Adapted approaches to initial fluid management of patients with major burns in resource-limited settings: A systematic review

Kai Hsun Hsiao , Joseph Kalanzi , Stuart B Watson , Srinivas Murthy , Ani Movsisyan , Kavita Kothari , Flavio Salio , Pryanka Relan
{"title":"Adapted approaches to initial fluid management of patients with major burns in resource-limited settings: A systematic review","authors":"Kai Hsun Hsiao ,&nbsp;Joseph Kalanzi ,&nbsp;Stuart B Watson ,&nbsp;Srinivas Murthy ,&nbsp;Ani Movsisyan ,&nbsp;Kavita Kothari ,&nbsp;Flavio Salio ,&nbsp;Pryanka Relan","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Resource limitations in settings such as burn mass casualty incidents (MCIs) present challenges to the judicious fluid resuscitation required for major burns. Previous recommendations for burns care in MCIs have suggested certain adaptations from routine care, such as delaying intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation until arrival at facility; using a fluid calculation formula that is independent of percentage of total body surface area (%TBSA) burned; or using fluid calculation formula based on time of arrival to first receiving facility rather than from time of injury, thus omitting ‘catch-up’ fluid.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To synthesize and assess certainty of evidence from resource-limited settings on the three adaptations to fluid resuscitation for patients with major burns in MCIs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched on 8 September 2023 with an update search on 8 July 2024. Primary quantitative studies in resource-limited settings meeting eligibility criteria as assessed by two reviewers were included. Where available, outcome effects for these adaptations compared to routine burns care were calculated. Evidence certainty was determined by GRADE.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two eligible studies were identified from 544 search results. One study with 48 participants provided very uncertain evidence that delayed IV fluid resuscitation may increase acute kidney injury compared to prehospital resuscitation (OR 2.48, 95% CI 0.58–10.62). The other study with a cohort of 10 children provided very uncertain evidence that calculating fluid requirements based on time of arrival to first receiving facility, i.e. omitting ‘catch-up’ fluids, may maintain adequate urine output and be associated with no complications of fluid over- or under-resuscitation. There were no studies on use of a simplified %TBSA-independent fluid calculation formula.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is very limited and uncertain evidence to inform on delayed IV fluid resuscitation, simplified %TBSA-independent formula, and omission of ‘catch up’ fluids for burns care in MCIs. Contextual factors, local values, preferences and feasibility also need to be considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000531/pdfft?md5=503b28a1d46468b83036d3c4961eb5b4&pid=1-s2.0-S2468912224000531-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Resource limitations in settings such as burn mass casualty incidents (MCIs) present challenges to the judicious fluid resuscitation required for major burns. Previous recommendations for burns care in MCIs have suggested certain adaptations from routine care, such as delaying intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation until arrival at facility; using a fluid calculation formula that is independent of percentage of total body surface area (%TBSA) burned; or using fluid calculation formula based on time of arrival to first receiving facility rather than from time of injury, thus omitting ‘catch-up’ fluid.

Objectives

To synthesize and assess certainty of evidence from resource-limited settings on the three adaptations to fluid resuscitation for patients with major burns in MCIs.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched on 8 September 2023 with an update search on 8 July 2024. Primary quantitative studies in resource-limited settings meeting eligibility criteria as assessed by two reviewers were included. Where available, outcome effects for these adaptations compared to routine burns care were calculated. Evidence certainty was determined by GRADE.

Results

Two eligible studies were identified from 544 search results. One study with 48 participants provided very uncertain evidence that delayed IV fluid resuscitation may increase acute kidney injury compared to prehospital resuscitation (OR 2.48, 95% CI 0.58–10.62). The other study with a cohort of 10 children provided very uncertain evidence that calculating fluid requirements based on time of arrival to first receiving facility, i.e. omitting ‘catch-up’ fluids, may maintain adequate urine output and be associated with no complications of fluid over- or under-resuscitation. There were no studies on use of a simplified %TBSA-independent fluid calculation formula.

Conclusions

There is very limited and uncertain evidence to inform on delayed IV fluid resuscitation, simplified %TBSA-independent formula, and omission of ‘catch up’ fluids for burns care in MCIs. Contextual factors, local values, preferences and feasibility also need to be considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在资源有限的环境中对重度烧伤患者进行初始输液管理的适应性方法:系统回顾
背景烧伤大面积伤亡事件(MCIs)等环境中的资源限制给重大烧伤所需的合理液体复苏带来了挑战。以往针对 MCI 中烧伤护理的建议提出了一些与常规护理不同的调整措施,例如将静脉注射液(IV)复苏延迟到到达医疗机构之后;使用与烧伤总体表面积(%TBSA)百分比无关的液体计算公式;或使用基于到达第一接收机构时间而非受伤时间的液体计算公式,从而省略 "补液"。方法于 2023 年 9 月 8 日检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 图书馆,并于 2024 年 7 月 8 日进行了更新检索。经两名审稿人评估,符合资格标准的资源有限环境中的主要定量研究均被纳入。在可用的情况下,计算了这些适应性治疗与常规烧伤护理相比的结果效果。结果从 544 项搜索结果中确定了两项符合条件的研究。其中一项有 48 人参与的研究提供了非常不确定的证据,即与院前复苏相比,延迟静脉输液复苏可能会增加急性肾损伤(OR 2.48,95% CI 0.58-10.62)。另一项由 10 名儿童组成的研究提供了非常不确定的证据,即根据到达第一家接收机构的时间计算液体需求量,即省略 "补液 "液体,可以保持足够的尿量,并且不会出现液体复苏过度或不足的并发症。结论在 MCIs 烧伤护理中,关于延迟静脉输液复苏、简化的与 TBSA 无关的百分比计算公式以及省略 "补液 "的证据非常有限且不确定。此外,还需要考虑环境因素、当地价值观、偏好和可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Successful recovery of 85% TBSA burns in a resource-limited Nigerian hospital without a burns ward or intensive care unit: A case report Third-degree nasal tip burn in a preterm infant treated with amniotic membrane (Case report) A novel non-invasive treatment in deep burned patients who do not have consent to surgery How can mathematics be used to improve burn care? Benefits of the use of porcine skin for the management of toxic epidermal necrolysis injuries: Review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1