Similarities and contrasts: Comparing U.S. and Canadian paths to net-zero

IF 5.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy and climate change Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100147
Emma Starke , Mark Jaccard , Jotham Peters
{"title":"Similarities and contrasts: Comparing U.S. and Canadian paths to net-zero","authors":"Emma Starke ,&nbsp;Mark Jaccard ,&nbsp;Jotham Peters","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Canada and the United States (US) have both committed to reaching net zero emissions by 2050 but neither have implemented policy sufficient to reach this target. Knowledge of the technical steps to deep decarbonization is needed alongside an understanding of how each country might be similarly and uniquely impacted by a transition to net zero emissions, contingent on specific technology advancements or policy decisions. We use the computable general equilibrium model, gTech, to simulate sixteen net zero scenarios for Canada and the US varying by technology and policy assumptions as part of the energy modelling forum 37 (EMF37) study. We find that both economies similarly continue to grow in all scenarios out to 2050 with the rate of growth largely determined by assumptions on negative emissions technology. Sectoral impacts differ between countries as a result of current emissions and GDP profiles in combination with assumed net zero scenario policy and technology advancements. In the US, we find that efficient use of electricity is a slightly more important predictor of economic outcomes, while Canada's economy is marginally more responsive to cost and performance improvements in carbon capture technologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278724000230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Canada and the United States (US) have both committed to reaching net zero emissions by 2050 but neither have implemented policy sufficient to reach this target. Knowledge of the technical steps to deep decarbonization is needed alongside an understanding of how each country might be similarly and uniquely impacted by a transition to net zero emissions, contingent on specific technology advancements or policy decisions. We use the computable general equilibrium model, gTech, to simulate sixteen net zero scenarios for Canada and the US varying by technology and policy assumptions as part of the energy modelling forum 37 (EMF37) study. We find that both economies similarly continue to grow in all scenarios out to 2050 with the rate of growth largely determined by assumptions on negative emissions technology. Sectoral impacts differ between countries as a result of current emissions and GDP profiles in combination with assumed net zero scenario policy and technology advancements. In the US, we find that efficient use of electricity is a slightly more important predictor of economic outcomes, while Canada's economy is marginally more responsive to cost and performance improvements in carbon capture technologies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相似与对比:比较美国和加拿大实现净零排放的途径
加拿大和美国都承诺到 2050 年实现净零排放,但两国都没有实施足以实现这一目标的政策。我们需要了解深度去碳化的技术步骤,同时还要了解每个国家在向净零排放过渡时会受到哪些类似和独特的影响,这取决于具体的技术进步或政策决策。作为能源建模论坛 37(EMF37)研究的一部分,我们使用可计算一般均衡模型 gTech 模拟了加拿大和美国的十六种净零排放情景,这些情景因技术和政策假设而异。我们发现,在 2050 年之前的所有情景中,两国经济都将继续增长,而增长速度主要取决于对负排放技术的假设。由于当前的排放和 GDP 情况与假定的净零情景政策和技术进步相结合,各国的部门影响有所不同。在美国,我们发现高效用电对经济结果的预测作用略大,而加拿大经济对碳捕集技术的成本和性能改进的反应略强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing green hydrogen and green ammonia as energy carriers in utility-scale transport and subsurface storage Global trade of green iron as a game changer for a near-zero global steel industry? - A scenario-based assessment of regionalized impacts Strategic approach to accelerating regional bioenergy development: Bioelectricity for emission reduction and sustainability The role of the pulp and paper industry in achieving net zero U.S. CO2 emissions in 2050 Exploring attitudes and behavioral patterns in residential energy consumption: Data-driven by a machine learning approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1