Split bond ratings: Evidence from Japanese credit rating agencies

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Research in International Business and Finance Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102468
{"title":"Split bond ratings: Evidence from Japanese credit rating agencies","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines why split bond ratings occur between credit rating agencies with different reputations in Japan. Using a sample of Japanese corporate bonds newly issued during the 2006–2021 period, I find that the ratings assigned by a less reputable Japanese rating agency (JCR) are significantly higher than those by a more reputable Japanese rating agency (R&amp;I) for the same bonds because JCR is likely to rate the creditworthiness of bond issuers more highly than R&amp;I. The disagreement between JCR and R&amp;I over the creditworthiness of issuers causes split bond ratings. Moreover, bonds with multiple split ratings have higher yield spreads.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924002617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines why split bond ratings occur between credit rating agencies with different reputations in Japan. Using a sample of Japanese corporate bonds newly issued during the 2006–2021 period, I find that the ratings assigned by a less reputable Japanese rating agency (JCR) are significantly higher than those by a more reputable Japanese rating agency (R&I) for the same bonds because JCR is likely to rate the creditworthiness of bond issuers more highly than R&I. The disagreement between JCR and R&I over the creditworthiness of issuers causes split bond ratings. Moreover, bonds with multiple split ratings have higher yield spreads.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分割债券评级:来自日本信用评级机构的证据
本研究探讨了日本不同声誉的信用评级机构之间为何会出现债券评级分化。通过对 2006-2021 年间新发行的日本企业债券进行抽样调查,笔者发现,对于相同的债券,声誉较低的日本评级机构(JCR)给予的评级明显高于声誉较高的日本评级机构(R&I),因为 JCR 对债券发行人的信用评级可能高于 R&I。JCR 和 R&I 对发行人信用度的分歧会导致债券评级的分裂。此外,有多个分级的债券收益率差也较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.20%
发文量
240
期刊介绍: Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance
期刊最新文献
Multiscale cross-sector tail credit risk spillovers in China: Evidence from EEMD-based VAR quantile analysis Uncovering patterns of fintech behavior in Italian banks: A multidimensional statistical analysis The impact of digital transformation on the servitization transformation of manufacturing firms Do oil price shocks drive systematic risk premia in stock markets? A novel investment application Signaling vs. agency theory: What drives dividends of promoter-owned firms during a crisis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1