Utilization of abdominal radiography in the emergency department: Appropriateness, interpretation, radiation protection and costs

P. García García , L. del Campo del Val , I. Salmerón Béliz , E. Paz Calzada , C. Alonso Rodríguez , P. García Castañón , P. Rodríguez Carnero
{"title":"Utilization of abdominal radiography in the emergency department: Appropriateness, interpretation, radiation protection and costs","authors":"P. García García ,&nbsp;L. del Campo del Val ,&nbsp;I. Salmerón Béliz ,&nbsp;E. Paz Calzada ,&nbsp;C. Alonso Rodríguez ,&nbsp;P. García Castañón ,&nbsp;P. Rodríguez Carnero","doi":"10.1016/j.rxeng.2023.01.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The use of abdominal radiography (AXR) apparently continues to be widespread despite its limited indications, the potential radiation and unnecessary costs associated. In addition, the interpretation and its report seem variable and not always performed by a radiologist. Our objective is to analyze the use, adequacy and usefulness of AXR in the emergency of a tertiary referral hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p><span>We retrospectively reviewed all the AXR performed in January 2020 in the emergency of our centre, as well as the patient’s demographics and medical records, technical quality of the radiographs, indications according to the </span>SERAM (Spanish Society of Radiology) Appropriateness Guidelines, presence of a formal radiology report, and impact on the clinical management of the patient. Of all non-appropriated AXR we calculated the radiation received by the patients and its extra costs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In January 2020, 429 AXR (9.1% of all radiographies) were performed in the emergency of our centre. The most frequent indication was abdominal pain (40%, n = 176), followed by low back pain (21.4%, n = 92). 12.4% of AXR requested did not include any clinical information. Most of the AXR (79.6%) had sufficient technical quality. 61.3% (n = 263) of the AXR performed were not indicated, assuming an average unjustified radiation dose per patient of 0.50 ± 0.33 mSv, and a total additional cost of 6575;. Only 6% of the inadequate AXRs led to a change in the clinical management of the patient, compared to 29% of the adequate AXR (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Only 3% of the AXR had a formal radiology report.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>AXR is still common in the emergency setting, although most of them might be inadequate according to the SERAM Appropriateness Guidelines. Its use should be optimized to avoid unnecessary radiation and costs. Radiologists must have a more active participation in the management of AXR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94185,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173510724000788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The use of abdominal radiography (AXR) apparently continues to be widespread despite its limited indications, the potential radiation and unnecessary costs associated. In addition, the interpretation and its report seem variable and not always performed by a radiologist. Our objective is to analyze the use, adequacy and usefulness of AXR in the emergency of a tertiary referral hospital.

Material and methods

We retrospectively reviewed all the AXR performed in January 2020 in the emergency of our centre, as well as the patient’s demographics and medical records, technical quality of the radiographs, indications according to the SERAM (Spanish Society of Radiology) Appropriateness Guidelines, presence of a formal radiology report, and impact on the clinical management of the patient. Of all non-appropriated AXR we calculated the radiation received by the patients and its extra costs.

Results

In January 2020, 429 AXR (9.1% of all radiographies) were performed in the emergency of our centre. The most frequent indication was abdominal pain (40%, n = 176), followed by low back pain (21.4%, n = 92). 12.4% of AXR requested did not include any clinical information. Most of the AXR (79.6%) had sufficient technical quality. 61.3% (n = 263) of the AXR performed were not indicated, assuming an average unjustified radiation dose per patient of 0.50 ± 0.33 mSv, and a total additional cost of 6575;. Only 6% of the inadequate AXRs led to a change in the clinical management of the patient, compared to 29% of the adequate AXR (p < 0.001). Only 3% of the AXR had a formal radiology report.

Conclusions

AXR is still common in the emergency setting, although most of them might be inadequate according to the SERAM Appropriateness Guidelines. Its use should be optimized to avoid unnecessary radiation and costs. Radiologists must have a more active participation in the management of AXR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科使用腹部放射摄影:适宜性、解释、辐射防护和成本
导言:尽管腹部放射摄影术(AXR)的适应症有限,而且可能会产生辐射和不必要的费用,但它显然仍在广泛使用。此外,其解释和报告似乎也不尽相同,而且并非总是由放射科医生进行。我们的目的是分析 AXR 在一家三级转诊医院急诊中的使用情况、充分性和实用性。材料和方法我们回顾性地查看了 2020 年 1 月在本中心急诊中进行的所有 AXR,以及患者的人口统计学和医疗记录、X 光片的技术质量、SERAM(西班牙放射学会)适当性指南中规定的适应症、是否有正式的放射学报告以及对患者临床治疗的影响。结果 2020 年 1 月,本中心急诊共进行了 429 次 AXR(占所有放射检查的 9.1%)。最常见的适应症是腹痛(40%,176 人),其次是腰痛(21.4%,92 人)。12.4%的 AXR 申请不包括任何临床信息。大多数 AXR(79.6%)具有足够的技术质量。61.3%(n = 263)的 AXR 不适用,假设每位患者的平均不合理辐射剂量为 0.50 ± 0.33 mSv,额外总成本为 6575 美元。在不适当的 AXR 中,只有 6% 导致患者的临床管理发生了变化,而在适当的 AXR 中,这一比例为 29%(p < 0.001)。只有 3% 的 AXR 有正式的放射学报告。应优化其使用,以避免不必要的辐射和费用。放射科医生必须更积极地参与 AXR 的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usefulness of the superior orbitomeatal line without the lens included in the scan range at different tube voltage during pediatric head CT Magnetic resonance imaging findings for inflammatory mastitis of unknown etiology Updating the rules for Scientific Letters and Brief Reports Contrast-enhanced mammography and preoperative magnetic seed placement in breast cancer patients for the detection of residual disease following neoadjuvant systemic therapy The legal regulation of artificial intelligence in the European Union: A practical guide for radiologists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1