Nursing explanation skills in education and practice: Development skills and influence on incident occurrence

M. Fujimoto, Mika Shimamura, F. Yuki
{"title":"Nursing explanation skills in education and practice: Development skills and influence on incident occurrence","authors":"M. Fujimoto, Mika Shimamura, F. Yuki","doi":"10.5430/jnep.v14n11p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inaccurate explanations to patients, their families, and other healthcare professionals can adversely affect the quality of healthcare and patient safety. Despite the significance of good explanatory skills in nursing education and practice, supporting empirical data are limited. This study aimed to develop a psychological scale and investigate the impact of explanatory skills on patient safety by statistically testing the validity of hypothetical models derived from previous studies. In the preliminary investigation, 87 items were obtained from 109 experienced nurses. Study 1 involved an online explanatory skills survey with a sample of 1,000 nursing professionals. Study 2 comprised a field survey of 159 nursing staff working in a comprehensive hospital. Nine sub-skills, including seven common sub-skills and one specific sub-skill for each patient/family and staff, were identified and categorized under “compassion” and “shared mental model.” Clinical ladder progression was associated with both compassion and a shared mental model. Furthermore, compassion was identified as a factor that increased the probability of various incidents through interactional failures. Contrastingly, the shared mental model enhanced the probability of severe incidents due to judgmental and minor incidents from conceptual failures. This study developed a psychological scale to measure nursing explanation skills in communicating with patients, their families, and other medical staff and elucidated their impact on incident occurrence through miscommunication. Finally, the importance of accountability skills in nursing education and practice was discussed.","PeriodicalId":73866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing education and practice","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing education and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v14n11p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inaccurate explanations to patients, their families, and other healthcare professionals can adversely affect the quality of healthcare and patient safety. Despite the significance of good explanatory skills in nursing education and practice, supporting empirical data are limited. This study aimed to develop a psychological scale and investigate the impact of explanatory skills on patient safety by statistically testing the validity of hypothetical models derived from previous studies. In the preliminary investigation, 87 items were obtained from 109 experienced nurses. Study 1 involved an online explanatory skills survey with a sample of 1,000 nursing professionals. Study 2 comprised a field survey of 159 nursing staff working in a comprehensive hospital. Nine sub-skills, including seven common sub-skills and one specific sub-skill for each patient/family and staff, were identified and categorized under “compassion” and “shared mental model.” Clinical ladder progression was associated with both compassion and a shared mental model. Furthermore, compassion was identified as a factor that increased the probability of various incidents through interactional failures. Contrastingly, the shared mental model enhanced the probability of severe incidents due to judgmental and minor incidents from conceptual failures. This study developed a psychological scale to measure nursing explanation skills in communicating with patients, their families, and other medical staff and elucidated their impact on incident occurrence through miscommunication. Finally, the importance of accountability skills in nursing education and practice was discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育和实践中的护理解释技能:发展技能和对事件发生的影响
向患者、患者家属和其他医护人员提供不准确的解释会对医疗质量和患者安全产生不利影响。尽管良好的解释技能在护理教育和实践中具有重要意义,但相关的实证数据却十分有限。本研究旨在开发一个心理量表,并通过统计检验以往研究中得出的假设模型的有效性,调查解释技能对患者安全的影响。在初步调查中,从 109 名经验丰富的护士那里获得了 87 个项目。研究 1 对 1000 名护理专业人员进行了解释技能在线调查。研究 2 包括对一家综合医院的 159 名护理人员进行实地调查。研究确定了九项子技能,包括七项通用子技能和一项针对每位患者/家属和员工的特定子技能,并将其归类为 "同情心 "和 "共享心理模式"。临床阶梯式发展与同情心和共同心理模式都有关联。此外,同情心还被认为是通过互动失败增加各种事件发生概率的一个因素。与此相反,共享心智模式提高了因判断失误而导致严重事故和因概念失误而导致轻微事故的概率。本研究开发了一个心理量表,用于测量护理人员在与患者、患者家属及其他医务人员沟通时的解释技能,并阐明了这些技能因沟通失误而对事件发生的影响。最后,讨论了责任技能在护理教育和实践中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“What are we doing here?”: Reflections on developing a transcultural “Road Map” for global menstrual hygiene management Analysis of nurses’ intention to resign and its reasons in a tertiary Grade-A hospital in Beijing during the post-pandemic era Utilizing learning communities to enhance classroom and clinical synergy across the curriculum Contraceptive use in the Gaza Strip: A systematic review Supporting graduate students’ skills with simulated experiences in a professional foundation course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1