Assessing the effectiveness of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation for treating obsessive-compulsive disorder: Results from a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Comprehensive psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152520
Yang Wang , Jiayue Cheng , Hanyang Ruan , Jiazhe Zhang , Zifeng Zheng , Liangjun Lin , Jian Gao , Chenyu Yuan , Huiqin Han , Qing Fan , Zhen Wang
{"title":"Assessing the effectiveness of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation for treating obsessive-compulsive disorder: Results from a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial","authors":"Yang Wang ,&nbsp;Jiayue Cheng ,&nbsp;Hanyang Ruan ,&nbsp;Jiazhe Zhang ,&nbsp;Zifeng Zheng ,&nbsp;Liangjun Lin ,&nbsp;Jian Gao ,&nbsp;Chenyu Yuan ,&nbsp;Huiqin Han ,&nbsp;Qing Fan ,&nbsp;Zhen Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Characterized by its disabling nature, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) affects individuals profoundly, with nearly 40% of patients showing resistance to initial treatment methods. Despite being safe and easily accessible, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) lacks extensive substantiation supporting its efficacy in treating OCD. The objective of this study was to evaluate how cathodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) applied to the right orbitofrontal cortex affected patients with OCD in terms of efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>47 patients with OCD were enrolled. They were randomly allocated to active or sham stimulation groups, and underwent HD-tDCS stimulation treatment for 2 weeks. The central electrode located in the right orbitofrontal cortex region was cathodic. The severity of the patients' obsessive-compulsive symptoms, depression and anxiety were assessed before and after treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Out of the total, 44 patients concluded the treatment, comprising 23 participants from the active stimulation group and 21 from the sham stimulation group. Notably, substantial reductions in symptoms related to OCD, depression, and anxiety were exhibited in both groups. With a response rate of 26.1% in the active stimulation group and 23.8% in the sham stimulation group, there was no significant difference in efficacy observed. Furthermore, the reduction in depression and anxiety symptoms at the conclusion of the treatment was not notably superior in the active stimulation group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study provided evidence for the acceptability and safety of HD-tDCS. Nevertheless, the study did not reveal notable clinical effectiveness of tDCS in addressing moderate to severe OCD in comparison to the sham stimulation group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10554,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive psychiatry","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 152520"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X24000713/pdfft?md5=41772d7c92f5c5dbfe7e86ef20d48756&pid=1-s2.0-S0010440X24000713-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X24000713","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Characterized by its disabling nature, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) affects individuals profoundly, with nearly 40% of patients showing resistance to initial treatment methods. Despite being safe and easily accessible, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) lacks extensive substantiation supporting its efficacy in treating OCD. The objective of this study was to evaluate how cathodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) applied to the right orbitofrontal cortex affected patients with OCD in terms of efficacy.

Method

47 patients with OCD were enrolled. They were randomly allocated to active or sham stimulation groups, and underwent HD-tDCS stimulation treatment for 2 weeks. The central electrode located in the right orbitofrontal cortex region was cathodic. The severity of the patients' obsessive-compulsive symptoms, depression and anxiety were assessed before and after treatment.

Result

Out of the total, 44 patients concluded the treatment, comprising 23 participants from the active stimulation group and 21 from the sham stimulation group. Notably, substantial reductions in symptoms related to OCD, depression, and anxiety were exhibited in both groups. With a response rate of 26.1% in the active stimulation group and 23.8% in the sham stimulation group, there was no significant difference in efficacy observed. Furthermore, the reduction in depression and anxiety symptoms at the conclusion of the treatment was not notably superior in the active stimulation group.

Conclusion

This study provided evidence for the acceptability and safety of HD-tDCS. Nevertheless, the study did not reveal notable clinical effectiveness of tDCS in addressing moderate to severe OCD in comparison to the sham stimulation group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估高清经颅直流电刺激治疗强迫症的效果:随机、双盲、对照试验的结果
目的强迫症(OCD)以其致残性为特征,对个人影响深远,近 40% 的患者对最初的治疗方法表现出抵抗力。尽管经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)安全且容易获得,但其治疗强迫症的疗效却缺乏广泛的证据支持。本研究旨在评估应用于右侧眶额皮层的阴极高清经颅直流电刺激(HD-tDCS)对强迫症患者的疗效影响。他们被随机分配到主动刺激组和假刺激组,接受为期两周的 HD-tDCS 刺激治疗。位于右侧眶额皮层区域的中央电极为阴极。结果共有44名患者完成了治疗,其中主动刺激组23人,假刺激组21人。值得注意的是,两组患者的强迫症、抑郁症和焦虑症相关症状均有显著减轻。主动刺激组的反应率为 26.1%,假刺激组为 23.8%,在疗效上没有明显差异。此外,在治疗结束时,主动刺激组抑郁和焦虑症状的减轻程度也没有明显优势。尽管如此,与假刺激组相比,该研究并未显示出 tDCS 在治疗中重度强迫症方面的显著临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comprehensive psychiatry
Comprehensive psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: "Comprehensive Psychiatry" is an open access, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the field of psychiatry and mental health. Its primary mission is to share the latest advancements in knowledge to enhance patient care and deepen the understanding of mental illnesses. The journal is supported by a diverse team of international editors and peer reviewers, ensuring the publication of high-quality research with a strong focus on clinical relevance and the implications for psychopathology. "Comprehensive Psychiatry" encourages authors to present their research in an accessible manner, facilitating engagement with clinicians, policymakers, and the broader public. By embracing an open access policy, the journal aims to maximize the global impact of its content, making it readily available to a wide audience and fostering scientific collaboration and public awareness beyond the traditional academic community. This approach is designed to promote a more inclusive and informed dialogue on mental health, contributing to the overall progress in the field.
期刊最新文献
Adequacy of treatment in outpatients with obsessive-compulsive disorder A comparison of firefighter mental health education programs: A descriptive thematic analysis of firefighter experiences Acceptability, tolerability and safety of the BRIGhTMIND trial: Connectivity-guided intermittent theta-burst stimulation versus F3- repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression Exercise moderates longitudinal group psychopathology networks in individuals with eating disorders The deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii) as a model organism to explore the naturalistic psychobiological mechanisms contributing to compulsive-like rigidity: A narrative overview of advances and opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1