Effects of forage feeding level on ruminal pH and metabolic adaptation of the rumen epithelium in pre-weaned Jersey calves

IF 1.9 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Veterinary and Animal Science Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.vas.2024.100384
Madeline N. Bennett , Dana E. McCurdy , Anne H. Laarman
{"title":"Effects of forage feeding level on ruminal pH and metabolic adaptation of the rumen epithelium in pre-weaned Jersey calves","authors":"Madeline N. Bennett ,&nbsp;Dana E. McCurdy ,&nbsp;Anne H. Laarman","doi":"10.1016/j.vas.2024.100384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of this study was to determine the effect of limiting forage provision in pre-weaned calves on ruminal pH and short chain fatty acid (SCFA) transport capacity during the pre-weaning period. Twelve Jersey bull calves (age = 1.9 ± 0.8 d) were housed individually on sand. All calves were fed milk replacer at 1,200 g/d and texturized grain-based starter ad libitum from birth. Calves were randomly assigned one of two treatments: ad libitum forage (<strong>ALF</strong>) or limited forage provision, where forage was limited to 90 g/d as-fed (<strong>LFP</strong>). Individual feed intake was recorded daily, calf weights, and jugular blood samples were collected weekly. Once calves consumed 680 g/d of calf starter, ruminal pH was measured for seven days after which calves were humanely killed and rumen fluid sampled. During the pre-weaning period, starter intake, feed efficiency, plasma glucose and β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) concentration, SCFA concentration, average daily gain, and body weight were not different between treatments. Forage intake for ALF calves was greater than LFP beginning at wk 9 (255 ± 34 vs. 71 ± 40 g/d, respectively). Compared to ALF, LFP decreased mean ruminal pH (6.38 ± 0.16 vs. 5.98 ± 0.23) and duration of time where rumen pH was below 5.8 (796 ± 145 vs. 261 ± 133 min/d). Epithelial markers of SCFA transport and cell homeostasis (MCT1, NBC1, NHE3) were not affected by treatment. In conclusion, incidence of sub-acute ruminal acidosis in limited forage-fed calves did not have the same effects on intake and nutrient transporters seen in adult cows.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37152,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and Animal Science","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451943X24000516/pdfft?md5=8042d6542506bd6d7017856c6769ce73&pid=1-s2.0-S2451943X24000516-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451943X24000516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of limiting forage provision in pre-weaned calves on ruminal pH and short chain fatty acid (SCFA) transport capacity during the pre-weaning period. Twelve Jersey bull calves (age = 1.9 ± 0.8 d) were housed individually on sand. All calves were fed milk replacer at 1,200 g/d and texturized grain-based starter ad libitum from birth. Calves were randomly assigned one of two treatments: ad libitum forage (ALF) or limited forage provision, where forage was limited to 90 g/d as-fed (LFP). Individual feed intake was recorded daily, calf weights, and jugular blood samples were collected weekly. Once calves consumed 680 g/d of calf starter, ruminal pH was measured for seven days after which calves were humanely killed and rumen fluid sampled. During the pre-weaning period, starter intake, feed efficiency, plasma glucose and β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) concentration, SCFA concentration, average daily gain, and body weight were not different between treatments. Forage intake for ALF calves was greater than LFP beginning at wk 9 (255 ± 34 vs. 71 ± 40 g/d, respectively). Compared to ALF, LFP decreased mean ruminal pH (6.38 ± 0.16 vs. 5.98 ± 0.23) and duration of time where rumen pH was below 5.8 (796 ± 145 vs. 261 ± 133 min/d). Epithelial markers of SCFA transport and cell homeostasis (MCT1, NBC1, NHE3) were not affected by treatment. In conclusion, incidence of sub-acute ruminal acidosis in limited forage-fed calves did not have the same effects on intake and nutrient transporters seen in adult cows.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饲草饲喂量对断奶前泽西牛犊瘤胃pH值和瘤胃上皮代谢适应性的影响
本研究旨在确定断奶前犊牛在断奶前期间限制饲草供给对瘤胃 pH 值和短链脂肪酸 (SCFA) 运输能力的影响。12 头泽西牛犊(日龄 = 1.9 ± 0.8 d)被单独饲养在沙地上。所有犊牛从出生起每天自由采食 1200 克代乳品和膨化谷物开食料。犊牛被随机分配到两种处理之一:自由采食草料(ALF)或限量饲喂草料(LFP),其中限量饲喂草料为 90 克/天。每天记录个体采食量、犊牛体重,每周采集颈静脉血样。犊牛每天摄入 680 克犊牛开食料后,连续七天测量瘤胃 pH 值,然后将犊牛人道处死并采集瘤胃液样本。在断奶前期间,不同处理间的开食量、饲料效率、血浆葡萄糖和β-羟基丁酸(BHB)浓度、SCFA浓度、平均日增重和体重均无差异。从第 9 周开始,ALF 小牛的饲料摄入量高于 LFP(分别为 255 ± 34 克/天和 71 ± 40 克/天)。与 ALF 相比,LFP 降低了平均瘤胃 pH 值(6.38 ± 0.16 vs. 5.98 ± 0.23)和瘤胃 pH 值低于 5.8 的持续时间(796 ± 145 vs. 261 ± 133 分钟/天)。SCFA转运和细胞稳态的上皮标记物(MCT1、NBC1、NHE3)未受治疗影响。总之,有限饲喂饲料的犊牛发生亚急性瘤胃酸中毒对成年奶牛的摄入量和营养物质转运产生的影响并不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary and Animal Science
Veterinary and Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
A systematic review and meta-analysis of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia in Ethiopian cattle Does transport affect the eating quality potential of beef from Limousin cows in France? - A case study Comparison of two methods of extracting bull epididymal spermatozoa Cattle, sheep, and goat humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 Effect of vaccine diluents on the colonization of Salmonella Typhimurium vaccine in chickens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1