How to increase the success rate in microsurgical free and pedicled flap reconstructions with intraoperative multistep ICG imaging: A case series with 400 consecutive cases

{"title":"How to increase the success rate in microsurgical free and pedicled flap reconstructions with intraoperative multistep ICG imaging: A case series with 400 consecutive cases","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Over the last decade, microsurgical soft-tissue transfer became the gold standard for various reconstructions throughout the body. Continuous improvement of instruments and surgical techniques, such as intraoperative indocyanine green angiography (ICG-A), allowed for a very high success rate. This study aimed to assess and validate the role of a standard intraoperative ICG-A in free and pedicled flap surgery to improve overall outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>From April 2018 to April 2023, 400 consecutive patients who underwent reconstruction using free and pedicled flaps were enrolled. ICG-A was always performed in a free flap after flap elevation, after microsurgical anastomosis, immediately after the flap inset, and after wound closure. In the pedicled flap, the sequential procedure was performed after flap elevation, flap inset, and wound closure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All 400 patients who underwent flap reconstruction using intraoperative ICG-A had an extremely low incidence of necrosis (0.75% partial necrosis among free and pedicled flaps) and reoperation for perfusion-related complications (0.75% due to acute ischemia and 0.50% due to flap congestion). Minor complications, such as hematoma, seroma, wound dehiscence, and wound infections, were managed with a second operation. No flaps were lost, and all patients were successfully treated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study showed how systematic multistep ICG-A for intraoperative assessment of free and pedicled flap perfusion can significantly reduce the complication rate, including flap loss and re-exploration surgeries, in a time- and cost-effective manner.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524004224","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Over the last decade, microsurgical soft-tissue transfer became the gold standard for various reconstructions throughout the body. Continuous improvement of instruments and surgical techniques, such as intraoperative indocyanine green angiography (ICG-A), allowed for a very high success rate. This study aimed to assess and validate the role of a standard intraoperative ICG-A in free and pedicled flap surgery to improve overall outcomes.

Patients and Methods

From April 2018 to April 2023, 400 consecutive patients who underwent reconstruction using free and pedicled flaps were enrolled. ICG-A was always performed in a free flap after flap elevation, after microsurgical anastomosis, immediately after the flap inset, and after wound closure. In the pedicled flap, the sequential procedure was performed after flap elevation, flap inset, and wound closure.

Results

All 400 patients who underwent flap reconstruction using intraoperative ICG-A had an extremely low incidence of necrosis (0.75% partial necrosis among free and pedicled flaps) and reoperation for perfusion-related complications (0.75% due to acute ischemia and 0.50% due to flap congestion). Minor complications, such as hematoma, seroma, wound dehiscence, and wound infections, were managed with a second operation. No flaps were lost, and all patients were successfully treated.

Conclusions

This study showed how systematic multistep ICG-A for intraoperative assessment of free and pedicled flap perfusion can significantly reduce the complication rate, including flap loss and re-exploration surgeries, in a time- and cost-effective manner.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何利用术中多步骤 ICG 成像提高显微外科游离皮瓣和带蒂皮瓣重建的成功率:400 例连续病例系列研究
背景在过去十年中,显微外科软组织转移术已成为全身各种重建的黄金标准。器械和手术技术的不断改进,如术中吲哚菁绿血管造影术(ICG-A),使得手术成功率非常高。本研究旨在评估和验证标准术中 ICG-A 在游离皮瓣和带蒂皮瓣手术中的作用,以提高整体疗效。患者和方法从 2018 年 4 月至 2023 年 4 月,连续 400 例使用游离皮瓣和带蒂皮瓣进行重建的患者被纳入研究。在游离皮瓣中,ICG-A 始终在皮瓣抬高后、显微外科吻合后、皮瓣嵌入后立即和伤口闭合后进行。结果 所有使用术中 ICG-A 进行皮瓣重建的 400 例患者中,坏死发生率极低(游离皮瓣和带蒂皮瓣中部分坏死发生率为 0.75%),因灌注相关并发症而再次手术的发生率也极低(急性缺血发生率为 0.75%,皮瓣充血发生率为 0.50%)。轻微的并发症,如血肿、血清肿、伤口裂开和伤口感染,则通过第二次手术来处理。结论 这项研究表明,在术中对游离皮瓣和带蒂皮瓣的灌注进行系统的多步骤 ICG-A 评估,可以显著降低并发症发生率,包括皮瓣脱落和再次探查手术,既省时又经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
期刊最新文献
Trends in advanced practice providers in plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2013–2021 Editorial Board Long-term results and patient-reported outcomes after vascularized fibular graft use in the treatment of post-traumatic bone defects of femur shaft and tibia: A retrospective cohort and cross-sectional survey study Taps, wicks, bridges and LIFTs: Clarification on the origins of lymphatic flaps The curious case of medical advisor: The house of cards in aesthetic medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1