Assessing forest villagers’ livelihood vulnerability to the environmental changes in Buxa Tiger Reserve of sub-Himalayan India

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY Trees, Forests and People Pub Date : 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100632
Pritha Datta , Dil Bahadur Rahut , Bhagirath Behera , Tetsushi Sonobe , Naveen
{"title":"Assessing forest villagers’ livelihood vulnerability to the environmental changes in Buxa Tiger Reserve of sub-Himalayan India","authors":"Pritha Datta ,&nbsp;Dil Bahadur Rahut ,&nbsp;Bhagirath Behera ,&nbsp;Tetsushi Sonobe ,&nbsp;Naveen","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Himalayan forest communities historically lived in harmony with their environment; however, anthropogenic activities have disrupted this balance. Deforestation, climate change, and habitat degradation have heightened vulnerability, compounded by human-wildlife conflicts (HWCs) and limited access to crucial livelihood capitals. Addressing these challenges requires a deeper understanding of factors associated with household-level vulnerability, prompting this study in the Buxa Tiger Reserve of sub-Himalayan India. Data from 345 households across ten villages reveal significant exposure to HWCs, particularly elephant crop raiding and leopard-induced livestock losses. Sensitivity arises from water scarcity, health issues, food shortages, and inadequate housing conditions, while limited adaptive capacity stems from infrastructural and financial constraints, among others. Spatial disparities emerge, with tribal households exhibiting lower exposure but lesser adaptive capacity compared to non-tribal communities. Proximity to different facilities (e.g., markets, financial institutions, primary healthcare centers) and government schemes significantly influence vulnerability, revealing unexpected associations. Besides, villagers’ willingness to relocate demonstrates higher adaptive capacity and perceived benefits outside the reserve. By unraveling the layers of vulnerability at the household level, this study provides valuable guidance for policymakers, forest managers, and other stakeholders. It offers insights into sustainable development strategies, resonating globally to harmonize human actions with environmental conservation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001390/pdfft?md5=f763ee480367c3d210f1e88520912bc2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666719324001390-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Himalayan forest communities historically lived in harmony with their environment; however, anthropogenic activities have disrupted this balance. Deforestation, climate change, and habitat degradation have heightened vulnerability, compounded by human-wildlife conflicts (HWCs) and limited access to crucial livelihood capitals. Addressing these challenges requires a deeper understanding of factors associated with household-level vulnerability, prompting this study in the Buxa Tiger Reserve of sub-Himalayan India. Data from 345 households across ten villages reveal significant exposure to HWCs, particularly elephant crop raiding and leopard-induced livestock losses. Sensitivity arises from water scarcity, health issues, food shortages, and inadequate housing conditions, while limited adaptive capacity stems from infrastructural and financial constraints, among others. Spatial disparities emerge, with tribal households exhibiting lower exposure but lesser adaptive capacity compared to non-tribal communities. Proximity to different facilities (e.g., markets, financial institutions, primary healthcare centers) and government schemes significantly influence vulnerability, revealing unexpected associations. Besides, villagers’ willingness to relocate demonstrates higher adaptive capacity and perceived benefits outside the reserve. By unraveling the layers of vulnerability at the household level, this study provides valuable guidance for policymakers, forest managers, and other stakeholders. It offers insights into sustainable development strategies, resonating globally to harmonize human actions with environmental conservation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估印度次喜马拉雅地区 Buxa 老虎保护区森林村民的生计对环境变化的脆弱性
喜马拉雅山森林社区历来与环境和谐共处;然而,人类活动破坏了这一平衡。森林砍伐、气候变化和栖息地退化加剧了脆弱性,而人类与野生动物的冲突(HWCs)和对重要生计资本的获取受限又使问题更加复杂。要应对这些挑战,就必须更深入地了解与家庭脆弱性相关的因素,这促使我们在印度次喜马拉雅地区的布萨老虎保护区开展了这项研究。来自 10 个村庄 345 户家庭的数据显示,这些家庭面临着严重的水土流失风险,尤其是大象抢夺农作物和豹子造成的牲畜损失。缺水、健康问题、食物短缺和住房条件不足等因素造成了敏感性,而基础设施和财政限制等因素又造成了有限的适应能力。与非部落社区相比,部落家庭的受灾风险较低,但适应能力较弱。与不同设施(如市场、金融机构、初级保健中心)和政府计划的邻近程度对脆弱性有重大影响,揭示了意想不到的关联。此外,村民搬迁的意愿表明他们具有较高的适应能力,并认为保护区外有更多的好处。通过揭示家庭层面的脆弱性,本研究为政策制定者、森林管理者和其他利益相关者提供了宝贵的指导。它为可持续发展战略提供了见解,在全球范围内引起了共鸣,以协调人类行动与环境保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
期刊最新文献
Tapping below the lateral line does not reduce maple sap yield or quality Examining woody plant diversity across indigenous agroforestry practices in the Kellem Wollega zone, Western Ethiopia The livelihood impacts of eucalypt plantations on rural farm households in Western Gurage Watersheds, Central-south Ethiopia Palynological approaches to forest restoration in Southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities for Thailand—A systematic review Timber traceability, determining effective methods to combat illegal logging in Africa: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1