Robustness of radiomics features on 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging for magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy

Morgan Michalet , Gladis Valenzuela , Pierre Debuire , Olivier Riou , David Azria , Stéphanie Nougaret , Marion Tardieu
{"title":"Robustness of radiomics features on 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging for magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy","authors":"Morgan Michalet ,&nbsp;Gladis Valenzuela ,&nbsp;Pierre Debuire ,&nbsp;Olivier Riou ,&nbsp;David Azria ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Nougaret ,&nbsp;Marion Tardieu","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>MR-guided radiotherapy adds the precision of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to the therapeutic benefits of a linear accelerator. Prior to each therapeutic session, an MRI generates a significant volume of imaging data ripe for analysis. Radiomics stands at the forefront of medical imaging and oncology research, dedicated to mining quantitative imaging attributes to forge predictive models. However, the robustness of these models is often challenged.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>To assess the robustness of feature extraction, we conducted reproducibility studies using a 0.35 T MR-linac system, employing both a specialized phantom and patient-derived images, focusing on cases of pancreatic cancer. We extracted shape-based, first-order and textural features from patient-derived images and only first-order and textural features from phantom-derived images. The impact of the delay between simulation and first fraction images was also assessed with an equivalence test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 107 features evaluated, 58 (54 %) were considered as non-reproducible: 18 were uniformly inconsistent across both phantom and patient images, 9 were specific to phantom-based analysis, and 31 to patient-derived data.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings show that a significant proportion of radiomic features extracted from this dual dataset were unreliable. It is essential to discard these non-reproducible elements to refine and enhance radiomic model development, particularly for MR-guided radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100613"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000836/pdfft?md5=a1d7bc7fab2c42024091aef306d09d95&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000836-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

MR-guided radiotherapy adds the precision of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to the therapeutic benefits of a linear accelerator. Prior to each therapeutic session, an MRI generates a significant volume of imaging data ripe for analysis. Radiomics stands at the forefront of medical imaging and oncology research, dedicated to mining quantitative imaging attributes to forge predictive models. However, the robustness of these models is often challenged.

Materials and methods

To assess the robustness of feature extraction, we conducted reproducibility studies using a 0.35 T MR-linac system, employing both a specialized phantom and patient-derived images, focusing on cases of pancreatic cancer. We extracted shape-based, first-order and textural features from patient-derived images and only first-order and textural features from phantom-derived images. The impact of the delay between simulation and first fraction images was also assessed with an equivalence test.

Results

From 107 features evaluated, 58 (54 %) were considered as non-reproducible: 18 were uniformly inconsistent across both phantom and patient images, 9 were specific to phantom-based analysis, and 31 to patient-derived data.

Conclusion

Our findings show that a significant proportion of radiomic features extracted from this dual dataset were unreliable. It is essential to discard these non-reproducible elements to refine and enhance radiomic model development, particularly for MR-guided radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
0.35 T 磁共振成像的放射组学特征在磁共振引导的放射治疗中的稳健性
背景和目的磁共振引导放疗将磁共振成像(MRI)的精确性与直线加速器的治疗优势相结合。每次治疗前,核磁共振成像都会生成大量成像数据,以供分析。放射组学站在医学成像和肿瘤学研究的前沿,致力于挖掘定量成像属性以建立预测模型。材料和方法为了评估特征提取的稳健性,我们使用 0.35 T MR-linac 系统进行了可重复性研究,同时采用了专用模型和患者衍生图像,重点研究胰腺癌病例。我们从患者来源图像中提取了基于形状的一阶特征和纹理特征,仅从模型来源图像中提取了一阶特征和纹理特征。结果在评估的 107 个特征中,有 58 个(54%)被认为是不可再现的:18 个在模型和患者图像中都不一致,9 个是基于模型的分析所特有的,31 个是基于患者数据的分析所特有的。我们的研究结果表明,从这一双重数据集中提取的放射学特征有很大一部分是不可靠的,必须摒弃这些不可再现的元素,以完善和加强放射学模型的开发,尤其是在磁共振引导下的胰腺癌放射治疗方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Results of 2023 survey on the use of synthetic computed tomography for magnetic resonance Imaging-only radiotherapy: Current status and future steps Head and neck automatic multi-organ segmentation on Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Automatic segmentation for magnetic resonance imaging guided individual elective lymph node irradiation in head and neck cancer patients Development of a novel 3D-printed dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom for evaluation of four-dimensional computed tomography Technical feasibility of delivering a simultaneous integrated boost in partial breast irradiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1