Indirect Speaking: Images and Metaphors in Arendt’s Homage “Martin Heidegger at Eighty”

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY VOPROSY FILOSOFII Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.21146/0042-8744-2024-6-135-145
E. Kriukova, O. Koval
{"title":"Indirect Speaking: Images and Metaphors in Arendt’s Homage “Martin Heidegger at Eighty”","authors":"E. Kriukova, O. Koval","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2024-6-135-145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hannah Arendt’s report “Martin Heidegger at Eighty” is generally seen as a de­fensive speech, seemingly intended to honor his philosophical achievements at the end of his life and to mitigate the reputational damage caused by his past political mistakes. The personal relationship between Arendt and Heidegger is often cited as the reason for the disturbing fact that such a statement was made by a prominent scholar of totalitarianism. This article examines Arendt’s text from a new perspective, viewing it as a departure from Heidegger’s position rather than a celebration of it. The hypothesis is proposed by shifting the focus to the form of expression, which can provide insight into the content. The an­niversary speech is filled with poetic imagery and contains numerous allusions to both literary and philosophical works. The article analyzes Arendt’s compar­ison of Heidegger with the “hidden king”, which has its roots in the Romantic tradition. The use of Novalis’s novel, from which the title was probably bor­rowed, contributes to the discovery of additional meanings. Arendt’s text presents a semantically rich metaphor, “the storm of thinking”, that can be de­ployed through a network of intertextual references. These references include the Socratic comparison of thought to an invisible storm, the Platonic image of the storm that appears in the finale of Heidegger’s Rector’s Speech, the “wind from paradise” that picks up Benjamin’s Angel of History, and the changeability of the cloudy sky from Rilke’s “Sonnets to Orpheus”. The metaphorical structure of Arendt’s essay is explored, reflecting her own understanding of the role of language in thinking and the importance of literary discourse.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-6-135-145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hannah Arendt’s report “Martin Heidegger at Eighty” is generally seen as a de­fensive speech, seemingly intended to honor his philosophical achievements at the end of his life and to mitigate the reputational damage caused by his past political mistakes. The personal relationship between Arendt and Heidegger is often cited as the reason for the disturbing fact that such a statement was made by a prominent scholar of totalitarianism. This article examines Arendt’s text from a new perspective, viewing it as a departure from Heidegger’s position rather than a celebration of it. The hypothesis is proposed by shifting the focus to the form of expression, which can provide insight into the content. The an­niversary speech is filled with poetic imagery and contains numerous allusions to both literary and philosophical works. The article analyzes Arendt’s compar­ison of Heidegger with the “hidden king”, which has its roots in the Romantic tradition. The use of Novalis’s novel, from which the title was probably bor­rowed, contributes to the discovery of additional meanings. Arendt’s text presents a semantically rich metaphor, “the storm of thinking”, that can be de­ployed through a network of intertextual references. These references include the Socratic comparison of thought to an invisible storm, the Platonic image of the storm that appears in the finale of Heidegger’s Rector’s Speech, the “wind from paradise” that picks up Benjamin’s Angel of History, and the changeability of the cloudy sky from Rilke’s “Sonnets to Orpheus”. The metaphorical structure of Arendt’s essay is explored, reflecting her own understanding of the role of language in thinking and the importance of literary discourse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间接说话:阿伦特致敬 "八十岁的马丁-海德格尔 "中的图像与隐喻
汉娜-阿伦特的报告《八十岁的马丁-海德格尔》一般被看作是一篇辩护性的演讲,似乎是为了纪念他在生命的最后时刻所取得的哲学成就,并减轻他过去的政治错误所造成的名誉损害。阿伦特与海德格尔之间的私人关系常常被认为是一位研究极权主义的著名学者发表这样一篇令人不安的讲话的原因。本文从一个新的视角审视阿伦特的文章,将其视为对海德格尔立场的背离,而不是对其的赞美。这一假设是通过将重点转移到表达形式上提出的,而表达形式可以为内容提供启示。周年纪念演讲充满了诗意的意象,并包含大量文学和哲学著作的典故。文章分析了阿伦特将海德格尔与 "隐王 "相提并论的做法,这种做法源于浪漫主义传统。文章使用了诺瓦利斯的小说(该书的标题很可能借自诺瓦利斯的小说),这有助于发现更多的含义。阿伦特的文本提出了一个语义丰富的隐喻--"思维风暴",可以通过一个互文参照网络来使用。这些参考文献包括苏格拉底将思维比作无形的风暴、海德格尔《校长的演讲》结尾处出现的柏拉图式的风暴形象、本雅明《历史天使》中的 "天堂之风"、里尔克《致奥尔菲的十四行诗》中阴云密布的天空的多变性。文章探讨了阿伦特文章的隐喻结构,反映了她本人对语言在思维中的作用和文学话语重要性的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
期刊最新文献
The Guardian of the History of Philosophy: On Nelly Motroschilova’s Philosophical Beginnings Maimonides, Gersonides and Crescas on Prophets and Prophecy The Neurological Interpretation of the Myth-ritual Complex: Pro et Contra Worlds of Consciousness in the Context of Multiverse Conceptions Specifics of Expert Activity in Modern Applied Science (Review of Survey Results)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1