A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE PERCEPTION OF PHYSICAL THERAPIST AND PHYSICAL THERAPY STUDENTS ABOUT USABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CHATBOT I.E, OPENAI-CHATGPT FOR THE RETRIEVAL OF INFORMATION IN ACADEMIC AND CLINICAL SETTINGS

Sab Shahzad, I. Shahid, M. Nouman, R. Anis, S. Asif, MU Khan
{"title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE PERCEPTION OF PHYSICAL THERAPIST AND PHYSICAL THERAPY STUDENTS ABOUT USABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CHATBOT I.E, OPENAI-CHATGPT FOR THE RETRIEVAL OF INFORMATION IN ACADEMIC AND CLINICAL SETTINGS","authors":"Sab Shahzad, I. Shahid, M. Nouman, R. Anis, S. Asif, MU Khan","doi":"10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the modern era dominated by technological advancements, artificial intelligence (AI) has transcended the realm of science fiction to become a pivotal aspect of various fields, including health sciences. AI innovations like ChatGPT, an AI-based chatbot, have sparked discussions regarding their practical applications in healthcare and academia. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to assess and compare the perceptions of physical therapists and physical therapy students regarding the usability of ChatGPT for information retrieval in academic and clinical settings. Method: A cross-sectional study design was employed. The sample size, calculated to be 176 using G*Power analysis, was equally divided into two groups: 88 physical therapists and 88 physical therapy students. Data collection was conducted via Google Forms and manual questionnaires. Result: Out of the respondents, 39 (47.6%) physical therapy students and 43 (52.4%) physical therapists reported that they perceived ChatGPT and related AI technologies as effective tools for enhancing job performance and academic studies. Additionally, 49 physical therapy students and 52 physical therapists found AI chatbots easy to use. However, statistical analysis revealed no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the perceptions of usability between the two groups. Conclusion: The study concluded that physical therapists and physical therapy students share similar perceptions regarding the usability of AI chatbots like ChatGPT for information retrieval in clinical and academic settings. A significant majority of both groups acknowledged the potential benefits of these technologies, highlighting their applicability in professional and educational environments.","PeriodicalId":504575,"journal":{"name":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the modern era dominated by technological advancements, artificial intelligence (AI) has transcended the realm of science fiction to become a pivotal aspect of various fields, including health sciences. AI innovations like ChatGPT, an AI-based chatbot, have sparked discussions regarding their practical applications in healthcare and academia. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to assess and compare the perceptions of physical therapists and physical therapy students regarding the usability of ChatGPT for information retrieval in academic and clinical settings. Method: A cross-sectional study design was employed. The sample size, calculated to be 176 using G*Power analysis, was equally divided into two groups: 88 physical therapists and 88 physical therapy students. Data collection was conducted via Google Forms and manual questionnaires. Result: Out of the respondents, 39 (47.6%) physical therapy students and 43 (52.4%) physical therapists reported that they perceived ChatGPT and related AI technologies as effective tools for enhancing job performance and academic studies. Additionally, 49 physical therapy students and 52 physical therapists found AI chatbots easy to use. However, statistical analysis revealed no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the perceptions of usability between the two groups. Conclusion: The study concluded that physical therapists and physical therapy students share similar perceptions regarding the usability of AI chatbots like ChatGPT for information retrieval in clinical and academic settings. A significant majority of both groups acknowledged the potential benefits of these technologies, highlighting their applicability in professional and educational environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于物理治疗师和物理治疗专业学生对人工智能聊天机器人(openai-chatgpt)在学术和临床环境中检索信息的可用性看法的比较研究
在以技术进步为主导的现代,人工智能(AI)已经超越了科幻小说的范畴,成为包括健康科学在内的各个领域的一个关键方面。像基于人工智能的聊天机器人 ChatGPT 这样的人工智能创新引发了有关其在医疗保健和学术界实际应用的讨论。研究目的本研究的主要目的是评估和比较物理治疗师和物理治疗专业学生对 ChatGPT 在学术和临床环境中信息检索可用性的看法。研究方法采用横断面研究设计。采用 G*Power 分析法计算出样本量为 176 个,并将样本平均分为两组:88 名物理治疗师和 88 名物理治疗专业学生。数据收集通过谷歌表格和手工问卷进行。结果:在受访者中,39 名(47.6%)物理治疗专业学生和 43 名(52.4%)物理治疗师表示,他们认为 ChatGPT 和相关人工智能技术是提高工作绩效和学术研究的有效工具。此外,49 名物理治疗专业学生和 52 名物理治疗师认为人工智能聊天机器人易于使用。不过,统计分析显示,两组人对可用性的看法没有明显差异(P > 0.05)。结论研究得出结论,物理治疗师和物理治疗专业学生对 ChatGPT 等人工智能聊天机器人在临床和学术环境中用于信息检索的可用性有着相似的看法。两个群体中的绝大多数人都承认这些技术的潜在优势,强调了它们在专业和教育环境中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DOES PREOPERATIVE COUNSELLING HELP IMPROVE PATIENTS’ SATISFACTION WITH PAIN MANAGEMENT IN POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN PAKISTANI PATIENTS UNDERGOING PCI: A MULTICENTER STUDY EVALUATION OF CHICKPEA VARIETIES FOR CLIMATE RESILIENCE AND YIELD STABILITY AT DIFFERENT PLANTING DATES A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANESTHETIC BLOCK TECHNIQUES (V-BLOCK VS. H-BLOCK) FOR REMOVAL OF INGROWN TOENAIL ROLE OF CHYMOTRYPSIN IN POST-OPERATIVE WOUND MANAGEMENT IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR SURGERIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1