Failure analysis of a separator under various thermal loading: A numerical study

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105399
{"title":"Failure analysis of a separator under various thermal loading: A numerical study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the present study, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were carried out on a separator subjected to three different fire scenarios: pool fire, jet fire and fireballs. The empirical models applicable to such plants are not developed and conventional radiation models leads to an overestimation of the heat flux and safety distances. Therefore an alternative tool like CFD along with empirical models is used to model the potential scenarios mentioned above in a model oil and gas separator plant. The developed model were validated by comparing literature data on the flame length, maximum flame temperature and its location above pan surface in case of pool fire and comparing them with literature data. It is found that in case of flame length the deviation from literature data was about 10% and less than 5% for the maximum flame temperature. For jet fire the average surface temperature was 561 K while this value is 423 K in case of pool fire and 317 K for fireballs. When it comes to the radiative flux, an average value of 29 kW/m<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> is found for jet fires while this value was only 14 kW/m<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> for pool fire and 23 kW/m<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> for fireballs. The thermal loads on the separator vessel due to above fire scenarios were also calculated. The obtained value of thermal stresses were around 285 MPa and 600 MPa for pool and jet fires respectively. Thus it can be concluded that from safety point of view jet fires are the most critical one. The results obtained form simulations were also compared with that of data from empirical models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423024001578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present study, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were carried out on a separator subjected to three different fire scenarios: pool fire, jet fire and fireballs. The empirical models applicable to such plants are not developed and conventional radiation models leads to an overestimation of the heat flux and safety distances. Therefore an alternative tool like CFD along with empirical models is used to model the potential scenarios mentioned above in a model oil and gas separator plant. The developed model were validated by comparing literature data on the flame length, maximum flame temperature and its location above pan surface in case of pool fire and comparing them with literature data. It is found that in case of flame length the deviation from literature data was about 10% and less than 5% for the maximum flame temperature. For jet fire the average surface temperature was 561 K while this value is 423 K in case of pool fire and 317 K for fireballs. When it comes to the radiative flux, an average value of 29 kW/m2 is found for jet fires while this value was only 14 kW/m2 for pool fire and 23 kW/m2 for fireballs. The thermal loads on the separator vessel due to above fire scenarios were also calculated. The obtained value of thermal stresses were around 285 MPa and 600 MPa for pool and jet fires respectively. Thus it can be concluded that from safety point of view jet fires are the most critical one. The results obtained form simulations were also compared with that of data from empirical models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各种热负荷下分离器的失效分析:数值研究
在本研究中,对分离器进行了计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟,模拟了三种不同的火灾情况:池火、喷射火和火球。适用于此类工厂的经验模型尚未开发,传统的辐射模型会导致高估热通量和安全距离。因此,我们使用 CFD 等替代工具和经验模型来模拟油气分离厂模型中的上述潜在情况。通过比较池火时的火焰长度、最大火焰温度及其在锅表面以上的位置等文献数据,对所开发的模型进行了验证。结果发现,火焰长度与文献数据的偏差约为 10%,火焰最高温度与文献数据的偏差小于 5%。喷射火焰的平均表面温度为 561 K,而池火的平均表面温度为 423 K,火球的平均表面温度为 317 K。在辐射通量方面,喷射火焰的平均值为 29 kW/m2,而池火的平均值仅为 14 kW/m2,火球的平均值为 23 kW/m2。此外,还计算了上述火灾情况对分离器容器造成的热负荷。池火和喷射火的热应力值分别约为 285 兆帕和 600 兆帕。因此可以得出结论,从安全角度来看,喷射火灾是最严重的火灾。模拟结果还与经验模型的数据进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
期刊最新文献
Research on the diffusion and control of unsafe behaviors among chemical industry park enterprises based on the SEIR evolutionary game model Experimental study on hydrogen pipeline leakage: Negative pressure wave characteristics and inline detection method A dynamic system reliability analysis model on safety instrumented systems Effect of ambient pressure on the fire characteristics of lithium-ion battery energy storage container Incident investigation of hydrogen explosion and fire in a residue desulfurization process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1