The impact of ESG scores on the value relevance of fair value hierarchy of financial instruments: Evidence from European Banks

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Research in International Business and Finance Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102451
{"title":"The impact of ESG scores on the value relevance of fair value hierarchy of financial instruments: Evidence from European Banks","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using hand-collected accounting data on 154 European banks, we investigate the impact of ESG scores on the value-relevance of the fair value hierarchy (FVH) of financial instruments held on their balance sheets. Our findings are multi-faceted. Banks that possess an ESG score are valued at a premium on book value and the presence of the ESG score is associated with lower (higher) value-relevance of the reported fair value of Level 1 (Level 2 and 3) items. The value relevance of Level 2 and 3 FVH levels, however, decreases in the ESG score. These findings imply that, while availability of ESG scores proxies for market visibility, stock market investors either do not treat the ESG score as a reliable measure of ESG performance or, embracing the “overinvestment view” rather than the “risk mitigation view” of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), do not associate positive ESG performance to greater corporate transparency and trustworthiness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924002447/pdfft?md5=f41bf81608701778fd8a9c2acf567b25&pid=1-s2.0-S0275531924002447-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924002447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using hand-collected accounting data on 154 European banks, we investigate the impact of ESG scores on the value-relevance of the fair value hierarchy (FVH) of financial instruments held on their balance sheets. Our findings are multi-faceted. Banks that possess an ESG score are valued at a premium on book value and the presence of the ESG score is associated with lower (higher) value-relevance of the reported fair value of Level 1 (Level 2 and 3) items. The value relevance of Level 2 and 3 FVH levels, however, decreases in the ESG score. These findings imply that, while availability of ESG scores proxies for market visibility, stock market investors either do not treat the ESG score as a reliable measure of ESG performance or, embracing the “overinvestment view” rather than the “risk mitigation view” of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), do not associate positive ESG performance to greater corporate transparency and trustworthiness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ESG评分对金融工具公允价值层次价值相关性的影响:来自欧洲银行的证据
我们利用手工收集的 154 家欧洲银行的会计数据,研究了环境、社会和公司治理得分对其资产负债表中金融工具公允价值等级(FVH)的价值相关性的影响。我们的研究结果是多方面的。拥有 ESG 分数的银行的估值比账面价值高,而且 ESG 分数的存在与报告的第一级(第二级和第三级)项目公允价值的价值相关性较低(较高)有关。然而,第二级和第三级公允价值水平的价值相关性随着 ESG 分数的增加而降低。这些研究结果表明,虽然ESG得分可以代表市场可见度,但股票市场投资者要么不把ESG得分作为衡量ESG表现的可靠标准,要么接受 "过度投资观点 "而不是企业社会责任(CSR)的 "风险缓解观点",不把积极的ESG表现与更高的企业透明度和可信度联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.20%
发文量
240
期刊介绍: Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance
期刊最新文献
Multiscale cross-sector tail credit risk spillovers in China: Evidence from EEMD-based VAR quantile analysis Uncovering patterns of fintech behavior in Italian banks: A multidimensional statistical analysis The impact of digital transformation on the servitization transformation of manufacturing firms Do oil price shocks drive systematic risk premia in stock markets? A novel investment application Signaling vs. agency theory: What drives dividends of promoter-owned firms during a crisis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1