Use of process simulation to obtain life cycle inventory data for LCA: A systematic review

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Cleaner Environmental Systems Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100215
Jannatul Ferdous , Farid Bensebaa , Kasun Hewage , Pankaj Bhowmik , Nathan Pelletier
{"title":"Use of process simulation to obtain life cycle inventory data for LCA: A systematic review","authors":"Jannatul Ferdous ,&nbsp;Farid Bensebaa ,&nbsp;Kasun Hewage ,&nbsp;Pankaj Bhowmik ,&nbsp;Nathan Pelletier","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) analysis is an essential and time-consuming phase of life cycle assessment (LCA). While primary data is among the most reliable and desirable data source types, it is often challenging to collect for industry-specific processes due to confidentiality concerns, in particular with respect to unique proprietary processes. In such cases, computer-based process simulation software can be used to fill gaps in inventory data based on mass and energy balances. While building process simulation models, engagement with industry is essential for verification of process models and validation of simulated data. Although process simulation-based life cycle inventory modelling is not a new research area, there has been no systematic review on this topic with respect to common methodological choices. To fill this gap, this systematic review aims to identify common practices in simulating LCI data using process simulation. Studies that used process simulation for LCI modelling were reviewed to identify the reasons for using process simulation, approaches for simulating LCI, software employed, validation processes, and processes to calculate and report uncertainty. Based on the review findings, a methodological framework was proposed to explain how process simulation-based LCI can be integrated with conventional LCA, specifically for industrial processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100215"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000539/pdfft?md5=401016f1cc72f855f963bdff99dade6d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000539-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) analysis is an essential and time-consuming phase of life cycle assessment (LCA). While primary data is among the most reliable and desirable data source types, it is often challenging to collect for industry-specific processes due to confidentiality concerns, in particular with respect to unique proprietary processes. In such cases, computer-based process simulation software can be used to fill gaps in inventory data based on mass and energy balances. While building process simulation models, engagement with industry is essential for verification of process models and validation of simulated data. Although process simulation-based life cycle inventory modelling is not a new research area, there has been no systematic review on this topic with respect to common methodological choices. To fill this gap, this systematic review aims to identify common practices in simulating LCI data using process simulation. Studies that used process simulation for LCI modelling were reviewed to identify the reasons for using process simulation, approaches for simulating LCI, software employed, validation processes, and processes to calculate and report uncertainty. Based on the review findings, a methodological framework was proposed to explain how process simulation-based LCI can be integrated with conventional LCA, specifically for industrial processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用工艺模拟获取生命周期清单数据用于生命周期评估:系统综述
生命周期清单(LCI)分析是生命周期评估(LCA)的一个重要且耗时的阶段。虽然原始数据是最可靠、最理想的数据源类型之一,但由于保密问题,特别是对于独特的专有工艺,收集特定行业工艺的原始数据往往具有挑战性。在这种情况下,可以使用基于计算机的工艺模拟软件,根据质量和能量平衡来填补清单数据的空白。在建立工艺模拟模型时,与行业的合作对于验证工艺模型和确认模拟数据至关重要。虽然基于过程模拟的生命周期清单建模并不是一个新的研究领域,但在常见方法选择方面还没有系统性的综述。为了填补这一空白,本系统性综述旨在确定使用过程仿真模拟 LCI 数据的常见做法。对使用过程模拟进行 LCI 建模的研究进行了回顾,以确定使用过程模拟的原因、模拟 LCI 的方法、使用的软件、验证过程以及计算和报告不确定性的过程。根据审查结果,提出了一个方法框架,以解释如何将基于过程模拟的 LCI 与传统的生命周期评估相结合,特别是针对工业过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Life cycle assessment of a point absorber wave energy converter A systematic review of the SAFA framework in the literature: An approach to assess sustainability in agri-food systems Implications of environmental constraints and opportunities on livestock production and emissions: New Zealand as a case study Linking environmental impact assessment and Positive Energy Districts: A literature review Gate-to-gate life cycle assessment of lithium-ion battery recycling pre-treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1