The skin tears knowledge among geriatric ward nurses and associated factors: A cross-sectional study

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Journal of tissue viability Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jtv.2024.07.015
Rong Hu , Xiaoying Zhong, Xiaoya Li , Yanfei Ma, Huilin He, Chunyan Wang, Fang He
{"title":"The skin tears knowledge among geriatric ward nurses and associated factors: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Rong Hu ,&nbsp;Xiaoying Zhong,&nbsp;Xiaoya Li ,&nbsp;Yanfei Ma,&nbsp;Huilin He,&nbsp;Chunyan Wang,&nbsp;Fang He","doi":"10.1016/j.jtv.2024.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To determine the level of knowledge about skin tears among geriatric ward nurses and identify associated factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this cross-sectional study in Southwest China, 1172 geriatric ward nurses from 10 hospitals participated. Data were collected using Sojump, a Chinese web-based platform, and the Skin Tear Knowledge Assessment Instrument was used to assess their knowledge. The analysis involved descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study involved participants with an average age of 36.73 (SD = 6.54) years. More than half of the participants had less than 10 years of experience in geriatric wards. 27 % specialized in wound care, and 68.1 % lacked specific training in skin tear (ST) knowledge. Additionally, 82.7 % of geriatric nurses had never been exposed to guidelines on ST prevention and management. In the geriatric ward, 36.6 % of nurses received training in ST prevention. The average knowledge score about Skin Tears (STs) was 9.52 (SD = 2.39) out of 18. 'Treatment' had the lowest mean score, while 'Specific patient groups' had the highest. The multiple linear regression analysis found that nurses' knowledge of STs was influenced by sex(β = 0.096, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), educational level(β = 0.062, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), participation in ST (β = −0.193, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 and wound care training(β = −0.120, <em>P</em> = 0.004), and specialization as a wound care nurse(β = −0.350, <em>P</em> = 0.001). These factors explained 61.3 % of the variance in knowledge about STs among the participants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The geriatric ward had limited knowledge of STs. To improve their skills in dealing with STs, managers should provide tailored training to nurses and establish a standardized, evidence-based nursing process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of tissue viability","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 1012-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of tissue viability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965206X24001207","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To determine the level of knowledge about skin tears among geriatric ward nurses and identify associated factors.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study in Southwest China, 1172 geriatric ward nurses from 10 hospitals participated. Data were collected using Sojump, a Chinese web-based platform, and the Skin Tear Knowledge Assessment Instrument was used to assess their knowledge. The analysis involved descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression.

Results

The study involved participants with an average age of 36.73 (SD = 6.54) years. More than half of the participants had less than 10 years of experience in geriatric wards. 27 % specialized in wound care, and 68.1 % lacked specific training in skin tear (ST) knowledge. Additionally, 82.7 % of geriatric nurses had never been exposed to guidelines on ST prevention and management. In the geriatric ward, 36.6 % of nurses received training in ST prevention. The average knowledge score about Skin Tears (STs) was 9.52 (SD = 2.39) out of 18. 'Treatment' had the lowest mean score, while 'Specific patient groups' had the highest. The multiple linear regression analysis found that nurses' knowledge of STs was influenced by sex(β = 0.096, P < 0.001), educational level(β = 0.062, P < 0.001), participation in ST (β = −0.193, P < 0.001 and wound care training(β = −0.120, P = 0.004), and specialization as a wound care nurse(β = −0.350, P = 0.001). These factors explained 61.3 % of the variance in knowledge about STs among the participants.

Conclusion

The geriatric ward had limited knowledge of STs. To improve their skills in dealing with STs, managers should provide tailored training to nurses and establish a standardized, evidence-based nursing process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年病房护士对皮肤裂伤的认识及相关因素:一项横断面研究
目的了解老年病房护士对皮肤撕裂的认知水平,并找出相关因素。方法对西南地区10家医院的1172名老年病房护士进行横断面研究。使用Sojump中文网络平台收集数据,并使用皮肤撕裂知识评估仪对其知识进行评估。分析方法包括描述性统计、相关分析和多元线性回归。结果研究对象平均年龄36.73岁(SD = 6.54)。超过一半的参与者在老年病房的工作经验少于10年。27%的人专门从事伤口护理,68.1%的人缺乏皮肤撕裂(ST)知识的专门培训。此外,82.7%的老年护士从未接触过性传播感染预防和管理指南。在老年病房,36.6%的护士接受了性传播感染预防培训。对皮肤撕裂(STs)的平均知识得分为9.52 (SD = 2.39)。“治疗”的平均得分最低,而“特定患者群体”的平均得分最高。多元线性回归分析发现,性别对护士STs知识知晓程度有影响(β = 0.096, P <;0.001),教育水平(β = 0.062, P <;0.001), ST的参与(β = - 0.193, P <;0.001和伤口护理培训(β = - 0.120, P = 0.004),以及伤口护理护士专业化(β = - 0.350, P = 0.001)。这些因素解释了参与者对STs知识差异的61.3%。结论老年病房对STs的认识有限。为了提高护士处理STs的技能,管理人员应该为护士提供量身定制的培训,并建立标准化的循证护理流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of tissue viability
Journal of tissue viability DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
16.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tissue Viability is the official publication of the Tissue Viability Society and is a quarterly journal concerned with all aspects of the occurrence and treatment of wounds, ulcers and pressure sores including patient care, pain, nutrition, wound healing, research, prevention, mobility, social problems and management. The Journal particularly encourages papers covering skin and skin wounds but will consider articles that discuss injury in any tissue. Articles that stress the multi-professional nature of tissue viability are especially welcome. We seek to encourage new authors as well as well-established contributors to the field - one aim of the journal is to enable all participants in tissue viability to share information with colleagues.
期刊最新文献
Pediatric vascular access secured with tissue adhesive: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Effectiveness of topical oils used in the prevention of pressure injury incidence and development among patients: a scoping review. Machine learning methods to evaluate fluctuation in oxygenation and peripheral tissue temperature, in sacral and trochanteric area under pressure in healthy subjects and institutionalized patients. A prospective non-randomized trial. Pressure injury (PI) study in a Malaysia tertiary hospital based on European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) minimum data set: Point prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and prediction scores. Nurses' adherence, barriers, and facilitators to evidence-based pressure injury prevention practice in pediatric critical care units: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1