Safety of performing multiple free flap surgeries by a single surgeon in a single day

{"title":"Safety of performing multiple free flap surgeries by a single surgeon in a single day","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>With the growing popularity of the use of free flaps, surgeons may frequently encounter situations necessitating the performance of multiple free flap surgeries in a single day. Given its prolonged duration and technical complexity, concerns remain regarding their safety. This study investigated whether a single surgeon conducting multiple free flap surgeries in a day heightens the risk of complications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients who underwent free flap–based reconstruction from March 2002 to May 2023 were reviewed and categorized into 3 groups: one flap per day (Group 1), multiple flaps per day on the same patient (Group 2), and multiple flaps per day on different patients (Group 3). Outcomes, particularly perfusion-related complications (PRCs), were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 1910 cases were analyzed: 1570 in Group 1, 126 in Group 2, and 214 in Group 3. Over time, the proportion of cases in Group 3 increased. Group 3 had fewer breast reconstruction cases but more lower extremity reconstructions, with a higher prevalence of chronic wounds. Although the rates of PRCs varied among groups, multivariable analysis exhibited no association of performing multiple flaps in a day with their occurrence, regardless of breast or nonbreast reconstruction. The rate of arterial insufficiency was significantly higher in group 3 compared with group 1 after adjusting for other variables.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Performing multiple free flaps in a single day may not significantly increase the risks of overall PRCs. However, there appears to be a higher incidence of arterial insufficiency, emphasizing the need for careful planning and precise execution of procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524004236","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

With the growing popularity of the use of free flaps, surgeons may frequently encounter situations necessitating the performance of multiple free flap surgeries in a single day. Given its prolonged duration and technical complexity, concerns remain regarding their safety. This study investigated whether a single surgeon conducting multiple free flap surgeries in a day heightens the risk of complications.

Methods

Patients who underwent free flap–based reconstruction from March 2002 to May 2023 were reviewed and categorized into 3 groups: one flap per day (Group 1), multiple flaps per day on the same patient (Group 2), and multiple flaps per day on different patients (Group 3). Outcomes, particularly perfusion-related complications (PRCs), were compared.

Results

In total, 1910 cases were analyzed: 1570 in Group 1, 126 in Group 2, and 214 in Group 3. Over time, the proportion of cases in Group 3 increased. Group 3 had fewer breast reconstruction cases but more lower extremity reconstructions, with a higher prevalence of chronic wounds. Although the rates of PRCs varied among groups, multivariable analysis exhibited no association of performing multiple flaps in a day with their occurrence, regardless of breast or nonbreast reconstruction. The rate of arterial insufficiency was significantly higher in group 3 compared with group 1 after adjusting for other variables.

Conclusions

Performing multiple free flaps in a single day may not significantly increase the risks of overall PRCs. However, there appears to be a higher incidence of arterial insufficiency, emphasizing the need for careful planning and precise execution of procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由一名外科医生在一天内完成多例游离皮瓣手术的安全性
背景随着游离皮瓣的使用日益普及,外科医生可能会经常遇到需要在一天内进行多次游离皮瓣手术的情况。鉴于游离皮瓣手术持续时间长、技术复杂,其安全性仍令人担忧。方法回顾了2002年3月至2023年5月期间接受游离皮瓣重建的患者,并将其分为3组:每天一个皮瓣(第1组)、同一患者每天多个皮瓣(第2组)和不同患者每天多个皮瓣(第3组)。结果共分析了 1910 个病例:第一组 1570 个,第二组 126 个,第三组 214 个。随着时间的推移,第 3 组的病例比例有所增加。第三组的乳房再造病例较少,但下肢再造病例较多,慢性伤口发生率较高。虽然各组的PRC发生率不同,但多变量分析显示,无论乳房或非乳房重建,一天内进行多个皮瓣手术与PRC发生率没有关系。在调整其他变量后,第三组的动脉供血不足率明显高于第一组。然而,动脉供血不足的发生率似乎较高,这强调了精心策划和精确实施手术的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
期刊最新文献
Trends in advanced practice providers in plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2013–2021 Editorial Board Long-term results and patient-reported outcomes after vascularized fibular graft use in the treatment of post-traumatic bone defects of femur shaft and tibia: A retrospective cohort and cross-sectional survey study Taps, wicks, bridges and LIFTs: Clarification on the origins of lymphatic flaps The curious case of medical advisor: The house of cards in aesthetic medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1