Exploring the anatomical relationship between the recurrent laryngeal nerve and the inferior thyroid artery: insights from cadaveric dissections

Pooja Dadwani, Ila Suttarwala, Jaikumar B Contractor
{"title":"Exploring the anatomical relationship between the recurrent laryngeal nerve and the inferior thyroid artery: insights from cadaveric dissections","authors":"Pooja Dadwani, Ila Suttarwala, Jaikumar B Contractor","doi":"10.18231/j.ijcap.2024.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Injury to Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve (RLN) is the most common complication of surgical interventions for thyroid gland disorders. This makes a thorough anatomical knowledge of RLN with variations in its branching pattern and relationship with Inferior Thyroid Artery (ITA) of vital importance for surgeons. The current study was aimed to establish the relationship of RLN with Inferior Thyroid Artery (ITA) as well as its implications on thyroid surgeries. We studied the 73 RLN during routine dissection and autopsy examinations through a lateral approach and observations were tabulated using descriptive statistics and relational statistics, Chi-square test, for analysing significance. The results showed statistically significant differences in RLN branching patterns as well as in its positions relative to ITA between the right and left RLN. Extra-laryngeal terminal bifurcations were the most common finding and posterior positioning of RLN with respect to ITA was predominant. More so, bifurcations occurred more frequently on the right side (75.67%) than on the left side (30.55%) (P < 0.05). The nerve was observed posterior to the ITA in 78.08%, anterior in 24.65% and in-between in 5.47% specimens. The potential consequences of such RLN variations on surgical outcomes emphasize the risk of iatrogenic injuries and associated symptoms. We also noted discrepancies in findings compared to a previous few studies, but these may be attributed to the embryological and racial differences. The study underscores the importance of understanding RLN anatomy for safe thyroid surgeries and warrant further research to elucidate RLN variations and their impact on surgical procedures contributing valuable insights into RLN anatomy to optimize surgical outcomes and reduce complications in thyroid surgeries.","PeriodicalId":91698,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of clinical anatomy and physiology","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of clinical anatomy and physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcap.2024.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Injury to Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve (RLN) is the most common complication of surgical interventions for thyroid gland disorders. This makes a thorough anatomical knowledge of RLN with variations in its branching pattern and relationship with Inferior Thyroid Artery (ITA) of vital importance for surgeons. The current study was aimed to establish the relationship of RLN with Inferior Thyroid Artery (ITA) as well as its implications on thyroid surgeries. We studied the 73 RLN during routine dissection and autopsy examinations through a lateral approach and observations were tabulated using descriptive statistics and relational statistics, Chi-square test, for analysing significance. The results showed statistically significant differences in RLN branching patterns as well as in its positions relative to ITA between the right and left RLN. Extra-laryngeal terminal bifurcations were the most common finding and posterior positioning of RLN with respect to ITA was predominant. More so, bifurcations occurred more frequently on the right side (75.67%) than on the left side (30.55%) (P < 0.05). The nerve was observed posterior to the ITA in 78.08%, anterior in 24.65% and in-between in 5.47% specimens. The potential consequences of such RLN variations on surgical outcomes emphasize the risk of iatrogenic injuries and associated symptoms. We also noted discrepancies in findings compared to a previous few studies, but these may be attributed to the embryological and racial differences. The study underscores the importance of understanding RLN anatomy for safe thyroid surgeries and warrant further research to elucidate RLN variations and their impact on surgical procedures contributing valuable insights into RLN anatomy to optimize surgical outcomes and reduce complications in thyroid surgeries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索喉返神经与甲状腺下动脉之间的解剖关系:尸体解剖的启示
喉返神经(RLN)损伤是甲状腺疾病手术治疗中最常见的并发症。因此,全面了解喉返神经的解剖结构、其分支模式的变化以及与甲状腺下动脉(ITA)的关系对外科医生来说至关重要。本研究旨在确定 RLN 与甲状腺下动脉 (ITA) 的关系及其对甲状腺手术的影响。我们在常规解剖和尸体解剖检查中通过侧方入路对 73 例 RLN 进行了研究,并使用描述性统计和关系统计、Chi-square 检验将观察结果制成表格,以分析其显著性。结果显示,左右RLN的分支模式及其相对于ITA的位置在统计学上存在显著差异。喉外末端分叉是最常见的发现,RLN相对于ITA的位置以后方为主。此外,分叉发生在右侧(75.67%)的频率高于左侧(30.55%)(P < 0.05)。78.08%的标本观察到神经位于ITA后方,24.65%位于前方,5.47%位于两者之间。这种 RLN 变异对手术结果的潜在影响强调了先天性损伤和相关症状的风险。我们还注意到研究结果与之前的几项研究存在差异,但这可能是由于胚胎学和种族差异造成的。这项研究强调了了解RLN解剖结构对于甲状腺手术安全的重要性,因此有必要开展进一步研究,以阐明RLN变异及其对手术过程的影响,从而为优化手术效果和减少甲状腺手术并发症提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unusual variations in Gantzer muscle and neurovascular structures of forearm Cadaveric and ultrasonographic morphometry of cervicothoracic ganglion (Stellate ganglion) Bilateral kinking of extracranial part of internal carotid artery with coiling and tortuosity of external carotid artery To assess the effectiveness of intravenous metronidazole as an analgesic in post hemorrhoidectomy patients Ethical considerations of artificial intelligence (AI) in teaching and learning anatomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1