Patient Satisfaction in Rural Versus Non‐Rural US Hospitals

Sharon Vu, Logan Reese, Neha Patel, Man Hung
{"title":"Patient Satisfaction in Rural Versus Non‐Rural US Hospitals","authors":"Sharon Vu, Logan Reese, Neha Patel, Man Hung","doi":"10.1002/puh2.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing patient satisfaction is an effective way to provide an evaluation of the quality of healthcare services. As a result, the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) Patient Survey was established as the first standardized national survey to publicly report patient ratings on hospital care. There remains a lack of research that examines rural–urban distinctions in patient satisfaction. The objective of this study was to investigate if there is a difference in hospital determinants of patient satisfaction among hospitals based on rural status.The study utilized two public datasets containing HCAHPS survey results from 4714 US hospitals and from eligible cancer hospitals that participate in the Prospective Payment System‐Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting. The data were collected from July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 and published by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Rural status of each hospital was determined by matching zip codes with data provided by the Health Resources & Services Administration.A total of 3248 hospitals were included in the analysis, with approximately 51.14% located in rural areas. There was a significant difference across every hospital determinant when comparing rural and non‐rural status. Rural hospitals had a higher score for every hospital determinant (Cleanliness, Nurse communication, Doctor communication, Staff responsiveness, Communication about medicines, Discharge information, Care transition, Overall hospital rating, Quietness, and Willingness to recommend the hospital), indicating better performance.Rural hospitals demonstrated better HCAHPS performance across every hospital determinant in comparison to urban hospitals, suggesting possible recent improvements. Future research is necessary to investigate this trend and its consistency, which can inform targeted interventions to better address the healthcare needs of diverse populations in the United States.","PeriodicalId":506750,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Challenges","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing patient satisfaction is an effective way to provide an evaluation of the quality of healthcare services. As a result, the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) Patient Survey was established as the first standardized national survey to publicly report patient ratings on hospital care. There remains a lack of research that examines rural–urban distinctions in patient satisfaction. The objective of this study was to investigate if there is a difference in hospital determinants of patient satisfaction among hospitals based on rural status.The study utilized two public datasets containing HCAHPS survey results from 4714 US hospitals and from eligible cancer hospitals that participate in the Prospective Payment System‐Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting. The data were collected from July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 and published by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Rural status of each hospital was determined by matching zip codes with data provided by the Health Resources & Services Administration.A total of 3248 hospitals were included in the analysis, with approximately 51.14% located in rural areas. There was a significant difference across every hospital determinant when comparing rural and non‐rural status. Rural hospitals had a higher score for every hospital determinant (Cleanliness, Nurse communication, Doctor communication, Staff responsiveness, Communication about medicines, Discharge information, Care transition, Overall hospital rating, Quietness, and Willingness to recommend the hospital), indicating better performance.Rural hospitals demonstrated better HCAHPS performance across every hospital determinant in comparison to urban hospitals, suggesting possible recent improvements. Future research is necessary to investigate this trend and its consistency, which can inform targeted interventions to better address the healthcare needs of diverse populations in the United States.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国农村医院与非农村医院患者满意度对比
评估患者满意度是评价医疗服务质量的有效方法。因此,"医院医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估"(HCAHPS)患者调查被确立为首个公开报告患者对医院护理评分的全国性标准化调查。目前仍缺乏对城乡患者满意度差异的研究。本研究利用了两个公共数据集,其中包含来自 4714 家美国医院的 HCAHPS 调查结果,以及来自参与 "前瞻性付费系统-豁免癌症医院质量报告 "的合格癌症医院的调查结果。数据收集时间为 2021 年 7 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日,由美国医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心发布。通过将邮政编码与卫生资源与服务管理局(Health Resources & Services Administration)提供的数据进行匹配,确定了每家医院的农村地区地位。共有 3248 家医院被纳入分析范围,其中约 51.14% 位于农村地区。农村医院与非农村医院在每项医院决定因素上都存在明显差异。与城市医院相比,农村医院在 HCAHPS 各项指标上的表现都更好,这表明农村医院最近可能有所改善。未来的研究有必要对这一趋势及其一致性进行调查,从而为有针对性的干预措施提供信息,以更好地满足美国不同人群的医疗保健需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring School Staff's Perceptions About Implementing Saliva‐Based Testing Workplace‐Based Education Interventions for Managing Metabolic Syndrome in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Realist Review US Farmworkers’ Barriers to Preventing Heat‐Related Illness: An Integrative Review Public Health Challenges and Responses to the Growing Ageing Populations Patient Satisfaction in Rural Versus Non‐Rural US Hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1