Exploring factors impacting patient decisions in hemorrhoid surgery: A questionnaire survey in Taiwan

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY Surgery open science Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2024.07.009
Pin-Chun Chen MD , Chih-I Chen PhD
{"title":"Exploring factors impacting patient decisions in hemorrhoid surgery: A questionnaire survey in Taiwan","authors":"Pin-Chun Chen MD ,&nbsp;Chih-I Chen PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Minimally invasive hemorrhoid surgeries like Doppler-Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation (DGHAL) and Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (PPH) offer benefits over traditional methods. This study investigated public perceptions and attitudes towards these surgeries, exploring awareness, preferences, and influencing factors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A detailed questionnaire was disseminated to 2011 participants from various regions of Taiwan in December 2023, gathering data on demographics, understanding of minimally invasive surgery, and attitudes towards hemorrhoid surgery. Chi-square tests were used for analysis (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Hemorrhoid prevalence was similar across sexes and age groups. About 70 % preferred medical centers or district hospitals for surgery. Postoperative complications were a primary concern, with significant sex differences. Approximately 70 % preferred minimally invasive surgery if costs were below NT$50,000. Medical personnel showed higher awareness of minimally invasive surgery benefits. Most participants relied on personal networks and medical social media for information.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study revealed generally positive perceptions of minimally invasive hemorrhoid surgery, with cost being a significant factor. Knowledge gaps exist, particularly among non-medical personnel. Future initiatives should aim to enhance public awareness of minimally invasive surgery benefits, and policy considerations should address financial aspects of healthcare decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258984502400109X/pdfft?md5=e1960d05fb69fd82a97c5dc8b0e7cba2&pid=1-s2.0-S258984502400109X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258984502400109X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive hemorrhoid surgeries like Doppler-Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation (DGHAL) and Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (PPH) offer benefits over traditional methods. This study investigated public perceptions and attitudes towards these surgeries, exploring awareness, preferences, and influencing factors.

Methods

A detailed questionnaire was disseminated to 2011 participants from various regions of Taiwan in December 2023, gathering data on demographics, understanding of minimally invasive surgery, and attitudes towards hemorrhoid surgery. Chi-square tests were used for analysis (p < 0.05).

Results

Hemorrhoid prevalence was similar across sexes and age groups. About 70 % preferred medical centers or district hospitals for surgery. Postoperative complications were a primary concern, with significant sex differences. Approximately 70 % preferred minimally invasive surgery if costs were below NT$50,000. Medical personnel showed higher awareness of minimally invasive surgery benefits. Most participants relied on personal networks and medical social media for information.

Conclusions

The study revealed generally positive perceptions of minimally invasive hemorrhoid surgery, with cost being a significant factor. Knowledge gaps exist, particularly among non-medical personnel. Future initiatives should aim to enhance public awareness of minimally invasive surgery benefits, and policy considerations should address financial aspects of healthcare decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索影响痔疮手术患者决定的因素:台湾问卷调查
背景多普勒引导下痔动脉结扎术(DGHAL)和带钉痔疮环切术(PPH)等微创痔疮手术比传统方法更有优势。本研究调查了公众对这些手术的看法和态度,探讨了公众对这些手术的认知、偏好和影响因素。研究方法于2023年12月向来自台湾不同地区的2011名参与者发放了详细的调查问卷,收集了人口统计学、对微创手术的理解以及对痔疮手术的态度等数据。结果不同性别和年龄组的痔疮患病率相似。约 70% 的人首选医疗中心或地区医院进行手术。术后并发症是主要问题,性别差异显著。如果费用低于新台币 50,000 元,约 70% 的人首选微创手术。医务人员对微创手术益处的认知度较高。大多数参与者依靠个人网络和医疗社交媒体获取信息。知识缺口依然存在,尤其是非医务人员。未来的举措应旨在提高公众对微创手术益处的认识,政策考虑因素应涉及医疗决策的财务方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Immersive collaborative virtual reality for case-based graduate student teaching in thoracic surgery: A piloting study Rapid liver graft implantation in canine: A preliminary study A nomogram for cancer-specific survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients: A SEER based analysis Investigation and self-assessment of liver transplantation training physicians at Shanghai Renji Hospital: A preliminary study Optimizing the role of scrub nurses during robotic surgery console time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1