted to determine whether the Self Injection Programme is both cost effective and environmentally beneficial, compared to the traditional treatment pathway. Cost analysis was then conducted by the Finance Department. The audit was conducted over 3 years following the implementation of the service development; 233 patients had enrolled in the program at the time of the audit and 69 had completed 3 years of self- injected treatment. A control group of 497 patients were identified by the service. This group remained on the historical pathway and had consistent attendance activity over the three-year period from 2017 to 2019. Pre and post period activity of all patients on the program was compared, together with the activity for the independent control group. The SIP resulted in a reduction in clinical contacts, with financial analysis showing a total opportunity cost saving per patient of £420 per annum. There were obvious benefits to the patient of a reduced number of visits to a clinical site, which also resulted in an estimated carbon footprint reduction of 59 KG CO2 per patient per annum. The cost analysis is based on our organisation’s 2022 charges. The SIP demonstrates that through focusing on care “closer to home”, it is possible to maximise resources, improve the patient experience through reduced travel and reduce the environmental impact of healthcare.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对地诺单抗自我注射计划的回顾性审计及后续成本和环境分析
卡迪夫和维尔大学卫生委员会代谢骨健康部为当地约 445 000 人提供服务。该部门对地诺单抗治疗诊所(传统治疗途径)和地诺单抗自我注射计划(SIP)的就诊数据进行了回顾性审计,以确定与传统治疗途径相比,自我注射计划是否具有成本效益和环境效益。财务部随后进行了成本分析。审计工作在服务发展实施 3 年后进行;审计时,233 名患者已加入该计划,69 名患者已完成 3 年的自我注射治疗。该服务确定了一个由 497 名患者组成的对照组。这组患者仍沿用历史路径,并在 2017 年至 2019 年的三年期间有持续的就诊活动。我们将所有参加该计划的患者的前后活动与独立对照组的活动进行了比较。SIP 项目减少了临床接触,财务分析显示,每位患者每年可节省 420 英镑的机会成本。对患者而言,减少到临床就诊次数的好处显而易见,估计每位患者每年可减少 59 千克二氧化碳的碳足迹。成本分析以本组织 2022 年的收费为基础。SIP 证明,通过将重点放在 "离家更近 "的医疗服务上,可以最大限度地利用资源,通过减少旅行改善患者体验,并减少医疗服务对环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JBMR Plus
JBMR Plus Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
103
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
High-fiber diet reduces bone formation but does not affect bone microarchitecture in type 2 diabetes individuals. Longitudinal Course of Circulating miRNAs in a Patient with Hypophosphatasia and Asfotase alfa Treatment: a Case Report In Vivo Glycation – Interplay between Oxidant and Carbonyl Stress in Bone ENPP1 enzyme replacement therapy improves ectopic calcification but does not rescue skeletal phenotype in a mouse model for craniometaphyseal dysplasia. Girk3 deletion increases osteoblast maturation and bone mass accrual in adult male mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1