A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with crushed cartilage in rhinoplasty

Abstract

Background

Crushed cartilage grafts improve augmentation and contour irregularities in rhinoplasty; however, they are associated with complications including resorption, asymmetries, palpability, and need for revision surgery.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines was performed on all recorded history up to November 2022 using the search query ("crush" or "crushed") AND cartilage AND rhinoplasty for PubMed, World of Science, Embase, and Cochrane online registries. Data were collected on study information, patient demographics, surgical details, and outcomes. Graft resorption and revision surgery were pooled in a random-effects model, and a subgroup analysis was performed for coverage/non-coverage of the cartilage and degree of crushing.

Results

The initial search yielded 163 results, with 11 studies included in the final full-text review. A total of 1132 patients were analyzed, with 456 (40.3%) women, mean age of 48.0 years, and an average follow-up period of 24.9 months. Cartilage resorption rates were statistically higher in graft preparation using severely crushed cartilage (3.4%) compared to non-severely crushed cartilage (0.9%, p = 0.049). There was no significant difference in resorption rate for patients with covered cartilage graft (1.3%) compared to those with non-covered grafts (1.8%, p = 0.7). There were significantly more revision surgeries for severely crushed (17.9%) compared to non-severely crushed (3.5%, p = 0.003) cartilage grafts.

Conclusions

Severely crushed cartilage grafting provides smooth contour and less palpability compared to other degrees of crushing but demonstrates significantly higher rate of resorption.