Practices Used in Health and Social Services for the Management of Mistreatment Situations towards Adults in a Context of Gender and Sexual Diversity: A Scoping Review

Mélanie Couture, Julien Gauthier-Mongeon, Pearce Simamonika, Rosalie Bernard, Kevin St-Martin, Rosalie Lacasse, S. Israel
{"title":"Practices Used in Health and Social Services for the Management of Mistreatment Situations towards Adults in a Context of Gender and Sexual Diversity: A Scoping Review","authors":"Mélanie Couture, Julien Gauthier-Mongeon, Pearce Simamonika, Rosalie Bernard, Kevin St-Martin, Rosalie Lacasse, S. Israel","doi":"10.21926/obm.geriatr.2403282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research indicates that adults in the context of gender and sexual diversity (GSD) experienced more violence and discrimination than the rest of the population. GSD refers to all the diversities of sexual characteristics, sexual orientations and gender identity of a person or a group. To encourage the use of evidence-based interventions in health and social services, it is important to extrapolate from the scientific literature how mistreatment situations are managed in this context. A scoping review was conducted using the approach of the Johanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. In total, 8 databases were searched for relevant studies published in English and in French. Screening according to inclusion criteria (titles, abstracts, and full texts) and data extraction were performed independently by two team members. Twelve studies were included in this scoping review and covered only three types of mistreatments: intimate partner violence, discrimination, and sexual assaults. Findings suggest a need for tools to better identify mistreatment situations in the context of GSD and additional studies to highlight effective interventions using adequate methodology. None of the studies reported data specifically about older adults or regarding key care events related to the management of mistreatment situations (reporting, needs assessment or investigation). Implications include addressing gaps in research and better educating care providers in health and social services in matters related to GSD, to ensure that they have a better understanding of the needs and realities of this population.","PeriodicalId":74332,"journal":{"name":"OBM geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OBM geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.geriatr.2403282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research indicates that adults in the context of gender and sexual diversity (GSD) experienced more violence and discrimination than the rest of the population. GSD refers to all the diversities of sexual characteristics, sexual orientations and gender identity of a person or a group. To encourage the use of evidence-based interventions in health and social services, it is important to extrapolate from the scientific literature how mistreatment situations are managed in this context. A scoping review was conducted using the approach of the Johanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. In total, 8 databases were searched for relevant studies published in English and in French. Screening according to inclusion criteria (titles, abstracts, and full texts) and data extraction were performed independently by two team members. Twelve studies were included in this scoping review and covered only three types of mistreatments: intimate partner violence, discrimination, and sexual assaults. Findings suggest a need for tools to better identify mistreatment situations in the context of GSD and additional studies to highlight effective interventions using adequate methodology. None of the studies reported data specifically about older adults or regarding key care events related to the management of mistreatment situations (reporting, needs assessment or investigation). Implications include addressing gaps in research and better educating care providers in health and social services in matters related to GSD, to ensure that they have a better understanding of the needs and realities of this population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在性别和性取向多样性的背景下,卫生和社会服务机构在处理虐待成年人情况时采用的做法:范围审查
研究表明,性别和性取向多样性(GSD)背景下的成年人比其他人遭受更多的暴力和歧视。GSD 是指一个人或一个群体在性特征、性取向和性别认同方面的所有多样性。为了鼓励在卫生和社会服务中使用循证干预措施,必须从科学文献中推断在这种情况下如何处理虐待情况。我们采用约翰娜-布里格斯研究所(Johanna Briggs Institute)的方法和《系统性综述和元分析协议扩展的首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews)指南进行了范围界定综述。共检索了 8 个数据库中以英语和法语发表的相关研究。根据纳入标准(标题、摘要和全文)进行的筛选和数据提取由两名团队成员独立完成。本次范围界定审查共纳入了 12 项研究,仅涉及三种虐待类型:亲密伴侣暴力、歧视和性侵犯。研究结果表明,我们需要一些工具来更好地识别 GSD 中的虐待情况,并需要更多的研究来强调使用适当方法的有效干预措施。没有一项研究专门报告了有关老年人或与虐待情况管理(报告、需求评估或调查)相关的关键护理事件的数据。研究的意义包括弥补研究方面的不足,更好地教育卫生和社会服务部门的护理人员与 GSD 相关的问题,以确保他们更好地了解这一群体的需求和现实情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Practices Used in Health and Social Services for the Management of Mistreatment Situations towards Adults in a Context of Gender and Sexual Diversity: A Scoping Review Integrating Palliative Medicine into Medical Education: Creating a More Compassionate Generation of Physicians Exploration of Dementia Help Seeking Behaviours Amongst UK South Asian Communities: A Systematic Review Impact of Sex and Gender Differences on Heart Failure, Especially in Elderly Patients Mental Health among the Elderly in Nepal: Special Emphasis on Depression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1