Evaluating climate models to analyze drought conditions in the western region of Bangladesh

IF 2.6 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Progress in Disaster Science Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100356
Md. Rayhan , Rounak Afroz
{"title":"Evaluating climate models to analyze drought conditions in the western region of Bangladesh","authors":"Md. Rayhan ,&nbsp;Rounak Afroz","doi":"10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Being susceptible to natural disasters, Bangladesh is one of the most disaster-prone countries. Among the various natural calamities, droughts are a frequent occurrence in the western region of the country. Hence, this study first compared the efficacy of five bias-corrected Regional Climate Models (RCMs) - MIROC, NOAA, MPI, IPSL, and CCCma - for the Western region of Bangladesh with observed monthly precipitation and subsequent SPI values. Various evaluation methods- RMSE, Taylor Diagram, Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> Test, and <em>t</em>-test, were applied to precipitation and SPI3 values for the historical base period. Through these analyses, the MIROC model exhibited the highest level of accuracy. Accordingly, future projections for short-term droughts (SPI-3) and their characteristics were conducted using the ensemble of top three climate model under the RCM 8.5 W/m<sup>2</sup> scenario. Short-term droughts are anticipated to become less frequent and severe in the 2060s and 2080s compared to the 2020s. Nonetheless, North-West region is projected to be more drought-prone than South-West until 2100. This research shows the importance of evaluating the better-fitting RCMs for assessing historical droughts and making reliable projections for the future. The methodology and findings can be employed in evidence-based decision-making and applied in other drought-prone areas to understand future drought risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52341,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Disaster Science","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100356"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000462/pdfft?md5=4ce74520ce501e1b766a451d1348c69b&pid=1-s2.0-S2590061724000462-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Disaster Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Being susceptible to natural disasters, Bangladesh is one of the most disaster-prone countries. Among the various natural calamities, droughts are a frequent occurrence in the western region of the country. Hence, this study first compared the efficacy of five bias-corrected Regional Climate Models (RCMs) - MIROC, NOAA, MPI, IPSL, and CCCma - for the Western region of Bangladesh with observed monthly precipitation and subsequent SPI values. Various evaluation methods- RMSE, Taylor Diagram, Mann–Whitney U Test, and t-test, were applied to precipitation and SPI3 values for the historical base period. Through these analyses, the MIROC model exhibited the highest level of accuracy. Accordingly, future projections for short-term droughts (SPI-3) and their characteristics were conducted using the ensemble of top three climate model under the RCM 8.5 W/m2 scenario. Short-term droughts are anticipated to become less frequent and severe in the 2060s and 2080s compared to the 2020s. Nonetheless, North-West region is projected to be more drought-prone than South-West until 2100. This research shows the importance of evaluating the better-fitting RCMs for assessing historical droughts and making reliable projections for the future. The methodology and findings can be employed in evidence-based decision-making and applied in other drought-prone areas to understand future drought risks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估气候模型以分析孟加拉国西部地区的干旱状况
孟加拉国是最容易遭受自然灾害的国家之一。在各种自然灾害中,干旱是该国西部地区经常发生的灾害。因此,本研究首先比较了 MIROC、NOAA、MPI、IPSL 和 CCCma 这五种经过偏差校正的区域气候模式(RCM)在孟加拉国西部地区的功效,以及观测到的月降水量和随后的 SPI 值。对历史基期的降水量和 SPI3 值采用了各种评估方法--均方根误差、泰勒图、曼-惠特尼 U 检验和 t 检验。通过这些分析,MIROC 模型显示出最高的准确性。因此,在 RCM 8.5 W/m2 情景下,利用三大气候模式的集合对未来短期干旱(SPI-3)及其特征进行了预测。与 2020 年代相比,预计 2060 年代和 2080 年代短期干旱的发生频率和严重程度都将降低。尽管如此,西北地区预计在 2100 年前比西南地区更容易遭受干旱。这项研究表明,评估拟合度更高的 RCM 对于评估历史干旱和对未来做出可靠预测非常重要。该方法和研究结果可用于循证决策,并应用于其他干旱多发地区,以了解未来的干旱风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Disaster Science
Progress in Disaster Science Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Disaster Science is a Gold Open Access journal focusing on integrating research and policy in disaster research, and publishes original research papers and invited viewpoint articles on disaster risk reduction; response; emergency management and recovery. A key part of the Journal's Publication output will see key experts invited to assess and comment on the current trends in disaster research, as well as highlight key papers.
期刊最新文献
Climate change increased risk of forest fire, winter storm and technical failure risks related to power transmission lines – a spatial GIS risk assessment at Cologne district, Germany Elucidating ever-changing information needs for the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake using web search queries Fire risk vulnerability and safety assessment of Farmgate area using fire risk index, Dhaka City and optimization of fire hydrant placement Small-grid urban flood prediction model using Twitter data and population GPS data - an example of the 2019 Nagano city flood Improving community understanding of cascading effects of critical infrastructure service failure: An experimental interactive learning process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1