Integrated approach of predicting rock stability in high mountain valley underground caverns

IF 8.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Underground Space Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1016/j.undsp.2024.04.005
Fuyuan Tan , Haosen Guo , Pengzhi Pan , Zhaofeng Wang , Xufeng Liu , Yangyi Zhou
{"title":"Integrated approach of predicting rock stability in high mountain valley underground caverns","authors":"Fuyuan Tan ,&nbsp;Haosen Guo ,&nbsp;Pengzhi Pan ,&nbsp;Zhaofeng Wang ,&nbsp;Xufeng Liu ,&nbsp;Yangyi Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.undsp.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High mountain valleys are characterized by the development of intricate ground stress fields due to geological processes such as tectonic stress, river erosion, and rock weathering. These processes introduce considerable stability concerns in the surrounding rock formations for underground engineering projects in these regions, highlighting the imperative need for rigorous stability assessments during the design phase to ensure construction safety. This paper introduces an innovative approach for the pre-evaluation of the stability of surrounding rocks in underground caverns situated within high mountain valleys. The methodology comprises several pivotal steps. Initially, we conduct inverse calculations of the ground stress field in complex geological terrains, combining field monitoring and numerical simulations. Subsequently, we ascertain stress-strength ratios of the surrounding rocks using various rock strength criteria. To assess the stability characteristics of the surrounding rocks in the 1<sup>#</sup> spillway cave within our project area, we employ numerical simulations to compute stress-strength ratios based on different rock strength criteria. Furthermore, we undertake a comparative analysis, utilizing data from the 5<sup>#</sup> Underground Laboratory (Lab 5) of Jinping II Hydropower Station, aligning the chosen rock strength criterion with the damage characteristics of Lab 5′s surrounding rocks. This analysis serves as the cornerstone for evaluating other mechanical responses of the surrounding rocks, thereby validating the pre-evaluation methodology. Our pre-evaluation method takes into account the intricate geological evolution processes specific to high mountain valleys. It also considers the influence of the initial geostress field within the geological range of underground caverns. This comprehensive approach provides a robust foundation for the analysis and assessment of the stability of surrounding rocks, especially in high mountain valley areas, during the design phase of underground engineering projects. The insights derived from this analysis hold substantial practical significance for the effective guidance of such projects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48505,"journal":{"name":"Underground Space","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 317-341"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000746/pdfft?md5=0f212efa334d36d48b5f77f1824979d9&pid=1-s2.0-S2467967424000746-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Underground Space","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000746","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High mountain valleys are characterized by the development of intricate ground stress fields due to geological processes such as tectonic stress, river erosion, and rock weathering. These processes introduce considerable stability concerns in the surrounding rock formations for underground engineering projects in these regions, highlighting the imperative need for rigorous stability assessments during the design phase to ensure construction safety. This paper introduces an innovative approach for the pre-evaluation of the stability of surrounding rocks in underground caverns situated within high mountain valleys. The methodology comprises several pivotal steps. Initially, we conduct inverse calculations of the ground stress field in complex geological terrains, combining field monitoring and numerical simulations. Subsequently, we ascertain stress-strength ratios of the surrounding rocks using various rock strength criteria. To assess the stability characteristics of the surrounding rocks in the 1# spillway cave within our project area, we employ numerical simulations to compute stress-strength ratios based on different rock strength criteria. Furthermore, we undertake a comparative analysis, utilizing data from the 5# Underground Laboratory (Lab 5) of Jinping II Hydropower Station, aligning the chosen rock strength criterion with the damage characteristics of Lab 5′s surrounding rocks. This analysis serves as the cornerstone for evaluating other mechanical responses of the surrounding rocks, thereby validating the pre-evaluation methodology. Our pre-evaluation method takes into account the intricate geological evolution processes specific to high mountain valleys. It also considers the influence of the initial geostress field within the geological range of underground caverns. This comprehensive approach provides a robust foundation for the analysis and assessment of the stability of surrounding rocks, especially in high mountain valley areas, during the design phase of underground engineering projects. The insights derived from this analysis hold substantial practical significance for the effective guidance of such projects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测高山峡谷地下洞穴岩石稳定性的综合方法
高山峡谷的特点是,由于构造应力、河流侵蚀和岩石风化等地质过程,形成了错综复杂的地应力场。这些过程为这些地区的地下工程项目带来了相当大的围岩稳定性问题,突出了在设计阶段进行严格的稳定性评估以确保施工安全的迫切需要。本文介绍了一种创新方法,用于对位于高山峡谷中的地下岩洞的围岩稳定性进行预先评估。该方法包括几个关键步骤。首先,我们结合实地监测和数值模拟,对复杂地质地形中的地应力场进行反演计算。随后,我们利用各种岩石强度标准确定围岩的应力强度比。为了评估项目区域内 1#泄洪洞围岩的稳定性特征,我们采用了数值模拟方法,根据不同的岩石强度标准计算应力强度比。此外,我们还利用锦屏二水电站 5#地下实验室(5#实验室)的数据进行了对比分析,将所选的岩石强度标准与 5#实验室围岩的破坏特征相一致。这一分析为评估围岩的其他力学响应奠定了基础,从而验证了预评估方法。我们的预评估方法考虑到了高山峡谷特有的复杂地质演变过程。它还考虑了地下溶洞地质范围内初始地应力场的影响。这种综合方法为在地下工程项目设计阶段分析和评估围岩稳定性(尤其是在高山峡谷地区)奠定了坚实的基础。从这一分析中得出的见解对有效指导此类工程具有重要的现实意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Underground Space
Underground Space ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Underground Space is an open access international journal without article processing charges (APC) committed to serving as a scientific forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of underground engineering. The journal welcomes manuscripts that deal with original theories, methods, technologies, and important applications throughout the life-cycle of underground projects, including planning, design, operation and maintenance, disaster prevention, and demolition. The journal is particularly interested in manuscripts related to the latest development of smart underground engineering from the perspectives of resilience, resources saving, environmental friendliness, humanity, and artificial intelligence. The manuscripts are expected to have significant innovation and potential impact in the field of underground engineering, and should have clear association with or application in underground projects.
期刊最新文献
Series of centrifuge shaking table tests study on seismic response of subway station structures in soft soil sites Analysis of hydraulic breakdown and seepage of tail sealing system in shield tunnel machines Back analysis of geomechanical parameters based on a data augmentation algorithm and machine learning technique Characteristics of deformation and defect of shield tunnel in coastal structured soil in China Numerical analysis of a deep and oversized group excavation: A case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1